Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper presents a statistical method for characterizing the interface stresses between an elastic rough ball and a smooth rigid disc under lubrication by considering the percolation effect of lubricant flow. The statistical analysis was carried out to integrate the random, microscopic asperity deformation with the asperity–lubricant interaction. An efficient solution process with the aid of the fast Fourier transform was developed for the multi-scale analysis. To avoid numerical instability, the Poiseuille term of the average Reynolds equation was turned off when the average lubricant film thickness was below the percolation threshold and the average hydrodynamic pressure was solved by using the Couette term. This successfully overcomes the limitation in the conventional statistical treatment of mixed lubrication. Moreover, it enables a smooth transition from mixed to boundary lubrication and allows a large range of dimensionless rolling speed, which cannot be achieved by conventional approaches. Also, an empirical formula was developed to evaluate the average central and minimum film thicknesses between lubricated rough surfaces in contact. It was found that the method developed can precisely predict the effect of surface roughness on contact stresses, can effectively estimate the contribution of the direct asperity–disc contacts, and can be used to describe the lubricant performance at a rolling–sliding contact interface.

Keywords

Statistical analysis mixed lubrication elastohydrodynamic lubrication rough surface

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Greenwood

Williamson

. Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc Royal Soc Lond Ser A-Math Phys Sci 1966; 295: 300–319.

Greenwood

Tripp

. The contact of two nominally flat rough surfaces. Proc Inst Mech Eng 1970; 185: 625–633.

Bush

Gibson

Thomas

. The elastic contact of rough surfaces. Wear 1975; 35: 87–111.

Chang

Etsion

Bogy

. An elastic–plastic model for thecontact of rough surfaces. J Tribol ASME 1987; 109: 257–263.

Kogut

Etsion

. Elastic-plastic contact analysis of a sphere and a rigid flat. J Appl Mech 2002; 69: 657–662.

Jackson

Green

. A finite element study of elasto-plastic hemispherical contact against a rigid flat. J Tribol 2005; 127: 343–354.

Jackson

Green

. A statistical model of elasto-plastic asperity contact between rough surfaces. Tribol Int 2006; 39: 906–914.

Christensen

. Stochastic models for hydrodynamic lubrication of rough surfaces. Proc Inst Mech Eng 1969; 184: 1013–1026.

Patir

Cheng

. An average flow model for determining effects of three-dimensional roughness on partial hydrodynamic lubrication. J Lubricat Technol ASME 1978; 100: 12–17.

10.

Patir

Cheng

. Application of average flow model to lubrication between rough sliding surfaces. J Lubricat Technol ASME 1979; 101: 220–230.

11.

Tripp

. Surface roughness effects in hydrodynamic lubrication-the flow factor method. J Lubricat Technol ASME 1983; 105: 458–465.

12.

. A study on flow pehnomena in mixed lubrication regimge by porous media model. J Lubricat Technol ASME 1994; 116: 640–647.

13.

Wilson

WRD

Chang

. Low speed mixed lubrication of bulk metal forming processes. J Tribol ASME 1996; 118: 83–89.

14.

Wilson

WRD

Marsault

. Partial hydrodynamic lubrication with large fractional contact areas. J Tribol ASME 1998; 120: 16–20.

15.

Greenwood

Tripp

. The elastic contact of rough spheres. J Appl Mech ASME 1967; 34: 153–159.

16.

Gelinck

ERM

Schipper

. Deformation of rough line contacts. J Tribol ASME 1999; 121: 449–454.

17.

Gelinck

ERM

Schipper

. Calculation of Stribeck curves for line contacts. Tribol Int 2000; 33: 175–181.

18.

Beheshti

Khonsari

. Asperity micro-contact models as applied to the deformation of rough line contact. Tribol Int 2012; 52: 61–74.

19.

Beheshti

Khonsari

. On the contact of curved rough surfaces: contact behavior and predictive formulas. J Appl Mech ASME 2014; 81: 111004–111004.

20.

Zhu

Cheng

. Effect of surface roughness on the point contact EHL. J Lubricat Technol ASME 1988; 110: 32–37.

21.

Johnson

Greenwood

Poon

. A simple theory of asperity contact in elastohydro-dynamic lubrication. Wear 1972; 19: 91–108.

22.

Khonsari

Gelinck

. The Stribeck curve: experimental results and theoretical prediction. J Tribol 2006; 128: 789–794.

23.

Sojoudi

Khonsari

. On the modeling of quasi-steady and unsteady dynamic friction in sliding lubricated line contact. J Tribol 2010; 132: 012101–012101.

24.

Masjedi

Khonsari

. On the effect of surface roughness in point-contact EHL: formulas for film thickness and asperity load. Tribol Int 2015; 82: 228–244.

25.

Liu

Gangopadhyay

. Friction reduction in lubricated rough contacts: numerical and experimental studies. J Tribol 2016; 138: 021506: 1–12.

26.

Jackson

Green

. The behavior of thrust washer bearings considering mixed lubrication and asperity contact. Tribol Transact 2006; 49: 233–247.

27.

Jackson

Green

. The thermoelastic behavior of thrust washer bearings considering mixed lubrication, asperity contact, and thermoviscous effects. Tribol Transact 2008; 51: 19–32.

28.

Hua

Qiu

Cheng

. Modeling of lubrication in micro contact. Tribol Lett 1997; 3: 81–86.

29.

Jiang

Hua

Cheng

et al.

A mixed elastohydrodynamic lubrication model with asperity contact. J Tribol ASME 1999; 121: 481–491.

30.

Zhu

. A full numerical solution to the mixed lubrication in point contacts. J Tribol ASME 2000; 122: 1–9.

31.

Ren

Zhu

Chen

et al.

A three-dimensional deterministic model for rough surface line-contact EHL problems. J Tribol ASME 2009; 131: 1–9.

32.

Zhang

et al.

A novel multi-scale statistical characterisation of interface pressure and friction in metal strip rolling. Int J Mech Sci 2014; 89: 391–402.

33.

Zhang

et al.

A unified method for characterizing multiple lubrication regimes involving plastic deformation of surface asperities. Tribol Int 2016; 100: 70–83.

34.

Stanley

Kato

. An FFT-based method for rough surface contact. J Tribol 1997; 119: 481–485.

35.

Liu

Wang

Liu

. A versatile method of discrete convolution and FFT (DC-FFT) for contact analyses. Wear 2000; 243: 101–111.

36.

McCool

. Comparison of models for the contact of rough surfaces. Wear 1986; 107: 37–60.

37.

Yang

Wen

. A generalized Reynolds equation for non-Newtonian thermal elastohydrodynamic lubrication. J Tribol ASME 1990; 112: 631–636.

38.

Sheu

Wilson

WRD

. Mixed lubrication of strip rolling. STLE Tribol Transact 1994; 37: 483–493.

39.

Chang

Marsault

Wilson

WRD

. Lubrication of strip rolling in the low-speed mixed regime. Tribol Transact 1996; 39: 407–415.

40.

Lin

H-S

Marsault

Wilson

WRD

. A mixed lubrication model for cold strip rolling—Part I: Theoretical. Tribol Transact 1998; 41: 317–326.

41.

Hamrock

Dowson

. Isothermal elastohydrodynamic lubrication of point contacts: Part 1—Theoretical formulation. J Tribol 1976; 98: 223–228.

42.

Greenwood

. Formulas for moderately elliptical Hertzian contacts. J Tribol ASME 1985; 107: 501–504.

43.

Brewe

Hamrock

. Simplified solution for elliptical-contact deformation between two elastic solids. J Tribol 1977; 99: 485–487.

44.

Johnson

. Contact mechanics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

45.

Hamrock

Dowson

. Isothermal elastohydrodynamic lubrication of point contacts: Part III—Fully flooded results. J Tribol 1977; 99: 264–275.

Characterization of interface stresses and lubrication of rough elastic surfaces under ball-on-disc rolling

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References