Brake friction materials play an important role in automobiles to reduce speed and to stop the vehicles. Advances in friction materials were updated to ensure effective performances in braking systems and to provide the maximum safety and comfort. Presently eco-friendly friction materials have been used as a replacement for conventional friction materials. Many synthetic and natural products were identified and claimed as better alternatives to banned toxic materials like asbestos and copper. Friction materials developed from natural products are eco-friendly and assure a great promise when applied in modern vehicles. To develop innovative formulations, basic knowledge of common ingredients and their effects in friction materials was needed. This review focuses mainly on providing detailed information about the common ingredients used, processing methods and the characteristics of brake friction materials.
BijweJ. Composites as friction materials: recent developments in non-asbestos fiber reinforced friction materials - A review. Polym Compos1997; 18: 378–396.
2.
Lenin SingaraveluDVijayRFilipP. Influence of various cashew friction dusts on the fade and recovery characteristics of non-asbestos copper free brake friction composites. Wear2019; 426–427: 1129–1141.
3.
GaoY. Regenerative braking. In: ElgowainyA (ed) Electric, hybrid, and fuel cell vehicles. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2012, pp. 443–450.
4.
CoxRL. Engineered composites the art of friction material development. In: Engineered tribological composites. SAE, USA: Society of Automotive Engineers, 2012: 1–505.
5.
ChanDStachowiakGW. Review of automotive brake friction materials. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automob Eng2004; 218: 953–966.
6.
WahlströmJLeonardiMTuM, et al.A study of the effect of brake pad scorching on tribology and airborne particle emissions. Atmosphere (Basel)2020; 11: 2676.
7.
Lenin SingaraveluDVijayRRahulM. Influence of crab shell on tribological characterization of eco-friendly products based non asbestos brake friction materials. SAE Tech Pap2015. Epub ahead of print 2015;1. DOI: 10.4271/2015-01-2676.
8.
MahaleVBijweJSinhaS. A step towards replacing copper in brake-pads by using stainless steel swarf. Wear2019; 424–425: 133–142.
9.
MahaleVBijweJSinhaS. Efforts towards green friction materials. Tribol Int2019; 136: 196–206.
10.
KumarAPrasadMNVMaitiSK, et al. Asbestos: resource recovery and its waste management. In: Environmental materials and waste: resource recovery and pollution prevention. Amsterdam, Boston: Elsevier Inc., 2016, pp.285–305.
11.
MokhtariMJafariNMohammadiA, et al.Temporal and spatial trends of airborne asbestos fiber concentrations in the urban areas of Yazd, Iran. Int J Environ Sci Technol2019; 16: 2657–2666.
12.
AranganathanNBijweJ. Special grade of graphite in NAO friction materials for possible replacement of copper. Wear2015; 330–331: 515–523.
13.
JangHKoKKimSJ, et al.The effect of metal fibers on the friction performance of automotive brake friction materials. Wear2004; 256: 406–414.
14.
GuHChunKMSongS. The effects of hydrogen on the efficiency of NOx reduction via hydrocarbon-selective catalytic reduction (HC-SCR) at low temperature using various reductants. Int J Hydrogen Energy2015; 40: 9602–9610.
15.
YunRFilipPLuY. Performance and evaluation of eco-friendly brake friction materials. Tribol Int2010; 43: 2010–2019.
16.
MenapaceCLeonardiMMatějkaV, et al.Dry sliding behavior and friction layer formation in copper-free barite containing friction materials. Wear2018; 398–399: 191–200.
17.
MatějkaVFuZKukutschováJ, et al.Jute fibers and powderized hazelnut shells as natural fillers in non-asbestos organic non-metallic friction composites. Mater Des2013; 51: 847–853.
18.
ValottoGZannoniDGuerrieroP, et al.Characterization of road dust and resuspended particles close to a busy road of Venice mainland (Italy). Int J Environ Sci Technol2019; 16: 6513–6526.
19.
RomehAAA. Risk assessment of heavy metals pollution at Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. Int J Environ Sci Technol2018; 15: 1393–1410.
20.
CijiPPBijoy NandanS. Toxicity of copper and zinc to Puntius parrah (Day, 1865). Mar Environ Res2014; 93: 38–46.
21.
Baskara SethupathiPChandradassJSaibalajiMA. Comparative study of disc brake pads sold in Indian market — impact on safety and environmental aspects. Environ Technol Innov2021; 21: 101245.
22.
ChoMHKimSJKimD, et al.Effects of ingredients on tribological characteristics of a brake lining: an experimental case study. Wear2005; 258: 1682–1687.
23.
MutluIEldoganOFindikF. Tribological properties of some phenolic composites suggested for automotive brakes. Tribol Int2006; 39: 317–325.
24.
JaraDCJangH. Synergistic effects of the ingredients of brake friction materials on friction and wear: a case study on phenolic resin and potassium titanate. Wear2019; 430–431: 222–232.
25.
AndersonAE. Friction, lubrication and wear technology. ASM Handb1992; 8: 569–577.
26.
ParkSH. Types and health hazards of fibrous materials used as asbestos substitutes. Saf Health Work2018; 9: 360–364.
27.
ErikssonMBergmanFJacobsonS. On the nature of tribological contact in automotive brakes. Wear2002; 252: 26–36.
28.
KamiokaNTokumuraHYoshinoT. Friction material containing BT resin dust. Patent 5384344, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1995.
29.
LideDRKehiaianH V. CRC Handbook of thermophysical and thermochemical data. Boca Raton, Florida: Crc Press, 1994, p.26. Epub ahead of print 1994. DOI: 10.5860/choice.32-5143.
30.
ÖktemHAkıncıoğluSUygurİ, et al.A novel study of hybrid brake pad composites: new formulation, tribological behaviour and characterisation of microstructure. Plast Rubber Compos2021; 50: 249–261.
31.
KomoriTMiyakeSSenooY. Brake friction material. Patent 4954536, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1990.
32.
BlauPJ. Compositions, functions, and testing of friction brake materials and their additives; TOPICAL. USA: Oak Ridge National Lab., 2001.
33.
XiaoXYinYBaoJ, et al.Review on the friction and wear of brake materials. Adv Mech Eng2016; 8: 1–10.
34.
KimuraKGotoYToriiN, et al. Friction material for dampers and process for producing the same. Patent 5830566, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1998.
35.
LideDRKehiaianH V. CRC Handbook of thermophysical and thermochemical data. Boca Raton, Florida: Crc Press, 1994. p.30. Epub ahead of print 1994.
36.
ThiyagarajanVKalaichelvanKSrinivasanK, et al.Influence of specific heat capacity on hybrid non-asbestos brake pad formulation. J Balk Tribol Assoc2015; 21: 102–119.
37.
TewariUSBijweJ. Recent developments in tribology of fibre reinforced composites with thermoplastic and thermosetting matrices. 1st ed. Composite Material Series 1993; 8: 159–207. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-89079-5.50009-X.
38.
Raj JeganmohanSGnanaraj SolomonDChristyTV. Effect of two different rubbers as secondary binders on the friction and wear characteristics of non-asbestos organic (NAO) brake friction materials. Tribol - Mater Surf Interfaces2018; 12: 71–84.
39.
ÖsterleWDmitrievAI. The role of solid lubricants for brake friction materials. Lubricants2016; 4: 1–22.
40.
ManoharanSVijayRLenin SingaraveluD, et al.Experimental investigation on the tribo-thermal properties of brake friction materials containing various forms of graphite: a comparative study. Arab J Sci Eng2019; 44: 1459–1473.
41.
BooherBV. Pultrusion method of making brake linings. Patent 5156787, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1992.
42.
KobayashiM. Non-asbestos friction materials. Patent 6413622, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 2002.
43.
SundarkrishnaaKL. Friction material composites: copper-/metal-free material design perspective. New York: Springer, 2015.
44.
ÖktemHUygurIAkıncıoğluG, et al.Experimental study on the performance characteristics of non-asbestos brake pads using a novel friction testing machine. Exp Tech2021; 45: 561–570.
45.
ParkerEGreleB. Friction materials and their manufacture. Patent 4775705, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1988.
RobertoC. Dante handbook of friction materials and their applications. Amsterdam: Woodhead Publishing Limited, Elsevier, 2016.
48.
TsugawaKSuzukiSKubonoH. Friction material. Patent 5712029, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1998.
49.
BoegeholdALShortCR. Friction elemental. Patent 1757408, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1930.
50.
ZhangPZhangLFuK, et al.Effects of different forms of Fe powder additives on the simulated braking performance of Cu-based friction materials for high-speed railway trains. Wear2018; 414–415: 317–326.
51.
MishraPSChandraKLenin SingaraveluD. Iron based/coper based cermet friction materials/composites/brake elements with builtin backing plates.
52.
TsangPHSJackoMGRheeSK. Comparison of chase and inertial brake dynamometer testing of automotive friction materials. Wear1985; 103: 217–232.
53.
SaikrishnanGJayakumariLSVijayR, et al.Influence of iron–aluminum alloy on the tribological performance of non-asbestos brake friction materials – a solution for copper replacement. Ind Lubr Tribol2020; 72: 66–78.
54.
VijayRLenin SingaraveluDFilipP. Influence of molybdenum disulfide particle size on friction and wear characteristics of non-asbestos-based copper-free brake friction composites. Surf Rev Lett; 27. Epub ahead of print 1 January 2020, 2020: 1950085. DOI: 10.1142/S0218625X19500859.
55.
JavaidMHaleemASinghRP, et al.Role of additive manufacturing applications towards environmental sustainability. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res2021; 4: 312–322.
56.
Du PlessisABroeckhovenCYadroitsavaI, et al.Beautiful and functional: a review of biomimetic design in additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf2019; 27: 408–427.
57.
SimondsHR. Source book of the. New plastics. J Franklin Inst1959; 268: 521.
58.
AvalloneEABaumeisterTIII. Marks handbook for mechanical engineers. New York: McGraw Hill, 1997, pp. 6–142.
59.
Chrysotile asbestos. Priority Existing Chemical Report 91999, p.8.
BakloutiMCristolALDesplanquesY, et al.Impact of the glass fibers addition on tribological behavior and braking performances of organic matrix composites for brake lining. Wear2015; 330–331: 507–514.
66.
KimSHJangH. Friction and vibration of brake friction materials reinforced with chopped glass fibers. Tribol Lett2013; 52: 341–349.
67.
GweonJHJooBSJangH. The effect of short glass fiber dispersion on the friction and vibration of brake friction materials. Wear2016; 362–363: 61–67.
68.
SatapathyBKBijweJ. Performance of friction materials based on variation in nature of organic fibres part I. Fade and recovery behaviour. Wear2004; 257: 573–584.
69.
BijweJKumarMGurunathPV, et al.Optimization of brass contents for best combination of tribo-performance and thermal conductivity of non-asbestos organic (NAO) friction composites. Wear2008; 265: 699–712.
70.
AmatoFCasseeFRDenier van der GonHAC, et al.Urban air quality: the challenge of traffic non-exhaust emissions. J Hazard Mater2014; 275: 31–36.
71.
AzizishiraziADewWAForsythHL, et al.Olfactory recovery of wild yellow perch from metal contaminated lakes. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf2013; 88: 42–47.
72.
GargBDCadleSHMulawaPA, et al.Brake wear particulate matter emissions. Environ Sci Technol2000; 34: 4463–4469.
73.
CiudinRVermaPCGialanellaS, et al.Wear debris materials from brake systems: environmental and health issues. WIT Trans Ecol Environ2014; 191: 1423–1434.
74.
HulskotteJHJvan der GonHACDVisschedijkAJH, et al.Brake wear from vehicles as an important source of diffuse copper pollution. Water Sci Technol2007; 56: 223–231.
75.
MahaleVBijweJ. Role of thermal conductivity in controlling the tribo-performance of non-asbestos organic brake-pads. J Compos Mater. Epub ahead of print 2020, 2020; 54: 4145–4155. DOI: 10.1177/0021998320928124.
76.
LibschTARheeSK. Microstructural changes in semimetallic disc brake pads created by low temperature dynamometer testing. Wear1978; 46: 203–212.
77.
ThiyagarajanVKalaichelvanKVijayR, et al.Influence of thermal conductivity and thermal stability on the fade and recovery characteristics of non-asbestos semi-metallic disc brake pad. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2016; 38: 1207–1219.
78.
ManoharanSVijayRLenin SingaraveluD, et al.Investigation on tribological and corrosion characteristics of oxide-coated steel and mild steel fiber-based brake friction composites. Ind Lubr Tribol2019; 71: 341–347.
79.
JungKLeeSWKwonS, et al.Friction and wear properties of high manganese steel in brake friction material for passenger cars. Tribol Lubr2020; 36: 88–95.
80.
WeiLChoyYSCheungCS, et al.Tribology performance, airborne particle emissions and brake squeal noise of copper-free friction materials. Wear2020; 448–449: 203215.
81.
VijayRSingaraveluDLJayaganthanR. Development and characterization of stainless steel fiber-based copper-free brake liner formulation: a positive solution for steel fiber replacement. Friction2020; 8: 396–420.
82.
MahaleVBijweJ. Exploration of plasma treated stainless steel swarf to reduce the wear of copper-free brake-pads. Tribol Int2020; 144: 106111.
83.
GopalPDharaniLRBlumFD. Hybrid phenolic friction composites containing Kevlar® pulp part 1. Enhancement of friction and wear performance. Wear1996; 193: 199–206.
CaiPLiZWangT, et al.Effect of aspect ratios of aramid fiber on mechanical and tribological behaviors of friction materials. Tribol Int2015; 92: 109–116.
86.
KatoTMagarioA. The wear of aramid fiber reinforced brake pads: the role of aramid fibers. Tribol Trans1994; 37: 559–565.
87.
ManoharanSVijayRSingaraveluDL, et al. Tribological characterization of recycled basalt-aramid fiber reinforced hybrid friction composites using grey-based Taguchi approach. Mater Res Express; 6. Epub ahead of print 1 March 2019, 2019: 065301. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab07ce.
88.
ChoMHChoKHKimSJ, et al.The role of transfer layers on friction characteristics in the sliding interface between friction materials against gray iron brake disks. Tribol Lett2005; 20: 101–108.
89.
HoSCLinJHCJuCP. Effect of fiber addition on mechanical and tribological properties of a copper/phenolic-based friction material. Wear2005; 258: 861–869.
AhmadijokaniFShojaeiADordanihaghighiS, et al.Effects of hybrid carbon-aramid fiber on performance of non-asbestos organic brake friction composites. Wear2020; 452–453: 203280.
92.
DuanJZhangMChenP, et al. Tribological behavior and applications of carbon fiber reinforced ceramic composites as high-performance frictional materials. Ceram Int. Epub ahead of print 23 February 2021, 2021; 47: 19271–19281. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.02.187.
93.
HoweJL. Recent work in inorganic chemistry. J Am Chem Soc1909; 31: 1284–1305.
94.
DoxseeLTRobertNJEvansE, et al. Acrytlic containing frction materials. Patent 4866107A, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1988.
95.
PatnaikAKumarMSatapathyBK, et al.Performance sensitivity of hybrid phenolic composites in friction braking: effect of ceramic and aramid fibre combination. Wear2010; 269: 891–899.
96.
CritchleyJPKnightGJWrightWW, et al.Thermosetting polymers. Heat-Resistant Polym1983: 21–85.
97.
KimSJJangH. Friction and wear of friction materials containing two different phenolic resins reinforced with aramid pulp. Tribol Int2000; 33: 477–484.
98.
Surya RajanBSai BalajiMAMohamed Aslam NooraniAB. Tribological performance of graphene/graphite filled phenolic composites - a comparative study. Compos Commun2019; 15: 34–39.
99.
YesnikMA. Friction material comprising powdered phenolic resin and method of making same. Patent 5529666, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1996.
100.
LamportRABiermann-WeaverJMJainVK, et al. Resin mixture for friction materials. Patent 5753018, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1998.
101.
KaneJFMowrerNR. Phenolic resin compositions with improved impact resistance. Patent 5736619, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1998.
102.
YinTFuQZhouL, et al.Superior wear resistance of boron phenolic resin-based composites using fluorine rubber micro powder as high-performance additive. Tribol Int2020; 142: 106001.
103.
KakegawaHYasudaTWangX. Binder composition for friction materials, and friction material. Patent 5889081, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1999.
104.
HaraYOyamaTInoueM, et al. Non-asbestos disc brake pad for automobiles. Patent 6220404, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 2001.
105.
LamRCChenY-F. Carbon deposit friction lining material. Patent 5856244, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1999.
106.
TsangPHCoyleJPLiuT, et al. Method of manufacturing a friction article. Patent 4537823, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1985.
107.
LeeEJHwangHJLeeWG, et al.Morphology and toughness of abrasive particles and their effects on the friction and wear of friction materials: a case study with zircon and quartz. Tribol Lett2010; 37: 637–644.
108.
ChoKHJangHHongYS, et al.The size effect of zircon particles on the friction characteristics of brake lining materials. Wear2008; 264: 291–297.
109.
ParkJSongWGweonJ, et al.Size effect of zircon particles in brake pads on the composition and size distribution of emitted particulate matter. Tribol Int2021; 160: 106995.
110.
BianGWuH. Friction and surface fracture of a silicon carbide ceramic brake disc tested against a steel pad. J Eur Ceram Soc2015; 35: 3797–3807.
111.
Byeong-ChoonGIn-SikC. Microstructural analysis and wear performance of carbon-fiber-reinforced SiC composite for brake pads. Materials (Basel); 10. Epub ahead of print 2017, 2017: 701. DOI: 10.3390/ma10070701.
112.
LuYHLiZZhouW, et al.Manufacture and tribological behavior of C/C-SiC brake composites modified with Fe-Si alloy. J Ceram Sci Technol2017; 8: 213–222.
113.
MatějkaVLuYJiaoL, et al.Effects of silicon carbide particle sizes on friction-wear properties of friction composites designed for car brake lining applications. Tribol Int2010; 43: 144–151.
114.
KirkREOthmerDFMannCA. Encyclopedia of chemical technology. Vol. II. J Phys Chem1949; 53: 591.
115.
SatapathyBKBijweJ. Analysis of simultaneous influence of operating variables on abrasive wear of phenolic composites. Wear2002; 253: 787–794.
116.
CaiPWangYWangT, et al.Improving tribological behaviors of friction material by mullite. Tribol Int2015; 93: 282–288.
117.
Vineeth KumarVSenthil KumaranSDhanalakshmiS, et al.Correction to: tribological performance evaluation of fused mullite-reinforced hybrid composite brake pad for defence application (journal of the Brazilian society of mechanical sciences and engineering, (2019), 41, 4, (179), 10.1007/s40430-019-1682-2). J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2019; 41: 1.
118.
KimSSHwangHJShinMW, et al.Friction and vibration of automotive brake pads containing different abrasive particles. Wear2011; 271: 1194–1202.
SugozuIMutluISugozuKB. The effect of ulexite to the tribological properties of brake lining materials. Polym Compos2018; 39: 55–62.
121.
WangXBaoJLiuJ, et al. Preparation and optimization of a soft magnetic brake friction material based on permalloy additive. Ind Lubr Tribol. Epub ahead of print 2021, 2021; 73: 308–315. DOI: 10.1108/ILT-04-2020-0124.
122.
JeganmohanSSugozuB. Usage of powder pinus brutia cone and colemanite combination in brake friction composites as friction modifier. Mater Today Proc2019; 27: 2072–2075.
123.
AkıncıoğluGÖktemHUygurI, et al.Determination of friction-wear performance and properties of eco-friendly brake pads reinforced with hazelnut shell and boron dusts. Arab J Sci Eng2018; 43: 4727–4737.
124.
BowdenFPGreenwoodJHImaiM. Lubrication at high temperature of refractory solids. Proc R Soc London Ser A1968; 304: 157–169.
125.
ChungJOGoSRKimJH, et al.Effect of MoS2 on transfer film formation and friction coefficients in NAO friction material. Ind Lubr Tribol2019; 71: 221–231.
126.
BodikMSojkovaMHulmanM, et al.Friction control by engineering the crystallographic orientation of the lubricating few-layer MoS2 films. Appl Surf Sci2021; 540: 148328.
127.
ChapteuilERenoufMZengC, et al. Influence of copper/graphite properties on the tribological and electrical behavior of copper-graphite third body layer. Lubricants; 6. Epub ahead of print 2018, 2018: 109. DOI: 10.3390/lubricants6040109.
128.
AranganathanNBijweJKhatriDS. Role of combination of hexagonal boron nitride and graphite in NAO friction material. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol2016; 230: 1107–1112.
129.
FilipPWeissZRafajaD. On friction layer formation in polymer matrix composite materials for brake applications. Wear2002; 252: 189–198.
130.
SathickbashaKSelvakumarASBalajiMAS, et al. The dual role of metal sulfides as lubricant and abrasive: an interface study in friction composite. Mater Res Express; 6. Epub ahead of print 2019, 2019: 045315. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/aafd5a.
LeeWKRheeTHKimHS, et al.Effects of antimony trisulfide (Sb2S3) on sliding friction of automotive brake friction materials. Met Mater Int2013; 19: 1101–1107.
133.
VijayRManoharanSNagarajanS, et al. Influence of premixed dual metal sulfides on the tribological performance of copper-free brake friction materials. Ind Lubr Tribol. Epub ahead of print 2020, 2021; 73: 266–274. DOI: 10.1108/ILT-03-2020-0116.
134.
FedorchenkoIM. Antifriction and friction cermet materials. Powder Metall Met Ceram2002; 41: 489–497.
135.
Justin AntonyrajIVijayRLenin SingaraveluD. Influence of WS2/SnS2 on the tribological performance of copper-free brake pads. Ind Lubr Tribol2019; 71: 398–405.
136.
KellerEC. Friction elements. Patent 3477983, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1969.
137.
ManoharanSSai KrishnanGGanesh BabuL, et al. Synergistic effect of red mud-iron sulfide particles on fade-recovery characteristics of non-asbestos organic brake friction composites. Mater Res Express; 6. Epub ahead of print 7 August 2019, 2019: 105311. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab366f.
138.
VijayRSingaraveluDL. Tribological characterization of different mesh-sized natural barite-based copper-free brake friction composites. Tribol Polym Compos Charact Prop Appl2020; 279–300.
139.
LideDRKehiaianH V. CRC Handbook of thermophysical and thermochemical data. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 1995. p.27. Epub ahead of print 1995.
140.
Vineeth KumarVSenthil KumaranS. Friction material composite: types of brake friction material formulations and effects of various ingredients on brake performance-a review. Mater Res Express; 6. Epub ahead of print 2019, 2019: 082005. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab2404.
141.
KragelskiiI. Friction and wear, butterworths. London: Buttersworths, 1965.
142.
VijayRManoharanSLenin SingaraveluD. Influence of natural barytes purity levels on the tribological characteristics of non-asbestos brake pads. Ind Lubr Tribol2020; 72: 349–358.
143.
Lenin SingaraveluDRahul RaghMVijayR, et al. Development and performance evaluation of eco-friendly crab shell powder based brake pads for automotive applications. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering, 2019; 16: 6502–6523. DOI: 10.15282/ijame.16.2.2019.4.0491.
144.
QiSFuZYunR, et al.Effects of walnut shells on friction and wear performance of eco-friendly brake friction composites. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol2014; 228: 511–520.
145.
BhattacharyaS. Metal-filled polymers: properties and applications. New York: MarcelDekker, 1986.
146.
PaiASubramanianSSoodT. Tribological response of waste tire rubber as micro-fillers in automotive brake lining materials. Friction2020; 8: 1153–1168.
147.
KaufmanERBensonGRShainesA. Friction lining material. Patent 4388423, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1983.
148.
KaufmanERBensonGRShainesA. Process for molding a brake lining friction product. Patent 4432922, (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1984.
149.
YangYLiangLWuH, et al.Effect of zinc powder content on tribological behaviors of brake friction materials. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China (English Ed)2020; 30: 3078–3092.
150.
SinghTPatnaikA. Thermo-mechanical and tribological properties of multi-walled carbon nanotubes filled friction composite materials. Polym Compos2017; 38: 1183–1193.
151.
BlumeWA. Friction element. Patent 1924021, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1933.
152.
JamesDBruceDS. Treated fabric and process of making the same. Patent 2033928, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1936.
153.
LaherFJKelleherCF. Molded brake lining. Patent 2534607, USA (United States Patent and Trademark Office), 1950.
154.
Sudhan RajJChristyTVDarius GnanarajS, et al.Influence of calcium sulfate whiskers on the tribological characteristics of automotive brake friction materials. Eng Sci Technol Int J2020; 23: 445–451.
155.
AmirjanM. Microstructure, wear and friction behavior of nanocomposite materials with natural ingredients. Tribol Int2019; 131: 184–190.
156.
Fono–TamoRSKoyaOA. Evaluation of mechanical properties of friction pad developed from agricultural waste. Int J Adv Res Technol2013; 2: 2278–7763.
157.
JeganmohanSSugozuBKumarM, et al.Experimental investigation on the friction and wear characteristics of palm seed powder reinforced brake pad friction composites. J Inst Eng Ser D2020; 101: 61–69.
158.
LiuYMaYYuJ, et al.Development and characterization of alkali treated abaca fiber reinforced friction composites. Compos Interfaces2019; 26: 67–82.
159.
VinodAVijayRSingaraveluDL, et al.Extraction and characterization of natural fiber from stem of cardiospermum halicababum. J Nat Fibers2019; 00: 1–11.
160.
VijayRManoharanSArjunS, et al. Characterization of silane-treated and untreated natural fibers from stem of Leucas Aspera. J Nat Fibers. Epub ahead of print. 2021; 18: 1957–1973. DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2019.1710651.
161.
KhanAVijayRLenin SingaraveluD, et al.Extraction and characterization of cellulose fibers from the stem of Momordica Charantia. J Nat Fibers2020; 00: 1–11.
162.
SathyamoorthyGVijayRLenin SingaraveluD. Development and characterization of alkali-treated and untreated Dactyloctenium aegyptium fibers based epoxy composites. Mater Today Proc2020; 39: 1215–1220.
163.
ArasSTarakçıoğluN. Optimization and assessment of brake pad production parameters and organic Juniperus drupacea cone powder additive ratio using the Taguchi method. J Compos Mater. Epub ahead of print 25 February 2021, 2021; 55: 2705–2719. DOI: 10.1177/0021998321997532.
164.
Sai KrishnanGGanesh BabuLKumaranP, et al.Investigation of Caryota urens fibers on physical, chemical, mechanical and tribological properties for brake pad applications. Mater Res Express2019; 7: 015310.
165.
KchaouMKusRSingaraveluDL, et al.Design, characterization, and performance analysis of Miscanthus fiber reinforced composite for brake application. J Eng Res2021; 9: 222–234.
166.
AbutuJLawalSANdalimanMB, et al.An overview of brake pad production using non-hazardous reinforcement materials. Acta Tech Corvininesis-Bulletin Eng2018; 11: 143–156.
167.
AkıncıoğluGAkıncıoğluSÖktemH, et al.Evaluation of the physical properties of hazelnut shell dust-added brake pad samples treated with cryogenic process. J Polytech2018; 22: 591–596.
168.
AkıncıoğluGUygurİAkıncıoğluS, et al.Friction-wear performance in environmentally friendly brake composites: a comparison of two different test methods. Polym Compos2021; 42: 4461–4477.
169.
AkıncıoğluGAkıncıoğluSÖktemH, et al.Wear response of non-asbestos brake pad composites reinforced with walnut shell dustJ Aust Ceram Soc2020; 56: 1061–1072.
170.
Surya RajanBSai BalajiMAMohamed Aslam NooraniAB. Effect of silane surface treatment on the physico-mechanical properties of shell powder reinforced epoxy modified phenolic friction composite. Mater Res Express2019; 6: 65315.
171.
SinghTRathiMKPatnaikA, et al.Application of waste tire rubber particles in non-asbestos organic brake friction composite materials. Mater Res Express2019; 6: 35703.
172.
MilenkovićPDJovanovićSJJankovićAS, et al. The influence of brake pads thermal conductivity on passanger car brake system efficiency. Thermal Science, 2010; 14: 221–230.
173.
BelhocineA. Numerical investigation of a three-dimensional disc-pad model with and without thermal effects. Therm Sci2015; 19: 2195–2204.
174.
RivaGVarrialeFWahlströmJ. A finite element analysis (FEA) approach to simulate the coefficient of friction of a brake system starting from material friction characterization. Friction2021; 9: 191–200.
175.
AkıncıoğluGAkıncıoğluSÖktemH, et al. Experimental investigation on the friction characteristics of hazelnut powder reinforced brake pad. Reports Mech Eng2021; 2: 23–30.
176.
KchaouMSellamiAFajouiJ, et al. Tribological performance characterization of brake friction materials: what test? What coefficient of friction?Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol2019; 233: 214–226.
177.
AkincioğluGAkincioğluSÖktemH, et al.Brake pad performance characteristic assessment methods. Int J Automot Sci Technol2021; 5: 67–78.
178.
Justin AntonyrajILenin SingaraveluD. Tribological characterization of various solid lubricants based copper-free brake friction materials-a comprehensive study. Mater Today Proc2019; 27: 2650–2656.
179.
SondhiAImhoffPTDentelSK, et al.Assessment of methods for collecting fallout brake pad wear debris for environmental analysis. J Environ Sci Heal - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Subst Environ Eng2010; 45: 239–249.
180.
KukutschováJRoubíčekVMalachováK, et al.Wear mechanism in automotive brake materials, wear debris and its potential environmental impact. Wear2009; 267: 807–817.
181.
ÖztürkBZtürkSÖAdigüzelAA. Effect of type and relative amount of solid lubricants and abrasives on the tribological properties of brake friction materials. Tribol Trans2013; 56: 428–441.
182.
ÖsterleWUrbanI. Third body formation on brake pads and rotors. Tribol Int2006; 39: 401–408.
183.
ParkJJooBSeoH, et al.Analysis of wear induced particle emissions from brake pads during the worldwide harmonized light vehicles test procedure (WLTP). Wear2021; 466–467: 203539.
RiaTSoibMKasirR. Selection of best formulation for semi-metallic brake friction materials development. In: Kondoh, K (ed) Powder metallurgy. London, UK: IntechOpen, 2012, pp. 1–30.
