The objective of this study is to investigate the adhesion characteristics of wheel/rail under oil contamination with consideration of surface roughness using a three-dimensional model of wheel/rail in rolling contact. A partial elastohydrodynamic lubrication theory is employed in the model. An under-relaxation revision on the film thickness is used to keep the simulation procedure stable. The dependence of the wheel/rail adhesion coefficient on train speed, surface roughness amplitude, parameter of roughness orientation and axle load is studied under oil contamination. Moreover, the numerical solutions of a two-dimensional model are compared with those of the three-dimensional model. In addition, a good agreement has been found between the numerical results and the experimental results obtained by a JD-1 wheel/rail simulation facility, which consists of a small wheel roller serving as locomotive or rolling stock wheel and a large wheel roller serving as rail.
Arias-CuevasOLiZLewisR. Rolling–sliding laboratory tests of friction modifiers in dry and wet wheel–rail contacts. Wear2010; 268: 543–551.
2.
OhyamaTOhnoKNakanoS. Influence of surface contamination on adhesion force between wheel and rail at high speeds-behavior of adhesion force under the surface contaminated with a small amount of liquid paraffin. J Jpn Soc Lubr Eng1989; 10: 111–114.
3.
Arias-CuevasOLiZLewisR. Laboratory investigation of some sanding parameters to improve the adhesion in leaf-contaminated wheel–rail contacts. Proc IMechE Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2010; 224: 139–157.
4.
Ohyama T and Maruyama H. Traction and slip at high rolling speeds-some experiments under dry friction and water lubrication. In: Proceedings of international symposium on contact mechanics and wear of rail/wheel systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6–9 July 1982. Waterloo, ON: University of Waterloo Press, pp. 395–418.
5.
OhyamaT. Influence of surface contamination on adhesion force between wheel and rail at high speeds-effects of friction coefficients and tangential rigidity on adhesion force. J Jpn Soc Lubr Eng1989; 10: 115–120.
6.
OhyamaTNakanoS. Influence of surface contamination on adhesion force between wheel and rail at high speeds-behavior of adhesion force under the formation of lubricant film. J Jpn Soc Lubr Eng1989; 10: 121–124.
7.
ChenHBanTIshidaM. Experimental investigation of influential factors on adhesion between wheel and rail under wet conditions. Wear2008; 265: 1504–1511.
8.
WangWJZhangHFWangHY. Study on the adhesion behavior of wheel/rail under oil, water and sanding conditions. Wear2011; 271: 2693–2698.
9.
LewisRDwyer-JoyceRSLewisJ. Disc machine study of contact isolation during railway track sanding. Proc IMechE Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2003; 217: 11–24.
10.
LewisRGallardo-HernandezEAHiltonT. Effect of oil and water mixtures on adhesion in the wheel/rail contact. Proc IMechE Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2003; 217: 275–281.
11.
LiZArias-CuevasOLewisR. Rolling–sliding laboratory tests of friction modifiers in leaf contaminated wheel–rail contacts. Tribol Lett2009; 33: 97–109.
12.
ZhangWChenJWuX. Wheel/rail adhesion and analysis by using full scale roller rig. Wear2002; 253: 82–88.
13.
ChenHBanTIshidaM. Adhesion between rail/wheel under water lubricated contact. Wear2002; 253: 75–81.
14.
ChenHIshidaMNakaharaT. Analysis of adhesion under wet conditions for three-dimensional contact considering surface roughness. Wear2005; 258: 1209–1216.
15.
TombergerCDietmaierPSextroW. Friction in wheel-rail contact: a model comprising interfacial fluids, surface roughness and temperature. Wear2011; 271: 2–12.
16.
ZhuDChengHS. Effect of surface roughness on the point contact EHL. J Tribol1988; 110: 32–37.
17.
PatirNChengHS. Application of average flow model to lubrication between rough sliding surfaces. Trans ASME J Lubr Technol1979; 101: 220–230.
18.
YangY-RZhangJ-YZhaoH. Effects of water medium on adhesion of wheel and rail. J China Railway Soc2002; 22: 31–33.
19.
RoelandsCJA. Correlational aspects of the viscosity-temperature-pressure relationship of lubricating oils, URB Groningen, The Netherlands: Druk, 1966.
20.
GreenwoodJATrippJH. The contact of two nominally flat rough surfaces. Proc Inst Mech Engrs1971; 185: 625–633.
21.
ChenHIshidaMNamuraA. Estimation of wheel/rail adhesion coefficient under wet condition with measured boundary friction coefficient and real contact area. Wear2011; 271: 32–39.
22.
Venner CH. Multilevel solution of the EHL line and point contact problems. PhD Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 1991.
23.
BrandtALubrechtAA. Multilevel matrix multiplication and fast solution of integral equations. J Comput Phys1990; 90: 348–370.
24.
WangJQuSYangP. Simplified multigrid technique for the numerical solution to the steady-state and transient EHL line contacts and the arbitrary entrainment EHL point contacts. Tribol Int2001; 34: 191–202.
25.
WuBWenZWangH. Numerical investigations into the effects of oil contamination and surface roughness on wheel-rail adhesion. Adv Sci Lett2011; 4: 2246–2250.
26.
OhyamaT. Tribological studies on adhesion phenomena between wheel and rail at high speeds. Wear1991; 144: 263–267.
