Prediction of Sound Level in Rooms and Experimental Validation

Abstract

Traditional Sabine equations still are used for factories or offices where diffuse sound fields rarely occur and prediction can be inaccurate. More recently, methods based on geometric acoustics have been developed which require large computing time and which demand better defined input data. A problem, often encountered, is how to include input data which is appropriate, accurate and relatively easy to obtain. Three acoustic models of a furnished room were created: a diffuse field, an image source and a ray tracing model. The initial values of absorption coefficient and sound power level were obtained by standard measurements and the sound propagation SP was predicted and compared with measurement for each model. Then, the models were calibrated by altering the input parameters in order to minimise the difference between predicted and measured values. Sound pressure level due to two sources was also predicted and compared with measurement.

For the room studied, the precision of the predictions, after calibration, is similar for the three models considered, with an average difference between simulated and measured values of less than 2 dB. Without the calibration procedure, the ray-tracing model gave the most precise first estimate. The diffuse and image source models needed significant modification of the input data to obtain a similar precision. The sound field in the room chosen for this study was nearly diffuse and simulation, based on geometric acoustics, did not offer clear advantages. However, this will not be the case for rooms with more complicated geometrical and acoustic characteristics such as in factories and offices. In addition, the image source model will not be appropriate for internal fittings which are much more complex than in the present study and an appropriate estimate of the scattering cross-section is problematical. In the ray tracing model, this problem is circumvented by incorporating the fittings as part of the geometry of the room.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

VDI-3760: 1996. Berechnung und Messung der Schallausbreitung in Arbeitsräumen.

Vorlander

, 1995, “International round robin on room acoustical computer simulations”, Proc. 15th ICA, 689.

Stephenson

, 1996, “A quantized pyramidal beam tracing”, Acustica, 82, 518.

Meng

X.W.

De Borger

Van Overmeire

, 1995, “Numerical simulation of the acoustical behavior of rooms using RAYNOISE”, Proc. Euro-noise 95, (1), 121.

Pleek

De Geest

, 1996, “The practical application of a ray tracing program in industrial noise control”, Proc. Euro-noise 95 (1), 43.

Beranek

, 1988, “Noise and Vibration Control”.

Hodgson

, 1989, “Case history: Factory noise prediction using ray tracing – experimental validation and the effectiveness of noise control measures”, Noise Control Eng. J., 33–39.

Ondet

A.M.

Barbry

J.L.

, 1988, “Sound propagation in fitted rooms – Comparison of different models”, J. Sound Vib, 125(1), 137–149.

Hodgson

, 1988, “On the prediction of sound fields in large empty rooms”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 84(1), 253.

10.

Vorlander

, 1989, “Simulation of the transient and steady-state sound propagation in rooms using a new combined ray-tracing/image-source algorithm”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 86, 172.

11.

Lehnert

, 1993, “Systematic errors of the ray-tracing algorithm”, Applied Acoustics, 38, 207.

12.

Maercke Martin . 1993, “The prediction of echograms and impulse responses within the Epidaure software”, Applied Acoustics, 38, 93.

13.

Rindel

J.H.

, 1995, “Computer simulation techniques for acoustical design of rooms”, Acoustics Australia. 23(3), 81.

14.

Farina

A.F.

, 1995, “RAMSETE – A new pyramid tracer for medium and large scale acoustic problems”, Proc. Euro-noise 95, 55.

15.

Kuttruff

, 1991, “Room Acoustics”, 3rd edition.

16.

Hodgson

M.R.

, 1996, “Predicting frequency varying fitting density and absorption coefficient in industrial workrooms”, Proc. Inter-noise 96, 687.