Lubricants containing nanoparticles have garnered significant attention due to their potential to improve the tribological performance of systems operating in demanding environments. In the current study, the enhanced stability of copper oxide (CuO) and molybdenum disulphide (MoS2) nanoparticles (NPs) and their tribological performance, when used as lubricant additives, were experimentally tested to evaluate their synergistic effect on friction and wear performance. The oleic acid (OA) was used as a surface modifier agent to enhance dispersion stability. The influence of oleic acid on nanoparticle dispersion was evaluated using Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and Zeta Potential (ZP) techniques. The surface of nanoparticles was characterised by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA). The tribological performance of the more stable nanolubricant, including friction reduction and wear resistance, was evaluated using a pin-on-reciprocating plate test rig. Surface characterisation of the wear tracks was performed using White Light Interferometry (WLI), Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (SEM/EDX), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to understand how the improved stability affected the worn surfaces and tribofilm properties. NPs stability study confirmed that the best stability could be achieved with concentrations of 1% CuO/MoS2 NPs and 1.5 wt. % OA. Tribology results indicated that CuO and MoS2 NPs individually could reduce friction and wear, whereas their combination exhibited enhanced friction and wear reduction. This synergy in tribological performance has been attributed to the combined effects of nanoparticle size and enhanced dispersion stability, which enable effective nanoparticle entrainment between the contacting surfaces, leading to the formation of a tribofilm that provides anti-wear protection and contributes to friction reduction.
KrishnanlS. A comparative review of the lubrication of bearings in wind turbines and Spacecraft to address wind turbine bearing failures. Tribol Ind2023; 45: 57.
2.
WuYTsuiWLiuT. Experimental analysis of tribological properties of lubricating oils with nanoparticle additives. Wear2007; 262: 819–825.
3.
GulzarMMasjukiHKalamM, et al.Tribological performance of nanoparticles as lubricating oil additives. J Nanopart Res2016; 18: 23.
4.
WongKLuXCotterJ, et al.Surface and friction characterization of MoS2 and WS2 third body thin films under simulated wheel/rail rolling–sliding contact. Wear2008; 264: 526–534.
5.
DaiWKheireddinBGaoH, et al.Roles of nanoparticles in oil lubrication. Tribol Int2016; 102: 88–98.
6.
AlvesSCunhaRMorinaA. Tribological behaviour of cuo@ rgo nanoparticles under different slide-to-roll. Tribol Lett2025; 73: 1–16.
7.
AlvesSMSilva e MelloVSinatoraA. Nanolubrication mechanisms: influence of size and concentration of CuO nanoparticles. Mater Perform Charact2018; 7: 226–241.
8.
LópezTD-FGonzálezAFDel RegueroÁ, et al.Engineered silica nanoparticles as additives in lubricant oils. Sci Technol Adv Mater2015; 16: 055005.
NooriAASHusseinHANamerNS. Influence of adding CuO and MoS2 nano-particles to castor oil and moulding oil on tribological properties. In: IOP Conference series: materials science and engineering. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing, 2019, pp.032040.
11.
WuHLiXHeX, et al.An investigation on the lubrication mechanism of MoS2 nanoparticles in unidirectional and reciprocating sliding point contact: the flow pattern effect around contact area. Tribol Int2018; 122: 38–45.
12.
KoshyCPRajendrakumarPKThottackkadMV. Evaluation of the tribological and thermo-physical properties of coconut oil added with MoS2 nanoparticles at elevated temperatures. Wear2015; 330-331: 288–308.
13.
BukvićMGajevićSSkulićA, et al.Tribological application of nanocomposite additives in industrial oils. Lubricants2024; 12: 6.
ChuSParkCShenG. Structural characteristic correlated to the electronic band gap in mo S 2. Phys Rev B2016; 94: 020101.
16.
WaqasMZahidRBhuttaM, et al.A review of friction performance of lubricants with nano additives. Materials (Basel)2021; 14: 6310.
17.
ChoiYLeeCHwangY, et al.Tribological behavior of copper nanoparticles as additives in oil. Curr Appl Phys2009; 9: e124–e127.
18.
WaqasMZahidRBhuttaMU, et al.A review of friction performance of lubricants with nano additives. Materials (Basel)2021; 14: 6310.
19.
GhaedniaHJacksonRL. The effect of nanoparticles on the real area of contact, friction, and wear. J Tribol2013; 135: 041603.
20.
JazaaYSundararajanS. Influence of surfactants on the tribological behavior of nanoparticle additives under boundary lubrication conditions. Arab J Sci Eng2021; 46: 7967–7975.
21.
Abdel-RehimAAAklSElsoudyS. Investigation of the tribological behavior of mineral lubricant using copper oxide nano additives. Lubricants2021; 9: 16.
22.
ZhangHYangYSuY, et al.Triboelectric nanogenerator for harvesting vibration energy in full space and as self-powered acceleration sensor. Adv Funct Mater2014; 24: 1401–1407.
23.
GhadimiAMetselaarIH. The influence of surfactant and ultrasonic processing on improvement of stability, thermal conductivity and viscosity of titania nanofluid. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2013; 51: 1–9.
24.
GulzarMMasjukiHVarmanM, et al.Improving the AW/EP ability of chemically modified palm oil by adding CuO and MoS2 nanoparticles. Tribol Int2015; 88: 271–279.
25.
AlvesSMMelloVFariaE, et al.Nanolubricants developed from tiny CuO nanoparticles. Tribol Int2016; 100: 263–271.
26.
QiuSZhouZDongJ, et al.Preparation of Ni nanoparticles and evaluation of their tribological performance as potential additives in oils. J Trib2001; 123: 441–443.
27.
AlvesSMBarrosBSTrajanoMF, et al.Tribological behavior of vegetable oil-based lubricants with nanoparticles of oxides in boundary lubrication conditions. Tribol Int2013; 65: 28–36.
28.
YuWXieH. A review on nanofluids: preparation, stability mechanisms, and applications. J Nanomater2012; 2012: 435873.
29.
HamrockBJDowsonD. Isothermal elastohydrodynamic lubrication of point contacts: part III—fully flooded results. New York, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 1977.
30.
ErrichelloRMullerJ. Application requirements for wind turbine gearboxes. In: National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL). Golden, CO (United States): GEARTECH, 1994.
31.
OmarAASSalehiFMFarooqU, et al.Chemical and physical assessment of engine oils degradation and additive depletion by soot. Tribol Int2021; 160: 107054.
32.
ChastainJKingRC Jr. Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA: Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Physical Electronics Division, 1992.
MecozziMPietrolettiMScarpinitiM, et al.Monitoring of marine mucilage formation in Italian seas investigated by infrared spectroscopy and independent component analysis. Environ Monit Assess2012; 184: 6025–6036.
35.
JavedMShaikAHKhanTA, et al.Synthesis of stable waste palm oil based CuO nanofluid for heat transfer applications. Heat Mass Transfer2018; 54: 3739–3745.
36.
HarrisRAShumbulaPMvan der WaltHt. Analysis of the interaction of surfactants oleic acid and oleylamine with iron oxide nanoparticles through molecular mechanics modeling. Langmuir2015; 31(13): 3934–3943.
37.
ElsoudySAklSAbdel-RehimAA, et al.Synergistic enhancement of tribological behavior and colloidal stability in CuO nanolubricants via ligand tuning. Lubricants2025; 13: 58.
38.
ZhangLHeRGuH-C. Oleic acid coating on the monodisperse magnetite nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci2006; 253: 2611–2617.
39.
KaruppuchamySJeongJM. Synthesis of nano-particles of TiO2 by simple aqueous route. J Oleo Sci2006; 55: 263–266.
40.
LiC-CChangM-H. Colloidal stability of CuO nanoparticles in alkanes via oleate modifications. Mater Lett2004; 58: 3903–3907.
41.
BenjamineMRahmanA. Structural, morphological and optical properties of CuO nanoparticles prepared through chemical method. J Emerg Technol Innov Res2018; 5: 273–278.
42.
WuLZhangYYangG, et al.Tribological properties of oleic acid-modified zinc oxide nanoparticles as the lubricant additive in poly-alpha olefin and diisooctyl sebacate base oils. RSC Adv2016; 6: 69836–69844.
43.
Mariño FernándezF.Design and Characterization of Lubricants Based on Functionalized Nanoparticles. thesis, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela,2023.
44.
GaoYChenGOliY, et al.Study on tribological properties of oleic acid-modified TiO2 nanoparticle in water. Wear2002; 252: 454–458.
45.
YangKPengHWenY, et al.Re-examination of characteristic FTIR spectrum of secondary layer in bilayer oleic acid-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci2010; 256: 3093–3097.
46.
WuPLiWLiuZ, et al.Preparation and tribological properties of oleic acid-decorated MoS2 nanosheets with good oil dispersion. J Dispersion Sci Technol2018; 39: 1742–1751.
47.
HarikrishnanSKalaiselvamS. Preparation and thermal characteristics of CuO–oleic acid nanofluids as a phase change material. Thermochim Acta2012; 533: 46–55.
48.
LiuTQinJWangJ, et al.On the tribological properties of RGO–MoS2 composites surface modified by oleic acid. Tribol Lett2022; 70: 14.
49.
WuXGongKZhaoG, et al.Surface modification of MoS2 nanosheets as effective lubricant additives for reducing friction and wear in poly-α-olefin. Ind Eng Chem Res2018; 57: 8105–8114.
50.
MaheswaranRSunilJ. Effect of nano sized garnet particles dispersion on the viscous behavior of extreme pressure lubricant oil. J Mol Liq2016; 223: 643–651.
51.
KumarVDhanolaAGargH, et al.Improving the tribological performance of canola oil by adding CuO nanoadditives for steel/steel contact. Mater Today Proc2020; 28: 1392–1396.
52.
AzmanNFSamionS. Dispersion stability and lubrication mechanism of nanolubricants: a review. Int J Precis Eng Manuf - Green Technol2019; 6: 393–414.
53.
AshrafAShafiWKUl HaqMI, et al.Dispersion stability of nano additives in lubricating oils–an overview of mechanisms, theories and methodologies. Tribol - Mater, Surf Interfaces2022; 16: 34–56.
54.
MukherjeeSPariaS. Preparation and stability of nanofluids-a review. IOSR J Mech Civil Eng2013; 9: 63–69.
55.
GulzarMMasjukiHKalamM, et al.Dispersion stability and tribological characteristics of TiO2/SiO2 nanocomposite-enriched biobased lubricant. Tribol Trans2017; 60: 670–680.
56.
Sánchez-LópezJAbadMKolodziejczykL, et al.Surface-modified pd and au nanoparticles for anti-wear applications. Tribol Int2011; 44: 720–726.
57.
WangSChenDHongQ, et al.Surface functionalization of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles for dispersion and tribological applications-a review. J Mol Liq2023: 122821. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2023.122821
58.
HouXJiangHAliMKA, et al.Dispersion behavior assessment of the molybdenum disulfide nanomaterials dispersed into poly alpha olefin. J Mol Liq2020; 311: 113303.
59.
HaoSKlameckiBRamalingamS. Friction measurement apparatus for sheet metal forming. Wear1999; 224: 1–7.
60.
MarinoFLopezERArnosaA, et al.Zno nanoparticles coated with oleic acid as additives for a polyalphaolefin lubricant. J Mol Liq2022; 348: 118401.
61.
SoltanniaBMartin-AlarconLUhrynJ, et al.Enhanced rheological and tribological properties of nanoenhanced greases by tuning interparticle contacts. J Colloid Interface Sci2023; 645: 560–569.
62.
RainaAAnandA. Tribological investigation of diamond nanoparticles for steel/steel contacts in boundary lubrication regime. Appl Nanosci2017; 7: 371–388.
63.
JattiVSSinghT. Copper oxide nano-particles as friction-reduction and anti-wear additives in lubricating oil. J Mech Sci Technol2015; 29: 793–798.
64.
AlvesSMMelloVFariaE, et al.Enhancing Cuo nanolubricant performance using dispersing agents. Tribology International, Elsevier, 2020.
65.
MattilaSLeiroJHeinonenM, et al.Core level spectroscopy of MoS2. Surf Sci2006; 600: 5168–5175.
66.
NieQWangMQiuT, et al.Density functional theory and XPS studies of the adsorption of cyanide on chalcopyrite surfaces. ACS omega2020; 5: 22778–22785.
67.
DaviesPRMorganDJ. Practical guide for x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: Applications to the study of catalysts. J Vac Sci Technol A2020; 38. doi:10.1116/1.5140747.
68.
HisakadoTTsukizoeTYoshikawaH. Lubrication mechanism of solid lubricants in oils. ASME, 1983.
