`Fighting for everything': service experiences of people severely affected by multiple sclerosis

Abstract

Background No previous research exists specifically exploring the needs of those people severely affected by multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with people identified by the referring health or social care professional as being severely affected by their MS and informal carers, in order to explore their perceptions of their illness and care. The data were analysed for themes using the constant comparative approach.

Results The data relate to 32 people severely affected by MS, who identified several broad themes, relating to loss and change, and provision of services and care. In relation to service provision, people with MS (PwMS) and their carers identified two, interlinked themes - a lack of continuity and co-ordination of care, and a lack of information about services, aids and adaptations, welfare benefits and end-of-life issues. A further theme was identified, which underpinned and linked the two other themes, that of `fighting for everything' - a sense that people had to struggle for their needs to be met.

Conclusion There is a need to develop models of care in order to better meet patients and carers needs for information, co-ordination, and to reduce the feeling of struggling to receive services. Multiple Sclerosis 2007; 13: 660-667. http://msj.sagepub.com

Keywords

communication continuity of care information multiple sclerosis palliative care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Compston A. , Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2002; 359: 1221-31.

O'Hara L. , de Souza L. , Ide L. The nature ofl care giving in a community sample ofl people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 1401-10.

Wollin J. , Yates PM , Kristjanson LJ Supportive and palliative care needs identified by multiple sclerosis patients and their flamilies. Int J Palliat Nurs 2006 ; 12: 20-26.

Robinson I. , Hunter M. , Neilson S. A dispatch from the frontline: the views of people with multiple sclerosis about their needs. A qualitative approach. Report flor the Multiple Sclerosis Society. Brunel MS Research Unit , 1996.

Robinson I. , Hunter M. Views from the other side: everyday perspectives on living and working with people with MS by those concerned with their informal and formal (health) care. A qualitative approach. Report flor the Multiple Sclerosis Society. Brunel MS Research Unit, 1998.

MS Society of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Are we being served? Health care experiences of people with MS. MS Society, 2000.

Weinschenker BG , Rice GP , Noseworthy JH , Carriere W. , Baskerville J. , Ebers GC The natural history ofl multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 3. Multivariate analysis ofl predictive flactors and models ofl outcome. Brain 1991; 114: 1045-56.

Pope C. , Mays N. Qualitative research in health care, second edition. BMJ Books, 2000.

Glaser BG , Strauss AL The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Press, 1967.

10.

Sharrack B. , Hughes Rac. The Guy's Neurological Disability Scale (GNDS): a new disability measure flor multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 1999; 5: 223-33.

11.

National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Multiple sclerosis: management in primary and secondary care. NICE,2003.

12.

The Neurological Alliance , 2002. Quality services for people with neurological conditions. Retrieved flrom http://www.neural.org.uk/pages/online_ordering/LevellingUp.asp

13.

Freeman J. , Ford H. , Mattison P. , Thompson A. , Clark F. , Ridley J. et al. Developing MS Healthcare standards: evidence-based recommendations for service providers. A joint publication by the Multiple Sclerosis Society ofl Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the MS Proflessional Network, 2002. Retrieved flrom http://www.mssociety.org.uk/what_is_ms/publications_shop/devel_ms_hlthc.html

14.

Ridley J.A. charter for MS services: the voice of people affected by MS. Multiple Sclerosis Society, 2002. Retrieved flrom http://www.mssociety.org.uk/what_is_ms/publications_shop/charter.html

15.

Thorne S. , Con A. , McGuinness L. , McPherson G. , Harris SR Healthcare communication issues in multiple sclerosis: an interpretive description . Qual Health Res 2004; 14: 5-22.

16.

Somerset M. , Campbell R. , Sharp DJ , Peters TJ

What do people with MS want and expect flrom health-care services?

Health Expect 2001; 4: 29-37.

17.

Freeman JA , Thompson AJ Community services in multiple sclerosis: still a matter ofl chance. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 69: 728-32.

18.

Lawthers AG , Pransky GS , Peterson LE , Himmelsetien JH Rethinking quality in the context ofl persons with disability. Int J Qual Health Care 2003 ; 15: 287-99.

19.

Woodward CA , Abselon J. , Tedford S. , Hutchison B. What is important in continuity ofl home care? Perspectives ofl stakeholders. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 177-92.

20.

Fakhoury Wkh.

Satisflaction with palliative care: what should we be aware ofl?

J R Soc Med 1997; 90: 128-31.

21.

Hinton J. How reliable are relatives' reports ofl terminal illness? Patients and relatives compared. Soc Sci Med 1996; 43: 1229-36.

22.

Field D. , Douglas C. , Jagger C. , Dand P. Terminal illness: views ofl patients and their lay carers. Palliat Med 1995; 9: 45-54.

23.

Philpin SM , Jordan SE , Warring J. Giving people a voice: reflections on conducting interviews with participants experiencing communication impairment. J Adv Nurs 2005; 50: 299-306.