The purpose of this protocol was to investigate the potential benefits and tolerability of locomotor training using body weight support on a treadmill (LTBWST) in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Methods
Four persons with primarily spinal cord MS and severely impaired ambulation (Expanded Disability Status Scale score 7.0–7.5) were enrolled in LTBWST. Subjects completed an average of 40 training sessions over several months.
Results
Subjects showed improvement in muscle strength, spasticity, endurance, balance, walking speed, and quality of life at the end of the training sessions, and could tolerate training without fatigue or other adverse effects.
Conclusions
LTBWST is well tolerated by persons with MS and may produce improvements in parameters related to functional mobility. Multiple Sclerosis 2007; 13: 224–231. http://msj.sagepub.com
FreemanJA. Improving mobility and functional independence in persons with MS.J Neurol2001; 248: 255–59.
2.
WeinshenkerBG, BassB, RiceG, NoseworthyJ, CarriereW, BaskervilleJ. The natural history of MS: a geographically based study. Clinical course and disability.Brain1989; 112: 133–46.
3.
KornblithA, LaRoccaN, BaumH. Employment in individuals with MS.Int J Rehab Res1986; 9: 155–65.
4.
JacksonM, QuaalC, ReevesM. Effect of MS on occupational and career patterns.Axone1991; 13: 16–22.
5.
RagnarssonK. Health maintenance and reduction of disability through physical exercise. In AppleD ed. Physical fitness: a guide to individuals with spinal cord injury.Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, 1996.
6.
BarbeauH, WainbergM, FinchL. Description and application of a system for locomotor rehabilitation.Med Biol Eng Comput1987; 25: 341–44.
7.
HarkemaS. Neural plasticity after human spinal cord injury: application of locomotor training to the rehabilitation of walking.Neuroscientist2001; 7: 455–68.
8.
FinchL, BarbeauH, ArsenaultB. Influence of body weight support on normal human gait: development of a retraining strategy.Phys Ther1991; 71: 842–56.
9.
VisinitinM, BarbeauH. The effects of body weight support on the locomotor pattern of spastic paretic patients.Can J Neurol Sci1989; 16: 315–25.
10.
WernigA, MullerS. Laufband locomotion with body weight support improved walking in persons with severe spinal cord injuries.Paraplegia1992; 30: 229–38.
11.
WernigA, MullerS, NanassyA, CagolE. Laufband therapy based on ‘rules of spinal locomotion’ is effective in spinal cord injured persons.Eur J Neurosci1995; 7: 823–29.
12.
WernigA, NanassyA, MullerS. Maintenance of locomotor abilities following Laufband therapy in para and tetraplegic persons: follow-up studies.Spinal Cord1998; 36: 744–48.
13.
WirzM, ColomboG, DietzV. Long term effects of locomotor training in spinal humans.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2001; 71: 93–96.
14.
BarbeauH, DanakasM, ArsenaultB. The effects of locomotor training in spinal cord injured subjects - a preliminary study.Restor Neurol Neurosci1993; 5: 81–84.
15.
ProtasE, HolmesA, QureshyH, JohnsonA, LeeD, SherwoodA. Supported treadmill ambulation training after spinal cord injury: a pilot study.Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82: 825–31.
16.
Field-FoteE. Combined use of body weight support, functional electrical stimulation, and treadmill training to improve walking ability in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82: 818–24.
17.
McDonaldWI, CompstonA, EdanG, GoodkinD, HartungHP, LublinFB. Recommended diagnostic criteria for MS: guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of MS.Ann Neurol2001; 50: 121–27.
18.
KurtzkeJF. Rating neurologic impairment in MS: an expanded disability status scale.Neurology1983; 33: 1444–52.
19.
BergKO, MakiJI, WilliamsPJ, HollidayPJ, Wood-DauphineeSL. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population.Arch Phys Med Rehabil1992; 73: 1073–80.
20.
BohannonRW, SmithMB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity.Phys Ther1987; 67: 206–207.
21.
HobartJ, LampingD, FitzpatrickR, RiaziA, ThompsonA. The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS): a new patient based outcome measure.Brain2001; 124: 962–73.
22.
StevensonTJ. Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg Balance Scale.Aust J Physiother2001; 47: 29–38.
23.
Van den BergM, DawesH, WadeDT, NewmanM, BurridgeJ, IzadiH. Treadmill training for individuals with MS: a pilot randomized trial.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2006; 77: 531–33.
24.
FreemanJA, LangdonD, HobartJ, ThompsonA. Inpatient rehabilitation in MS: do the benefits carry over into the community?Neurology1999; 52: 50–56.
25.
SolariA, FillipiniG, GascoP, CollaL, SalmaggiA, LaMantiaL. Physical rehabilitation has a positive effect on disability in MS patients.Neurology1999; 52: 57–62.
26.
PattiF, CiancoM, CacopardoM, ReggioE, FiorillaT, PalermoF. effects of a short outpatient rehabilitation treatment on disability of MS patients.J Neurol2003; 250: 861-66.
27.
WhiteL, DressendorferR. Exercise and MS.Sports Med2004; 34: 1077–100.
28.
PonichteraJ, MatthewsT, BarettP, GlaserRM. Changes in aerobic fitness of patients with MS during a 6 month training program.Ann Neurol1996; 39: 432–41.
29.
OkenB, KishiyamaS, ZaidelD, BourdetteD, CarlsenJ, HaasM. Randomized controlled trial of yoga and MS after a 6 month training program.Sports Med Train Rehab1997; 7: 265–72.
30.
WhiteLJ, McCoySC, CastellanoV, GutierrezG, StevensJE, WalterGA. Resistance training improves strength and functional capacity in persons with MS.Mult Scler2004; 10: 668–74.
31.
RodgersM, MulcareJ, KingD, MathewsT, GuptaSC, GlaserR. Gait characteristics of individuals with MS before and after a 6 month aerobic training program.J Rehab Res Dev1999; 36: 183–88.
32.
RombergA, VirtanenJ, RuutianenS, AunolaS, KarppiS-L, VaaraM. Effects of a 6 month exercise program on patients with MS: a randomized study.Neurology2004; 63: 2034–38.
33.
PerryJ, GarrettM, GromleyJK, MulroySJ. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population.Stroke1995; 26: 982–89.
34.
MevelleeE, LamotteD, CantaloubeS, AmarencoG, ThounieP. Relationship between gait speed and strength parameters in MS.Ann Readapt Med Phys2003; 46: 85–90.
35.
TillakaraneN, de LeonR, HoangT, RoyR, EdgertonVR, TobinA. Use dependant modulation of inhibitory capacity in the feline spinal cord.J Neurosci2002; 22: 3130–43.
36.
RobinsonG, GoldbergerM. The development and recovery of motor function in spinal cats. Part II: pharmacologic enhancement of recovery.Exp Brain Res1986; 62: 387–400.
DietzV, ColomboG, JensenL, BaumgartnerL. Locomotor capacity of spinal cord in paraplegic patients.Ann Neurol1995; 37: 574–82.
39.
HarkemaS. Unpublished observations.
40.
PetajanJ, GappmaierE, WhiteA, SpencerMK, MinoL, HicksR. Impact of aerobic training on fitness and quality of life in MS.Ann Neurol1996; 39: 432–41.
41.
MostertS, KesselreingJ. Effects of a short term exercise training program on aerobic fitness, fatigue health perception and activity level of subjects with MS.Mult Scler2002; 8: 161–68.
42.
PittockS, MayrW, McClelandRL, JorgensenN, WeigandS, NoseworthyJ. Quality of life is favorable for most patients with MS: a population based cohort study.Arch Neurol2004; 61: 679–86.
43.
IsakssonA-K, AhlstromG, GunnarssonL-G. Quality of life and impairment in MS.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2005; 76: 64–69.
44.
ForssbergH. On integrative motor functions in the cat spinal cord.Acta Physiol Scand1979; 474: 1–56.
45.
GrillnerS, ZanggerP. How detailed is the central pattern generation for locomotion?Brain Res1975; 88: 367–71.
46.
McCreaD. Spinal circuitry of sensorimotor control of locomotion.J Physiol2001; 53: 41–50.
47.
EdgertonV, GrillnerS, SjostromA, ZanggerP. Central generation of locomotion in vertebrates. In: HermanS, GrillnerS, SteinP, StuartDG eds. Neural control of locomotion.Plenum Press, 1976: 439–64.
48.
GrillnerS, DubucR. Control of locomotion in vertebrates: spinal and supraspinal mechanisms. In: WaxmanSG ed. Advances in Neurology. Volume 47: Functional recovery in neurologic disease.Raven Press, 1988: 425–53.
49.
BusselB, Roby-BramiA, NerisOR, YakovleffA. Evidence for a spinal stepping generator in man. Electrophysiological study.Acta Neurobiol Exp1996; 56: 465–68.
50.
DimitrijevicM, GerasimenkoY, PinterM. Evidence for a spinal central pattern generator in humans.Ann NY Acad Sci1998; 860: 360–76.
51.
BeresJA, JoaquinR, LukacsR, van den BrandR, SchoutenW, GordonK. Neural plasticity of the human spinal cord occurs with locomotor training.Soc Neurosci Abstracts2001; 27: 935.14.
52.
DobkinB, HarkemaS, RequejoP, EdgertonVR. Modulation of locomotor like EMG activity in subjects with complete and incomplete spinal cord injury.J Neurol Rehab1995; 9: 183–90.
53.
HarkemaS, DobkinB, EdgertonV. Pattern generations in locomotion: implications for recovery of walking after spinal cord injury.Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil2000; 6: 82–96.
54.
HarkemaS, HurlyeS, PatelU, RequejoP, DobkinB, EdgertonVR. Human lumbosacral spinal cord interprets loading during stepping.J Neurophysiol1997; 77:797–811.
55.
NielsenJ. How we walk: central control of muscle activity during human walking.Neuroscientist2003; 9: 195–204.
56.
MikulisD, JurkiewiczM, McilroyW, StainesW, RickardsL, Kalsi-RyanS. Adaptation in the motor cortex following cervical spinal cord injury.Neurology2002; 58: 794–801.
57.
CorbettaM, BurtonH, SinclairR, ConturoT, AkbudakE, McDonaldJ. Functional reorganization and stability of somatosensory-motor cortical topography in a tetraplegic subject with late recovery.Proc Natl Acad Sci2002; 99: 17066–71.
58.
FilippiM, RoccaM. Disturbed function and plasticity in MS as gleaned from fMRI.Curr Opin Neurol2003; 16: 275–82.
RoccaM, FuliniA, ColomboB, ScottiG, ComiG, FilippiM. Adaptive functional changes in the cerebral cortex of patients with non-disabling MS correlate with the extent of brain structural damage.Ann Neurol2002; 51: 330–39.
61.
FukuyamaH, OuchiY, MatsuzakiS, NagahamaY, YamauchiH, Ogawa. Brain functional activity during gait in normal subjects: a SPECT study.Neurosci Lett1997; 228: 183–86.
62.
DobkinB, FirestineA, WestM, SaremiK, WoodsR. Ankle dorsiflexion as an fMRI paradigm to assay motor control for walking during rehabilitation.Neuroimage2004; 23: 370–81.
63.
WinchesterP, McCollR, QuerryR, ForemanN, MosbyJ, TanseyK. Changes in supraspinal activation patterns following robotic locomotor therapy in motor incomplete SCI.Neurorehabil Neural Repair2005; 19: 313–24.
