In this paper, we have studied the effect of the degree of asymmetry and peakedness on the performances of a rough contact. A numerical model is proposed to evaluate the real area, the number of contacting asperities and the normal stiffness. The contact between two rough surfaces was modeled as a contact between a rigid flat and an elastic–plastic rough surface taking into account the work hardening and interaction among asperities. The Pearson system of frequency curves was used to generate non-Gaussian random surfaces. Results show that a negative skewness and/or a low kurtosis improve the contact performances by increasing the normal stiffness. This increase is governed by much more asperities into contact and more elastic behavior.
GreenwooldJAWilliamsonJBP. contact of normally flat surfaces. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A1966; 295: 300–318.
2.
Sherif HanyAKossaSS. Relationship between normal and tangential contact stiffness of nominally flat surfaces. Wear1991; 151: 49–62.
3.
EtsionIKligermanYKadinY. Unloading of an elastic-plastic loaded spherical contact. Int J Solids Struct2005; 42: 3716–3729.
4.
GaoYFBowerAFKimK-S, et al.The behavior of an elastic–perfectly plastic sinusoidal surface under contact loading. Wear2006; 261: 145–154.
5.
PeiLHyunSMolinariJF, et al.Finite element modeling of elasto-plastic contact between rough surfaces. J Mech Phys Solids2005; 53: 2385–2409.
6.
HyunSPelLMolinariJF, et al.Finite-element analysis of contact between elastic self-affine surfaces. Phys Rev E2004; 70: 1–12.
7.
ZhaoBZhangSWangP, et al.Loading–unloading normal stiffness model for power-law hardening surfaces considering actual surface topography. Tribol Int2015; 90: 332–342.
8.
SepehriAFarhangK. On elastic interaction of nominally flat rough surfaces. J Tribol2008; 130: 1–5.
9.
KrólikowskiJSzczepekJ. Prediction of contact parameters using ultrasonic method. Wear1991; 148: 181–195.
10.
StarzynskiGBuczkowskiR. Ultrasonic measurements of contact stiffness between rough surfaces. J Tribol2014; 136: 034503–034503.
11.
DuFHongJXuY. An acoustic model for stiffness measurement of tribological interface using ultrasound. Tribol Int2014; 73: 70–77.
12.
DrinkwaterBWDwyer-JoyceRSCawleyP. A study of the interaction between ultrasound and a partially contacting solid-solid interface. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci1996; 452: 2613–2628.
13.
KartalMEMulvihillDMNowellD, et al.Measurements of pressure and area dependent tangential contact stiffness between rough surfaces using digital image correlation. Tribol Int2011; 44: 1188–1198.
14.
MulvihillDMBrunskillHKartalME, et al.A comparison of contact stiffness measurements obtained by the digital image correlation and ultrasound techniques. Exp Mech2013; 53: 1245–1263.
15.
Hanaor DorianAHGanYEinavI. Contact mechanics of fractal surfaces by spline assisted discretisation. Int J Solids Struct2015; 59: 121–131.
16.
LiuPZhaoHHuangK, et al.Research on normal contact stiffness of rough surface considering friction based on fractal theory. Appl Surf Sci2015; 349: 43–48.
17.
ZhaoYXuJCaiL, et al.Stiffness and damping model of bolted joint based on the modified three-dimensional fractal topography. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2017; 231: 279–293–279–293.
18.
WangRZhuLZhuC. Research on fractal model of normal contact stiffness for mechanical joint considering asperity interaction. Int J Mech Sci2017; 134: 357–369.
19.
BelhadjAmorMBelghithSMezliniS. Finite element modeling of RMS roughness effect on the contact stiffness of rough surfaces. Tribol Ind2016; 38: 392–401–392–401.
20.
ZhanWHuangP. Modeling tangential contact based on non-Gaussian rough surfaces. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2019; 233: 51–60.
21.
MedinaSOlver AndrewVDiniD. The influence of surface topography on energy dissipation and compliance in tangentially loaded elastic contacts. J Tribol2012; 134: 011401–011401.
22.
EldertonWPJohnsonNL. System of frequency curves, London, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
23.
WestergaardHM. Bearing pressures and cracks. J Appl Mech1939; 61: A49–53.
24.
BelghithSMezliniSBelhadjsalahH, et al.Thermo-mechanical modelling of the contact between rough surfaces using homogenisation technique. Mech Res Commun2013; 53: 57–62.
25.
LyashenkoIAPastewkaLPersson BoNJ. On the validity of the method of reduction of dimensionality: area of contact, average interfacial separation and contact stiffness. Tribol Lett2013; 52: 223–229.
26.
ZhangSWangWZhaoZ. The effect of surface roughness characteristics on the elastic-plastic contact performance. Tribol Int2014; 79: 59–73.
27.
SevostianovIKachanovM. Contact of rough surfaces: a simple model for elasticity, conductivity and cross-property connections. J Mech Phys Solids2008; 56: 1380–1400.
