Managerial Technology and Netted Networks. `Competitiveness' in Action: The Work of Translating Performance in a High-Tech Firm

Abstract

Organizational practices weave in and out of different networks. In this paper, we argue and illustrate that the existence and importance of networks in organizations vary according to particular management concerns. Some networks are typically dormant and are called forth only in situations of `crisis'; they may be invisible to organizational participants in conditions of normality. Via organizational concerns, such as hierarchy and control, productivity and profitability, in some episodes some networks (which we call managerial technologies) are made important to condition other networks that operate in continuous time (we call them business technologies). The paper's empirical domain is a small high-tech producer in Denmark. The paper discusses the linkages between actor networks, attempts to discuss how each makes claims to `competitiveness' and assesses how they mobilize each other in situations where one network is impacting on other networks to condition and change them. This reflects the intricate effects of different networks all having a spokesperson and a materiality that claim privileged access to `competitiveness' and its translation into organizational decision-making.

References

Callon, M. (1986a) `The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle', in M. Callon , J. Law and A. Rip (eds) The Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World, pp. 19-34. London: Macmillan Press.

Callon, M. (1986b) `Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay', in J. Law (ed.) Power Action and Belief-A New Sociology of Knowledge, pp. 196-233. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 196-233.

Chua, W. (1995) `Experts, Networks and Inscriptions in the Fabrication of Accounting Image: A Story of the Representation of Three Public Hospitals', Accounting, Organization and Society 20(2/3): 111-145.

Cooper, R. and Law, J. (1995) `Organisation: Distal and Proximal Views', in S. Bacharac , P. Gagliardi and B. Mundell (eds) Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Studies of Organizations in the European Tradition, pp. 237-274. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Joerges, B. and Czarniawska, B. (1998) `The Question of Technology, or How Organizations Inscribe the World', Organization Studies 19(3): 363-385.

Korzybski, A. (1958) Science and Sanity. Lakeville, CT: Society for General Semantics.

Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (1991) `Technology is Society Made Durable', in J. Law (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters? Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, pp. 103-131. London: Sage.

Law, J. (1994) Organizing Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

10.

Law, J. and Mol, A. (1995) `Notes on Materiality and Sociality', The Sociological Review 43: 2 74-94.

11.

Miller, P. and Rose, N. (1990) `Governing Economic Life', Economy and Society 19(1): 1-31.

12.

Munro, R. (1993) `Just When You Thought It Safe to Enter the Water: Accountability, Language Games and Multiple Control Technologies', Accounting, Management & Information Technologies 3(4): 249-271.

13.

Munro, R. and Hatherly, D. (1993) `Accountablility and the New Commercial Agenda', Critical Perspectives on Accounting 4(4): 369-395.

14.

Preston, A. , Cooper, D. and Coombs, R. (1992) `Fabricating Budgets: A Study of the Production of Management Budgeting in the National Health Service', Accounting, Organization and Society 17(6): 561-593.

15.

Robson, K. (1992) `Accounting Numbers as "Inscription": Action at a Distance and the Development of Accounting', Accounting, Organization and Society 17(7): 685-708.