ISO 12913-1:2014. Acoustics – Soundscape – Part 1: definition and conceptual framework.
2.
SouthworthM.The sonic environment of cities. Environ Behav1969; 1(1): 49–70.
3.
SchaferRM.The tuning of the world. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1977.
4.
TruaxB.Handbook for acoustic ecology. Vancouver, BC, Canada: ARC Publications, 1978.
5.
AlettaFKangJAxelssonÖ.Soundscape descriptors and a conceptual framework for developing predictive soundscape models. Landscape Urban Plan2016; 149: 65–74.
6.
Schulte-FortkampBDuboisD.Preface to the special issue: recent advances in soundscape research. Acta Acustica United Acustica2006; 92: 1–8.
7.
Schulte-FortkampBKangJ.Introduction to the special issue on soundscapes. J Acoust Soc Am2013; 134(1): 765–766.
8.
DaviesWJ.Editorial to the special issue: applied soundscapes. Appl Acoust2013; 74: 223.
9.
KangJAlettaFGjestlandTTet al. Ten questions on the soundscapes of the built environment. Build Environ2016; 108: 284–294.
10.
van den BoschKA. Safe and sound: soundscape research in special needs care. Groningen: University of Groningen, 2015.
11.
LindborgP.A taxonomy of sound sources in restaurants. Appl Acoust2016; 110: 297–310.
12.
LindborgPFribergA.Personality traits bias the perceived quality of sonic environments. Appl Sci2016; 6(12): 405.
13.
Dokmeci YorukogluPNKangJ. Analysing sound environment and architectural characteristics of libraries through indoor soundscape framework. Archiv Acoust2016; 41(2): 203–212.
14.
XiaoJAlettaF.A soundscape approach to exploring design strategies for acoustic comfort in modern public libraries: a case study of the Library of Birmingham. Noise Map2016; 3(1): 264–273.
15.
AlettaFBotteldoorenDThomasPet al. Monitoring sound levels and soundscape quality in the living rooms of nursing homes: a case study in Flanders (Belgium). Appl Sci2017; 7(9): 874.
16.
Dokmeci YorukogluPNKangJ. Development and testing of Indoor Soundscape Questionnaire for evaluating contextual experience in public spaces. Build Acous2017; 24(4): 307–324.
17.
Dokmeci YorukogluPNAburawisAA. An integrated framework on soundscape perception and spatial experience by adapting post-occupancy evaluation methodology. Build Acoust2018; 25(1): 3–16.
18.
VardaxisNGBardDPersson WayeK.Review of acoustic comfort evaluation in dwellings—Part I: associations of acoustic field data to subjective responses from building surveys. Build Acoust2018; 25(2): 151–170.
19.
VardaxisNBardD.Review of acoustic comfort evaluation in dwellings: Part III—airborne sound data associated to subjective responses in laboratory tests. Build Acoust2018; 25(3) IN PRESS.
20.
VardaxisNGBardD.Review of acoustic comfort evaluation in dwellings: Part II—impact sound data associated with subjective responses in laboratory tests. Build Acoust2018; 25(2): 171–192.
21.
YilmazerSAcunV.A grounded theory approach to assess indoor soundscape in historic religious spaces of Anatolian culture: a case study on Hacı Bayram Mosque. Build Acoust2018; 25(2): 137–150.
22.
AlettaFVander MynsbruggeTVan de VeldeDet al. Awareness of ‘sound’ in nursing homes: a large-scale soundscape survey in Flanders (Belgium). Build Acoust2018; 25(1): 43–59.
23.
Van Den BoschKAAndringaTCPostWJet al. The relationship between soundscapes and challenging behavior: a small-scale intervention study in a healthcare organization for individuals with severe or profound intellectual disabilities. Build Acoust2018; 25(2): 123–135.
24.
RossiLPratoALesinaLet al. Effects of low-frequency noise on human cognitive performances in laboratory. Build Acoust2018; 25(1): 17–33.
25.
LamAHodgsonMProdiNet al. Effects of classroom acoustics on speech intelligibility and response time: a comparison between native and non-native listeners. Build Acoust2018; 25(1): 35–42.
26.
YilmazerSBoraZ.Understanding the indoor soundscape in public transport spaces: a case study in Akköprü metro station, Ankara. Build Acoust2017; 24(4): 325–339.
27.
FusaroGD’AlessandroFBaldinelliGet al. Design of urban furniture to enhance the soundscape: a case study. Build Acoust2018; 25(1): 61–75.
28.
CalleriCShtrepiLArmandoAet al. Evaluation of the influence of building façades design on the acoustic characteristics and auditory perception of urban spaces. Build Acoust2018; 25(1): 77–95.
29.
D’AlesandroFEvangelistiLGuattariCet al. Influence of visual aspects and other features on the soundscape assessment of a university external area. Build Acoust2018; 25(3) IN PRESS.
30.
Estévez-MaurizLForssénJDohmenM.Is the sound environment relevant for how people use common spaces?Build Acoust2018; 25(3) IN PRESS.
