A Preliminary Study for a ‘Music Intelligibility’ Test for Rooms

Abstract

In order to get more useable evaluations of the acoustics of rooms for music it would seem to be important to have a test which is the musical equivalent of a speech intelligibility test. This paper reports on several experiments carried out to find the effects of sound pressure level difference on duration discrimination using pairs of tones with a view to using this as a possible basis for such a test. Experiments were also carried out to evaluate the relative contribution of amplitude envelopes on the perception of sound duration.

Pairs of signals were presented with the difference in SPL, shape of rise/decay, and duration. Duration judgements for the signals were investigated together with those of the standard stiniuli. From the results of experiments, it was found that the duration discrimination tasks are affected by a SPL difference of more than 3 dB. It appears that the more information a signal carries the more effect there is on duration judgement, i.e., the more the signal envelope is modulated in a space by the presence of room acoustic parameters the greater the difficulty in determining the duration of the sounds in music or speech. From the results it would seem that discrimination between sounds could form a useful measure of how good a room is for musical performances.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abel

S.M.

(1972). “Duration discrimination of noise and tone bursts”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 51, 1219–1223.

Abel

S. M.

, and Kunov

(1983). “Lateralization based on interaural phase differences – Effects of frequency, amplitude, duration, and shape of rise decay,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73, 955–960.

Berglund

, Berglund

, Ekman

, and Frankenhaeuser

(1969). “The influence of auditory stimulus intensity on apparent duration,” Scand. J. Psychol. 10, 21–26.

Campbell

R. A.

, and Counter

S. A.

(1969). “Temporal integration and periodicity pitch,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 45, 691–693.

Carbotte

R. M.

, and Kristofferson

A. B.

(1973). “On energy dependent cues in duration discrimination,” 14, 501–505.

Creelman

C.D.

(1962). “Human discrimination of auditory duration,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34, 582–593.

Creelman

C.D.

(1963). “Detection discrimination, and the loudness of short tones,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35, 1201–1205.

Garner

W. R.

, and Miller

G. A.

(1947). “The masked threshold of pure tones as a function of duration,” J. Exp. Psychol. 37, 293–303.

Henry

F.M.

(1948). “Discrimination of the duration of a sound,” J. Exp. Psychol. 38, 734–742.

10.

Jeon

J. Y.

, and Fricke

F. R.

(1995). “The effect of frequency on duration judgements,” Acustica 81, To be published.

11.

McFadden

(1975). “Duration-intensity reciprocity for equal-loudness,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 57, 702–704.

12.

Miller

G.A.

(1948). “The perception of short burst of noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 20, 160–170.

13.

Plomp

(1964). “Rate of decay of auditory sensation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 36, 277–282.

14.

Plomp

, and Bouman

M. A.

(1959). “Relation between hearing threshold and duration for tone pulses,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 31, 749–758.

15.

Richards

A.M.

(1977). “Loudness perception for short-duration tones in masking noise,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 20, 684–693.

16.

Small

A. M.

, Brandt

J. F.

, and Cox

P. G.

(1962). “Loudness as a function of signal duration,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34, 513–514.

17.

Watson

C. S.

, and Gengel

R. W.

(1969). “Signal duration and signal frequency in relation to auditory sensitivity,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 46, 989–997.

18.

Zwicker

, Flottorp

, and Stevens

S. S.

(1957). “Critical band width in loudness summation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29, 548–557.

19.

Zwislocki

J.J.

(1960). “Theory of temporal auditory summation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 32, 1046–1060.

20.

Zwislocki

J.J.

(1969). “Temporal summation of loudness: an analysis,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 46, 431–441.