The article contains mathematical models of Reynolds equation with the effects of hydrophobicity of surface and magnetic field. The first section provides a new mathematical model of the solution of the generalized Reynolds equation and its application for a hydrophilic surface. It also derives a new boundary condition for the contact of a flowing liquid with a hydrophobic surface. This wettability condition is defined in dependence on the adhesion coefficient k. The second part presents mathematical models of Reynolds equation including the effect of hydrophobia and magnetic field. For all problems, the solutions are shown and the definitions of the stiffness and damping matrices of the liquid layer are outlined. From the results, it can be deduced that hydrophobic surface significantly affects the velocity profile of the liquid. It leads to a higher effect of the Lorentz force and thus of the magnetic field in comparison with a hydrophilic surface of the bearing lining.
HarnoyA. Bearing design in machinery, New York: Engineering Tribology and Lubrication, 2003, pp. 628–628.
2.
MetlinVB. BertinovAI. Magnetic and magneto-hydrodynamic bearings, Moscow: Energiya, 1968.
3.
Chiba A, Fukao T, Ichikawa O, et al. Magnetic bearing and bearingless drives. Oxford, UK: Elsevier LTD, 2005. ISBN: 978-0-7506-5727-3.
4.
Žuraviev JN. Active magnetic bearings (Aktivnye magnitnye podšipniki – Teoria rasčetprimenenie). Russia: SP6.: Politechnika, 206s, 2003. ISBN 5-7325-0655-1.
Odenbach S. Magnetoviscous effects in ferrofluids. Springer Lecture Notes in Physics m71 151, 2002.
7.
Odenbach S, ed. Ferrofluids – magnetically controllable fluids and their applications. Springer Lecture Notes in Physics 594, 2002.
8.
RadionovAVVinogradovAN. Magnetic fluid dampers of the bearing nods of the blower (Magnitožidkostnye germetizatory podšipnikovych uzlov reduktorov privoda ventilatorov gradiren NEMA), Sumy: Vibronadežnosť i germetičnosť centroběžnych mašin. Monography, 2011.
9.
GrunceliBRKSandhamNDMcHaleG. Simulation of laminar flow past a superhydrophobic sqhere with drag reduction and separation delay. Phys Fluids2013; 25: 043601–043601.
10.
DaliriMJalali-VahidDRahnejatH. Magneto-hydrodynamics of couple stress lubricants in combined squeeze and shear in parallel annular disc viscous coupling systems. J Eng Tribol2015; 229: 578–596.
11.
TechetAHTruscottTT. Water entry of spinning hydrophobic and hydrophilic spheres. J Fluids Struct2011; 27: 716–726.
12.
Vinogradova OlgaI. Slippage of water over hydrophobic surfaces. Int J Mineral Process1999; 56: 31–60.
13.
MinTKimJ. Effects of hydrophobic surface on stability and transition. Phys Fluids2005; 17: 108106–108106.
14.
JašíkováDKotekMKopeckýV. The study of super hydrophobic surfaces using high speed shadowgraphy. World Acad Sci Eng Technol Int J Chem Mol Nucl Mater Metal Eng2013; 7: 468–473.
15.
Navier CLMH. Memoire Surles du Movement des. Mem Acad Sci Inst France 1823; 1: 414–416.
16.
FialováSPochylýF. Identification and experimental verification of the adhesive coefficient of hydrophobic materials. Wasserwirtschaft Extra2015; 1: 125–129.
17.
PochylýFFialováSKozubkováM. Study of the adhesive coefficient effect on the hydraulic losses and cavitation. Int J Fluid Mach Syst2010; 3: 386–394.
18.
OuJPerotBPothsteinJ. Laminar drag reduction in microchannels using ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Phys Fluids2004; 16: 4635–4635.
19.
DanielloRJWaterhouseNERothsteinJP. Drag reduction in turbulent flows over superhydrophobic surfaces. Phys Fluids2009; 21: 085103–085103.
20.
VolkovAVParyginAGLukinMV. Analysis of the effect of hydrophobic properties of surfaces in the flow part of centrifugal pumps on their operational performance. Therm Eng2015; 62: 817–824.
21.
AkcabayDTYoungYL. Influence of cavitation on the hydroelastic stability of hydrofoils. J Fluids Struct2014; 49: 170–185.
22.
JahanmirSHunsbergerAZHeshmatH. Load capacity and durability of H-DLG coated hydrodynamics thrust bearings. J Tribol2011; 133: 031301–1.
23.
ZhangZSYangYMDaiXD. Effects of thermal boundary conditions on plain journal bearing thermodynamic lubrication. Tribol Trans2013; 56: 759–770.
24.
RaoTVVLNRaniAMANagarajanT. Analysis of journal bearing with double-layer porous lubricant film: influence of surface porous layer configuration. Tribol Trans2013; 56: 841–847.
25.
ChangLYanY. A theory of the hydrodynamic film thickness in centrally pivoted oil-lubricated plane-pad thrust bearings. Tribol Trans2013; 56: 149–160.
26.
OmastaMKřupkaIHartlM. Effect of surface velocity directions on elastohydrodynamic film shape. Tribol Trans2013; 56: 301–309.
27.
MihailidisAAgouridasKPanagiotidisK. Non-Newtonian starved thermal-elastohydrodynamic lubrication of finite line contacts. Tribol Trans2013; 56: 88–100.
28.
Pochylý F, Fialová S, and Kozubková M. Journal bearings with hydrophobic surface. In: Vibronadežnosť i germetičnosť centrobežnyh mašin. Technical study – monography. Sumy, Ukraine, 2011, pp.314–320. ISBN 978-966-657-383-7.
29.
ChernetsMChernetsJ. Generalized method for calculating the durability of sliding bearings with technological out-of-roundness of details. J Eng Tribol2015; 229: 216–226.
30.
PochylýFFialováSMalenovskýE. Bearing with magnetic fluid and hydrophobic surface of the lining. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2012; 15: 1–9. ISSN 1755-1315.
31.
Pochylý F, Fialová S, Habán V, et al. Practical usage of the wettability (Praktičeskoje ispolzovanie smačivajemavosti). PCVEXPO 2008, 2008. ISBN 978-5-7038-3214-1.
32.
Fialová S. Identification of the properties of hydrophobic layers and its usage in technical practice, short version of habilitation thesis. VUTIUM Brno 2016. ISBN 978-80-214-5330-2.
