Fellow eye changes in optic neuritis correlate with the risk of multiple sclerosis

Abstract

Background

Recent studies demonstrate early diffuse central nervous system (CNS) inflammation in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The clinically unaffected (fellow) eye of patients with unilateral optic neuritis (ON) may reflect the status of normal-appearing white matter in the CNS, which can be assessed electrophysiologically.

Objective

To study the relationship between electrophysiological parameters in the fellow eye of ON patients, and risk of conversion to MS.

Methods

Forty-eight consecutive patients with acute unilateral ON were examined 12 months after ON of which 14 had MS, 19 remained high risk (HR) for MS, and 15 had low risk (LR) for MS according to McDonald’s criteria. Twenty-five age-matched controls were also tested. Amplitude and latency of multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) in the fellow eyes of patients at 12 months were analyzed and compared with controls.

Results

Average mfVEP amplitude was 240 ± 35, 232 ± 36, 181 ± 38, and 169 ± 48 nV for controls, LR, HR, and MS groups respectively. Average mfVEP latency for controls, LR, HR, and MS patients was 139.7 ± 5.5, 141.7 ± 3.6, 145.9 ± 8.9, and 152.0 ± 9.9 ms respectively.

Conclusions

The magnitude of latency prolongation and amplitude decline 12 months after the initial episode was proportional to the risk of MS. The prognostic significance of these changes as predictors of subsequent MS should be investigated longitudinally.

Keywords

electrophysiology fellow eye multiple sclerosis optic neuritis subclinical VEP

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 Filippi M Rocca M . MRI evidence for multiple sclerosis as a diffuse disease of the central nervous system. J Neurol 2005; 252(Suppl.): v16–v24.

2 Allen IV McQuaid S Mirakhur M Nevin G . Pathological abnormalities in the normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci 2001; 22: 141–144.

3 Miller DH Thompson AJ Fillipi M . Magnetisation resonance studies of abnormalities in the normal appearing white matter and grey matter in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2003; 250: 1407–1419.

4 Fernando K Tozer DJ Miszkiel KA . Magnetization transfer histograms in clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Brain 2005; 128: 2911–2925.

5 Iannucci G Tortorella C Rovaris N Sormani MP Comi G Fillipi M . Prognostic value of MR and magnetization transfer imaging findings in patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis at presentation. Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 1034–1038.

6 Tintore M Rovira A Rio J . Is optic neuritis more benign than other first attacks in multiple sclerosis? Ann Neurol 2005; 57: 210–215.

7 Waxman SG . Retinal involvement in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2007; 69: 1562–1563.

8 Beck RW Kupersmith MJ Cleary PA Katz B . Fellow eye abnormalities in acute unilateral optic neuritis. Ophthalmology 1992; 100: 691–698.

9 Yiannikas C Walsh JC . The variation of the pattern shift visual evoked response with the size of the stimulus field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983; 55: 427–435.

10.

10 Daniel P Whittridge D . The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys. J Physiol 1961; 159: 203–221.

11.

11 Riggs LA Wooten BR . Electrical measures and psychophysical data on human vision. In: D Jameson LM Hurvich , (eds), Handbook of sensory physiology. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1972. p. 690–731.

12.

12 Baseler HA Sutter EE Klein SA Carney T . The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 90: 65–81.

13.

13 Hood DC Zhang X Greenstein VC . An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 1580–1587.

14.

14 Klistorner AI Graham SL Grigg JR Billson FA . Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39: 937–950.

15.

15 Fraser C Klistorner A Graham SL Garrick R Billson F Grigg JR . Multifocal visual evoked potential latency analysis: predicting progression to multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 2006; 63: 846–850.

16.

16 Klistorner A Fraser C Garrick R Graham SL Arvind H . Correlation between full-field and multifocal VEPs in optic neuritis. Doc Ophthalmol 2007; 116: 19–27.

17.

17 Klistorner A Graham SL Fraser C . Electrophysiological evidence for heterogeneity of lesions in optic neuritis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 4549–4556.

18.

18 Hood DC Odel JG Zhang X . Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: a multifocal VEP study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 4032–4038.

19.

19 Klistorner A Arvind H Nguyen T . Inflammation, demyelination and axonal loss in post-acute optic neuritis. Ann Neurol 2008; 61: 325–331.

20.

20 Beck RW Trobe JD Moke PS . High- and low-risk profiles for the development of multiple sclerosis within 10 years after optic neuritis: experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121: 944–949.

21.

21 Klistorner A Graham SL . Electroencephalogram-based scaling of multifocal visual evoked potentials: effect on intersubject amplitude variability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 2145–2152.

22.

22 Graham SL Klistorner A . The diagnostic significance of the multifocal pattern visual evoked potential in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1999; 10: 140–146.

23.

23 Brusa A Jones SJ Plant GT . Long-term remyelination after optic neuritis. Brain 2001; 124: 468–479.

24.

24 Jones SJ Brusa A . Neurophysiological evidence for long-term repair of MS lesions: implications for axon protection. J Neurol Sci 2003; 206: 193–198.