The stick–slip phenomena of various types (halloysite, montmorillonite and wollastonite) of clay-based composite friction materials were evaluated in terms of their velocity-dependent friction response. Scanning electron microscopy of the contact patches suggested breakage of contact plateaus in the composites with halloysite, whereas relatively small contact patches were developed in montmorillonite-based friction composites. The presence of relatively harder ingredients such as magnesium oxide and iron particles on the worn surface have contributed to the stick–slip phenomenon. The presence of wollastonite in the composites leads to the ploughing effect during sliding. The intensity of creep groan remained controlled by the shear strength of the interfacial junction involving asperity contact/welding whereas dynamic groan remains predominated by the stiffness of the composites.
QianWJChenGXZhouZR. Dynamic transient analysis of squealing vibration of a reciprocating sliding system. Wear2013; 301: 47–56.
2.
NamJChoiHKangJ. Finite element analysis for friction noise of simplified hip joint and its experimental validation. J Mech Sci Technol2016; 30: 3453–3460.
3.
LiuPZhengHCaiC, et al. Analysis of disc brake squeal using the complex eigenvalue method. Appl Acoust2007; 68: 603–615.
4.
CrowtherAZhangNLiuDK,et al. Analysis and simulation of clutch engagement judder and stick–slip in automotive powertrain systems. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2004; 218: 1427–1446.
5.
GórskiJKlepkaADziedziechK, et al. Identification of the stick and slip motion between contact surfaces using artificial neural networks. Nonlinear Dyn2020; 100: 225–242.
6.
SinouJJ. Transient non-linear dynamic analysis of automotive disc brake squeal – on the need to consider both stability and non-linear analysis. Mech Res Commun2010; 37: 96–105.
7.
RheeSKTsangPHSWangYS. Friction-induced noise and vibration of disc brakes. Wear1989; 133: 39–45.
8.
IbrahimRA. Friction-induced vibration, chatter, squeal, and chaos – part II: dynamics and modeling. Appl Mech Rev1994; 47: 227–253.
9.
ParkCWShinMWJangH. Friction-induced stick–slip intensified by corrosion of gray iron brake disc. Wear2014; 309: 89–95.
10.
JacobssonH. Aspects of disc brake judder. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2003; 217: 419–430.
11.
LeeJ-JLeeJ-AKwonS,et al. Effect of different reinforcement materials on the formation of secondary plateaus and friction properties in friction materials for automobiles. Tribol Int2018; 120: 70–79.
12.
LeeSJangH. Effect of plateau distribution on friction instability of brake friction materials. Wear2018; 400–401: 1–9.
13.
LazimARMKchaouMHamidMKA,et al.Squealing characteristics of worn brake pads due to silica sand embedment into their friction layers. Wear2016; 358–359: 123–136.
14.
SinghTPatnaikASatapathyBK, et al. Effect of nanoclay reinforcement on the friction braking performance of hybrid phenolic friction composites. J Mater Eng Perform2012; 22: 796–805.
15.
SatapathyBKPatnaikADadkarN, et al. Influence of vermiculite on performance of flyash-based fibre-reinforced hybrid composites as friction materials. Mater Des2011; 32: 4354–4361.
16.
AhmadijokaniFShojaeiAArjmandM, et al. Effect of short carbon fiber on thermal, mechanical and tribological behavior of phenolic-based brake friction materials. Compos B, Eng2019; 168: 98–105.
17.
VermaPCAlemaniMGialanellaS, et al. Wear debris from brake system materials: a multi-analytical characterization approach. Tribol Int2016; 94: 249–259.
18.
WahlströmJLyuYMatjekaV,et al. A pin-on-disc tribometer study of disc brake contact pairs with respect to wear and airborne particle emissions. Wear2017; 384–385: 124–130.
19.
LertwassanaWParnklangTMoraP, et al. High performance aramid pulp/carbon fiber-reinforced polybenzoxazine composites as friction materials. Compos B, Eng2019; 177: 107280–107290.
20.
KřístkováMWeissZFilipP. Hydration properties of vermiculite in phenolic resin friction composites. Appl Clay Sci2004; 25: 229–236.
21.
ChangLZhangZYeL,et al. Synergistic effects of nanoparticles and traditional tribofillers on sliding wear of polymeric hybrid composites. Tribol Polym Nanocompos2013: 49–89.
22.
KasyapSSSenetakisK. A micromechanical experimental study of kaolinite-coated sand grains. Tribol Int2018; 126: 206–217.
23.
CheQZhangGZhangL, et al. Switching brake materials to extremely wear-resistant self-lubrication materials via tuning interface nanostructures. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2018; 10: 19173–19181.
24.
HeQLiAWangZ, et al. Tribological behavior of ZnO-Si3N4 nanoparticles-based lubricating grease. J Exp Nanosci2018; 13: 231–244.
25.
DongCYuanCWangL, et al. Tribological properties of water-lubricated rubber materials after modification by MoS2 nanoparticles. Sci Rep2016; 6: 35023.
26.
GondaneSSinghAKVijayakumarRP,et al. The effect of carbon nanotubes based nanolubricant on stick–slip behavior. Trans Indian Inst Met2017; 71: 1061–1065.
27.
SahaDSatapathyBK. Friction hysteresis and subsequent wear mechanism of clay-based phenolic composites under cyclic load. Mater Today, Proc2019; 19: 196–204.
28.
MendeloviciEVillalbaRSagarzazuA. Selective destruction and differentiation of clay minerals from natural diaspore admixture by mortar grinding. Int J Miner Process1983; 11: 131–138.
29.
ShepelevOKenigSDodiukH. 16 – nanotechnology based thermosets. In: DodiukHGoodmanSH (eds) Handbook of thermoset plastics. 3rd ed. Boston: William Andrew Publishing, 2014, pp. 623–695.
KimJWJooBSJangH. The effect of contact area on velocity weakening of the friction coefficient and friction instability: a case study on brake friction materials. Tribol Int2019; 135: 38–45.
32.
JaggiHSSatapathyBKPatnaikA, et al. Temperature dependence of friction and wear performance and thermomechanical response of flyash-filled brake composites. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2012; 227: 373–384.
33.
HwangHJJungSLChoKH, et al. Tribological performance of brake friction materials containing carbon nanotubes. Wear2010; 268: 519–525.
34.
JaggiHSTiwariASatapathyBK,et al. Dynamic mechanical response and fade–recovery performance of friction composites: effect of flyash and resin combination. J Reinf Plast Compos2013; 32: 835–845.
35.
TiwariAJaggiHSKachhapRK, et al. Comparative performance assessment of cenosphere and barium sulphate based friction composites. Wear2014; 309: 259–268.
36.
ShinMWKimJWJooBS,et al. Wear and friction-induced vibration of brake friction materials with different weight average molar mass phenolic resins. Tribol Lett2015; 58: 1–10.
37.
BazrafshanMde RooijMBSchipperDJ. On the role of adhesion and roughness in stick–slip transition at the contact of two bodies: a numerical study. Tribol Int2018; 121: 381–388.
38.
BraunOMBarelIUrbakhM. Dynamics of transition from static to kinetic friction. Phys Rev Lett2009; 103: 194301.
39.
TrømborgJScheibertJAmundsenDS, et al. Transition from static to kinetic friction: insights from a 2D model. Phys Rev Lett2011; 107: 074301.
40.
ChuZZhengFLiangL, et al. Parameter determination of a minimal model for brake squeal. Appl Sci2018; 8: 1–15.
41.
GaoCKuhlmann-WilsdorfDMakelDD. Fundamentals of stick–slip. Wear1993; 162–164: 1139–1149.
42.
KimSHJangH. Friction and vibration of brake friction materials reinforced with chopped glass fibers. Tribol Lett2013; 52: 341–349.
43.
YoonSWShinMWLeeWG,et al. Effect of surface contact conditions on the stick–slip behavior of brake friction material. Wear2012; 294–295: 305–312.
44.
KachhapRKSatapathyBK. Synergistic effect of tungsten disulfide and cenosphere combination on braking performance of composite friction materials. Mater Des (1980–2015)2014; 56: 368–378.
45.
KimSSHwangHJShinMW,et al. Friction and vibration of automotive brake pads containing different abrasive particles. Wear2011; 271: 1194–1202.
46.
OstermeyerGP. On the dynamics of the friction coefficient. Wear2003; 254: 852–858.
47.
RabinowiczE. The intrinsic variables affecting the stick–slip process. Proc Phys Soc1958; 71: 668–675.
ChangLZhangZYeL,et al. Chapter 3 – Synergistic effects of nanoparticles and traditional tribo-fillers on sliding wear of polymeric hybrid composites. In: FriedrichKSchlarbAK (eds) Tribol and Interface Engineering Series. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2008, pp. 35–61.
50.
GhazalyNMEl-SharkawyMAhmedI. A review of automotive brake squeal mechanisms. J Mech Des Vibr2014; 1: 5–9.
51.
Juel ThomsenJFidlinA. Analytical approximations for stick–slip vibration amplitudes. Int J Non-Linear Mech2003; 38: 389–403.
52.
NakanoKMaegawaS. Stick–slip in sliding systems with tangential contact compliance. Tribol Int2009; 42: 1771–1780.
53.
GraefJR. On the generalized Liénard equation with negative damping. J Differ Equ1972; 12: 34–62.
54.
Az-Zo’biEAAl-KhaledKDarweeshA. Numeric-analytic solutions for nonlinear oscillators via the modified multi-stage decomposition method. Mathematics2019; 7: 1–13.
55.
TangLZhuXQianX,et al. Effects of weight on bit on torsional stick–slip vibration of oilwell drill string. J Mech Sci Technol2017; 31: 4589–4597.
56.
DayA. Chapter 10 – brake noise and judder. In: DayA (ed) Braking of road vehicles. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2014, pp. 343–384.
57.
RabinowiczE. Stick and slip. Sci Am1956; 194: 109–119.
58.
BowdenFPTaborD. The friction and lubrication of solids. Am J Phys1951; 19: 428–429.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
