The paper introduces a theory of organizations built on the assumption that human behavior in organizational settings is relatively undetermined, multidirectional, and contradictory. Consistent with this assumption, the paper proposes a constructivist perspective on organizational persistence, equilibration, and structuration. The constructivist perspective represents an attempt at integrating extant, and often treated as incommensurable, theories of organizations within a complex framework.
References
1.
Bouchikhi, H. (1990) Structuration des organizations: concepts constructivistes et etude de cas. Paris: Economica.
2.
Bourdieu, P. (1976) `Le champ scientifique', Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales (June): 88-104.
3.
Bourdieu, P. (1984) Questions de Sociologie. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
4.
Burns, T. and Stalker, G.M. (1963) The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock.
5.
Clegg, S. (1981) `Organization and Control', Administrative Science Quarterly26: 545-562.
6.
Crozier, M. (1964) The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
7.
Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983) `The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields', American Sociological Review48: 147-160.
9.
Donaldson, L. (1995) Anti-management American Theories of Organization: A Critique of Paradigm Proliferation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Drazin, R. and Sandelands, L. (1992) `Autogenesis: A Perspective on the Process of Organizing', Organization Science3(2): 230-249.
11.
Garajedaghi, J. and Ackoff, R. (1984) `Mechanisms, Organisms, and Social Systems', Strategic Management Journal5: 289-300.
12.
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
13.
Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
Hassard, J. (1991) `Multiple Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: A Case Study', Organization Studies12: 275-299.
15.
Katz, D. and Kahn, R. (1966) The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: Wiley.
16.
Kimberly, J.R. and Miles, R. (1980) The Organizational Life Cycle. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Lawrence, P.R. and Lorsch, J.W. (1969) Organization and Environment. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
18.
Mintzberg, H. (1978) `Patterns in Strategy Formulation', Management Science24: 934-948.
19.
Morgan, G. (1986) Images of Organization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Morgan, G. (1990) `Paradigm Diversity in Organizational Research', in J. Hassard and D. Pym (eds) The Theory and Philosophy of Organizations Critical Issues and New Perspectives, pp. 13-29. London: Routledge.
21.
Pettigrew, A.M. (1985) The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in Organizations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
22.
Pfeffer, J. (1993) `Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science. Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable', Academy of Management Review18: 599-620.
23.
Piaget, J. (1968) Le structuralisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, Collection Que Sais-je?
24.
Ruffier, J. (1987) `La gestion de lautomatisation: un module Mexicain', Revue FranQaise de Gestion64: 35-43.
25.
Stinchcombe, A.L. (1965) `Social Structure and Organizations', in J.G. March (ed.) Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally.
26.
Tushman, M.L and Romanelli, E. (1985) `Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation', in L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior 7, pp. 171-222. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
27.
Van de Ven, A.H. and Poole, M.S. (1995) `Explaining Development and Change in Organizations', Academy of Management Review20: 510-540.
