Construction defects, even visually untraceable, can forfeit the acoustic performance of systems. The execution of the systems is a parameter that is hard to control. This article aims to evaluate construction defects. Wall system samples of real proportions were made with induced defects. In comparison with the reference, reductions of 1 dB were found for the samples with defective gaps above the wall and 2 dB for the trials with no vertical filling. Regarding the samples with installations, this reduction reached 1 and 3 dB for samples with installation of electrical junction boxes at the same face and two on each face, respectively.
BallouG.Handbook for sound engineers. Oxford: Taylor & Francis, 2008.
2.
MateusDMRPereiraASC. Influência de pequenos erros de execução em obra no desempenho acústico de edifícios: exemplos típicos. In: Proceedings of the TecniAcustica, Cáceres, 2011. Sociedad Española de Acústica, http://www.sea-acustica.es/fileadmin/Caceres11/Caceres11_AED005.pdf
3.
CraikRJMEvansDI. The effect of workmanship on sound transmission through buildings: part 2–structure-borne sound. Appl Acoust1989; 27: 137–145.
4.
BarrettK.Defective construction work. UK: Blackwell Publishing:John Wiley Sons, 2009.
5.
FaustiPIngelaereBSteelCet al. Common errors during construction of new buildings and effect of workmanship. In: Proceedings of the European symposium—Harmonization of European sound insulation descriptors and classification standards, Florence, 2010, http://www.acustica-aia.it/AIA_EAA_COST_FLORENCE_2010/pdf14/EAA-COST_2010_07.pdf
6.
PetersRJSmithBJHollinsM.Acoustics and noise control. 3rd ed.New York: Taylor & Francis, 2013.
DemirkaleSYAscigil-DincerM.Retrofitting masonry and cavity brick façades for different noise zones using laboratory measurements. Build Acoust2017; 24: 77–100.
9.
CarrascalTFaustiPBeentjesWet al. Common errors and good practice in design and workmanship. In: Birgit Rasmussen & Maria Machimbarrena. COST Action TU0901–Building acoustics throughout Europe. Volume 1: Towards a common framework in building acoustics throughout Europe (EU RTD framework programme), Vienna, 2014, pp. 181–212.
Del ValLMachimbarrenaMHerráezMet al. Translation between existing and proposed harmonized impact sound insulation descriptors and alignment within a proposed common acoustic classification scheme for buildings. Appl Acoust2018; 129: 204–216.
12.
KlippelFSLabresHSOliveiraMFet al. Influence of different mortar coating thicknesses on the acoustic performance of walls. In: Proceedings of the XII SBTA, 22–24 August 2017. São Paulo, Brazil: USP, ANTAC.
13.
ASTM C67-17:2017. Standard test methods for sampling and testing brick and structural clay tile.
14.
CEN EN 1015-6:1998. Methods of test for mortar for masonry—part 6: determination of bulk density of fresh mortar.
15.
CEN EN 1015-10:1999. Methods of test for mortar for masonry—part 10: determination of dry bulk density of hardened mortar.
16.
ISO 10140-2:2010. Acoustics—laboratory measurement of sound insulation of building elements—part 2: measurement of airborne sound insulation.
17.
ISO 10140-4:2010. Acoustics—laboratory measurement of sound insulation of building elements—part 4: measurement procedures and requirements.
18.
GompertsMCKihlmanT.The sound transmission loss of circular and slit-shaped apertures in walls. Acustica1967; 18: 144–150.
19.
JonesRE.How to accurately predict the sound insulation of partitions. Sound Vib1976; 10: 14–25.
20.
FringuellinoMSmithRS.Sound transmission through hollow brick walls. Build Acoust1999; 6: 211–224.
21.
SugieSYoshimuraJIwaseT.Effect of inserting a Helmholtz resonator on sound insulation in a double-leaf partition cavity. Acoust Sci Technol2009; 30: 317–326.
22.
WangX.Theory of resonant sound transmission through small apertures on periodically perforated slabs. J Appl Phys2010; 108: 064903.
