The wear property of high-vanadium alloy steel was studied using a dry sand/rubber wheel testing apparatus and the microstructures and failure behaviors were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy, using commercial Cr16 as a reference material. The wear resistance of high-vanadium alloy steel (50 HRC) and high-vanadium alloy steel (65 HRC) was about 3 and 15 times higher, respectively, than that of Cr16. The macroscopic photographs of high-vanadium alloy steel show differences from images of Cr16 and other materials in four different zones on the observed wear scar. Due to the presence of the skeleton structure of the MC carbides, the serious wear zone showed evidence typical of particle rolling, with significant indentations on the surface and little directionality.
GaoHQuLG. 3D design and analysis of the crushing roller of a high-pressure grinding roller. J Mater Process Technol2002; 129: 649–652.
2.
NorgateTEWellerKR. Selection and operation of high pressure grinding rolls circuits for minimum energy consumption. Miner Eng1994; 7: 1253–1267.
3.
AydoğanNAErgünLBenzerH. High pressure grinding rolls (HPGR) applications in the cement industry. Miner Eng2006; 19: 130–139.
4.
SesemannYBroeckmannCHöfterA. A new laboratory test for the estimation of wear in high pressure grinding rolls. Wear2013; 302: 1088–1097.
5.
LimWILWellerKR. Some benefits of using studded surfaces in high pressure grinding rolls. Miner Eng1999; 12: 187–203.
6.
LiHZTongWPCuiJJ, et al.Heat treatment of centrifugally cast High-vanadium alloy steel for high-pressure grinding roller. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett)2014; 27: 430–435.
7.
XuLJXingJDWeiSZ, et al.Investigation on wear behaviors of high-vanadium high-speed steel compared with high-chromium cast iron under rolling contact condition. Mater Sci Eng A2006; 434: 63–70.
8.
XuLJXingJDWeiSZ, et al.Optimisation of chemical composition of high speed steel with high vanadium content for abrasive wear using an artificial neural network. Mater Des2007; 28: 1031–1037.
9.
AxénNJacobsonSHogmarkS. Influence of hardness of the counterbody in three-body abrasive wear - an overlooked hardness effect. Tribol Int1994; 27: 233–241.
10.
KamdiZShipwayPHVoiseyKT, et al.Abrasive wear behaviour of conventional and large-particle tungsten carbide-based cermet coatings as a function of abrasive size and type. Wear2011; 271: 1264–1272.
11.
SureshaBChandramohanGSiddaramaiah, et al.Three-body abrasive wear behaviour of carbon and glass fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Mater Sci Eng A2007; 443: 285–291.
12.
NahviSMShipwayPHMcCartneyDG. Particle motion and modes of wear in the dry sand-rubber wheel abrasion test. Wear2009; 267: 2083–2091.
13.
VargaMRojaczHWinkelmannH, et al.Wear reducing effects and temperature dependence of tribolayer formation in harsh environment. Tribol Int2013; 65: 190–199.
14.
PoomalaiPSiddaramaiahBSureshaB, et al.Mechanical and three-body abrasive wear behaviour of PMMA/TPU blends. Mater Sci Eng A2008; 492: 486–490.
15.
SureshaBChandramohanGSiddaramaiahB, et al.Mechanical and three-body abrasive wear behaviour of three-dimensional glass fabric reinforced vinyl ester composite. Mater Sci Eng A2008; 480: 573–579.
16.
ASTM G65-04. Standard test method for measuring abrasion using the dry sand/rubber wheel apparatus. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2010.
17.
StevensonANJHutchingsIM. Development of the dry sand/rubber wheel abrasion test. Wear1996; 195: 232–240.
18.
WirojanupatumpSShipwayPH. Abrasion of mild steel in wet and dry conditions with the rubber and steel wheel abrasion apparatus. Wear2000; 239: 91–101.
19.
HawkJAWilsonRDTylczakJH, et al.Laboratory abrasive wear tests: investigation of test methods and alloy correlation. Wear1999; 229: 1031–1042.
20.
TylczakJHHawkJAWilsonRD. A comparison of laboratory abrasion and field wear results. Wear1999; 229: 1059–1069.
21.
KlimpelADobrzańskiLALisieckiA, et al.The study of properties of Ni-W2C and Co-W2C powders thermal sprayed deposits. J Mater Process Technol2005; 164–165: 1068–1073.
22.
MelendezNMNarulkarVVFisherGA, et al.Effect of reinforcing particles on the wear rate of low-pressure cold-sprayed WC-based MMC coatings. Wear2013; 306: 185–195.
23.
HyttelMWOlssonDDReiselG, et al.Comparison of a newly developed compression-twist abrasive wear test with the ASTM G65 test method. Wear2013; 307: 134–141.
24.
HwangKCLeeSLeeHC. Effects of alloying elements on microstructure and fracture properties of cast high speed steel rolls, part I: microstructural analysis. Mater Sci Eng A1998; 254: 282–295.
25.
ZhangGQYuanHJiaoDL, et al.Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of T15 high speed steel prepared by twin-atomiser spray forming and thermo-mechanical processing. Mater Sci Eng A2012; 558: 566–571.
26.
JiYPWuSJXuLJ, et al.Effect of carbon contents on dry sliding wear behavior of high vanadium high speed steel. Wear2012; 294–295: 239–245.
27.
HirotaKMitaniKYoshinakaM, et al.Simultaneous synthesis and consolidation of chromium carbides (Cr3C2, Cr7C3 and Cr23C6) by pulsed electric-current pressure sintering. Mater Sci Eng A2005; 399: 154–160.
28.
AntonovMHussainovaIVeinthalR, et al.Effect of temperature and load on three-body abrasion of cermets and steel. Tribol Int2012; 46: 261–268.
29.
CorreaEOAlcântaraNGValerianoLC, et al.The effect of microstructure on abrasive wear of a Fe-Cr-C-Nb hardfacing alloy deposited by the open arc welding process. Surf Coat Technol2015; 276: 479–484.
30.
DubeNBHutchingsIM. Influence of particle fracture in the high-stress and low-stress abrasive wear of steel. Wear1999; 233–235: 246–256.
31.
NahviSMShipwayPHMcCartneyDG. Effects of particle crushing in abrasion testing of steels with ash from biomass-fired powerplants. Wear2009; 267: 34–42.
