In this article, we use Isaac Asimov's Foundation trilogy as a case study, analyzing the events that occur in the novels in order to reflect on metanarratives and their applicability to organizational realities. We argue that metanarratives, while perhaps attractive from a legitimacy perspective, are neither epistemologically defensible nor desirable for the development of organization studies. We conclude by arguing that narrative fiction in general, and science fiction in particular, provides an important addition to traditional approaches to organization studies and an interesting alternative perspective on the role of metanarratives.
References
1.
Asimov, I. (1967) Foundation. London: Panther Publishing.
2.
Asimov, I. (1979) Second Foundation. London: Panther Publishing.
3.
Asimov, I. (1984) Foundation and Empire. New York: Del Rey Books.
4.
Astley, W. Graham and Zammuto, Raymond (1992) `Organization Science, Managers, and Language Games', Organization Science3(4): 443-460.
5.
Boden, D. (1994) The Business of Talk. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
Buck, R.C. (1963) `Reflexive Predictions', Philosophy of Science30: 359-369.
7.
Burrell, Gibson (1997) Pandemonium: Towards a Retro-organization Theory. London: Sage.
8.
Czarniawska, Barbara (1997) `The Four Times Told Tale: Combining Narrative and Scientific Knowledge in Organizational Studies', Organization4(1): 51-74.
9.
Czarniawska-Joerges, B. and de Monthoux, P.Q. (1994) Good Novels, Better Management. Reading: Harwood.
10.
Donaldson, Lex (1996) For Positivist Organization Theory: Proving the Hard Core. London: Sage.
11.
Feyerabend, P.K. (1988) Against Method (Rev. edn). London: Verso.
12.
Glaser, Barney G. and Strauss, Anselm, L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
13.
Hambrick, Donald C. (1994) `What if the Academy Actually Mattered?', Academy of Management Review19(1): 11-16.
14.
Hassard, John (1996) `Exploring the Terrain of Modernism and Postmodernism in Organization Theory', in David M. Boje, Robert P. Gephart, Jr and Tojo Joseph Thatchenkery Postmodern Management and Organization Theory, pp. 45-59. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Jermier, John M. (1985) `When the Sleeper Wakes: A Short Story Extending Themes in Radical Organizational Theory', Journal of Management11(2): 67-80.
16.
Kaghan, William N. and Phillips, N. (1998) `Building the Tower of Babel: Communities of Practice and Paradigmatic Pluralism in Organization', Organization5(2): 191-215.
17.
Kreiger, Susan (1983) The Mirror Dance: Identity in a Woman's Community. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University.
18.
Lyotard, Jean-François (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
19.
Mauws, M. and Phillips, N. (1995) `Understanding Language Games', Organization Science6(3): 322-334.
20.
Parker, Martin (1993) `Life after Jean-François', in John Hassard and Martin Parker (eds) Postmodernism and Organizations. London: Sage.
21.
Pfeffer, Jeffrey (1993) `Barriers to the Advancement of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable', Academy of Management Review18(4): 599-620.
22.
Phillips, Nelson (1995) `Telling Tales: On the Role of Narrative Fiction in Organizational Analysis', Organization Studies16(4): 625-649.
23.
Reed, Michael (1993) `Organizations and Modernity: Continuity and Discontinuity in Organization Theory', in John Hassard and Martin Parker (eds) Postmodernism and Organizations, pp. 163-182. London: Sage.
24.
Romanos, George D. (1994) `Reflexive Predictions', in Michael Martin and Lee C. McIntyre (eds) Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, pp. 145-156. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
Rorty, Richard (1989) Contingency, Irony, Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Van Maanen, J. (1979) `The Facts of Fiction in Organizational Ethnography', Administrative Sciences Quarterly24: 539-550.
27.
Wren, Daniel A. (1994) The Evolution of Managerial Thought. New York: John Wiley.
28.
Yin, Robert K. (1984) Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Zald, Meyer (1993) `Organization Studies as a Scientific and Humanistic Enterprise', Organization Science4(4): 513-528.
