Research in management has become more and more differentiated and complex. In organization theory and strategic management one can find different approaches, concepts, and theories, which are not only diverse, but often give contradictory advice. Therefore, it has become difficult for both the researcher and the practitioner to find appropriate answers to theoretical and practical problems. This is especially true in a situation of incommensurability where no objective frame of reference to evalute competing perspectives exists. Although in organization theory this problem has been discussed for over 20 years, no acceptable solution has been found. Instead, as recent paradigm discussions have shown, the differences have become even greater. The purpose of this special issue is to review the current state of the pluralism discussion in organization theory and to find new ways to handle the problems of pluralism, diversity, and incommensurability. In this paper I will give an introduction to the special issue. I will explain the concept of incommensurability and will review the paradigm discussion in strategic management and organization theory. In the second part of the paper I will give an overview of the contributions to this special issue.
References
1.
Albert, H. (1985) Treatise on Critical Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2.
Aldrich, H.E. (1988) `Paradigm Warriors. Donaldson versus the Critics of Organization Theory', Organization Studies9: 19-25.
3.
Andersson, G. (1994) Criticism and the History of Science. Kuhn's, Lakatos's and Feyerabend's Criticisms of Critical Rationalism. Leiden: Brill.
4.
Andrews, K.R. (1971) The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
5.
Ansoff, I. (1965) Corporate Strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Astley, W.G. and Van de Ven, A.H. (1983) `Critical Perspectives and Debates in Organization Theory', Administrative Science Quarterly28: 245-273.
8.
Bettis, R.A. (1991) `Strategic Management and the Straightjacket: An Editorial Essay', Organization Science2: 315-321.
9.
Bowman, E.H. (1990) `Strategy Changes. Possible Worlds and Actual Minds', in J.W. Fredrickson (ed.) Perspectives on Strategic Management, pp. 9-37. New York: Harper Business.
10.
Bowman, E.H. (1995) `Strategy History: Through Different Mirrors', Advances in Strategic Management11A: 25-45.
11.
Burrell, G. (1996) `Normal Science, Paradigms, Metaphors, Discourses and Genealogies of Analysis', in S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy. and W.R. Nord (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies, pp. 642-658. London: Sage.
12.
Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
13.
Butts, R.E. and Brown, J.R. (eds) (1989) Constructivism and Science. Essays in Recent German philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
14.
Camerer, C. (1985) `Redirecting Research in Business Policy and Strategy', Strategic Management Journal6: 1-15.
15.
Cannella, A.A., Jr and Paetzold, R.L. (1994) `Pfeffer's Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: A Rejoinder', Academy of Management Review19: 331-341.
16.
Christenson, Ch. (1976) `Proposals for a Program of Empirical Research into the Properties of Triangles', Decision Sciences4: 631-648.
17.
Clegg, S.R. and Hardy, C. (1996): `Organizations. Organization and Organizing', in S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy and W.R. Nord (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies. pp. 1-28. London: Sage.
18.
Daft, R.L. and Buenger, V. (1990) `Hitching a Ride on a Fast Train to Nowhere. The Past and Future of Management Research', in J.W. Fredrickson (ed.) Perspectives on Strategic Management, pp. 81-103. New York: Harper Business.
19.
Daft, R.L. and Lewin, A.Y. (1993) `Where are the Theories for the "New" Organizational Forms? An Editorial Essay', Organization Science4: i-iv.
20.
Deetz, S. (1996) `Describing Differences in Approaches to Organization Science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and Their Legacy', Organization Science7: 191-207.
21.
Donaldson, L. (1985) In Defence of Organization Theory. A Reply to the Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Donaldson, L. (1988) `In Successful Defence of Organization Theory. A Routing of the Critics', Organization Studies9: 28-32.
23.
Donaldson, L. (1995) Anti-management American Theories of Organization: A Critique of Paradigm Proliferation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Donaldson, L. (1996) For Positivist Organization Theory. Proving the Hard Core. London: Sage.
Evered, R. and Louis, M.R. (1981) `Alternative Perspectives in the Organizational Science: "Inquiry From the Inside" and "Inquiry From the Outside", Academy of Management Review6: 385-395.
27.
Feyerabend, P (1975) Against Method. Thetford: Lowe and Brydone.
28.
Feyerabend, P. (1987) Farewell to Reason. London: Verso.
29.
Freeman, R.E. and Lorange, P. (1985) `Theory Building in Strategic Management'. Advances in Strategic Management3: 9-38.
30.
Foss, N.J. (1996) `Research in Strategy, Economics, and Michael Porter', Journal of Management Studies33: 1-24.
31.
Fuchs, S. and Ward, S. (1994) `What is Deconstruction, and Where and When Does it Take Place? Making Facts in Science. Building Cases in Law', American Sociological Review59, 481-500.
32.
Giddens, A. (1976) New Rules for Sociological Method. New York: Basic Books.
33.
Giddens, A. (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34.
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
35.
Gilbert, D.R., Jr , Hartman, E., Mauriel, J.J. and Freeman, R.E. (1988) A Logic for Strategy. New York: Ballinger.
36.
Gioia, D.A. and Pitre, E. (1990) `Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building', Academy of Management Review15: 584-602
37.
Gioia, D.A. , Donnellon, A. and Sims, H.P., Jr (1989) `Communication and Cognition in Appraisal: A Tale of Two Paradigms', Organization Studies10: 503-529.
38.
Godfrey, P.C. and Hill, Ch.W.L. (1995) `The Problem of Unobservables in Strategic Management Research', Strategic Management Journal16: 519-533.
39.
Gopinath, C. and Hoffman. R.C. (1995) `The Relevance of Strategy Research: Practitioner and Academic Viewpoints', Journal of Management Studies32, 575 ff.
40.
Grimes, A.J. and Rood, D.L. (1995) `Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Descriptive Epistemologies', in W. Natter, T.R. Schatzki and J.P. Jones III (eds) Objectivity and its Other, pp. 161-178, New York: Guildford Press.
41.
Habermas, J. (1971) Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
42.
Hambrick, D.C. (1994) `What if the Academy Actually Mattered?, Academy of Management Review19: 11-16.
Hassard, J. (1988) `Overcoming Hermeticism in Organization Theory. An Alternative to Paradigm Incommensurability', Human Relations41: 247-259.
45.
Hassard, J. (1991) `Multiple Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: A Case Study', Organization Studies12, 275-299.
46.
Hassard, J. (1993) Sociology and Organization Theory. Positivism, Paradigms and Postmodernity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Hassard, J. and Parker, M. (eds) (1994) Towards a New Theory of Organization. London: Routledge.
48.
Hassard, J. and Pym, D. (eds) (1990) The Theory and Philosophy of Organizations. Critical Issues and New Perspectives. London: Routledge.
49.
Hinings, C.R. (1988) `Defending Organization Theory. A British View from North America', Organization Studies9: 2-7.
50.
Jackson, N. and Carter, P. (1991) `In Defence of Paradigm Incommensurability', Organization Studies12: 109-127.
51.
Jackson, N. and Carter, P. (1993) `"Paradigm Wars". A Response to Hugh Willmott', Organization Studies14: 721-725.
52.
Kambartel, F. (1991) `Versuch fiber das Verstehen', in B. McGuinness, J. Habermas, K.-O. Apel, R. Rorty, Ch. Taylor, F. Kambartel and A. Wellmer (eds), Der Lowe spricht... und wir kónnen ihn nicht verstehen, pp. 121-137. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
53.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
54.
Kuhn, T.S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
55.
Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds) (1970) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press.
56.
Learned, E.P. , Christensen, C.R., Andrews, K.R. and Guth, W.D. (1965) Business Policy. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
57.
Lueken, G.-L. (1991) `Incommensurability, Rules of Argumentation, and Anticipation', in F.H. van Eemerenet al. (eds). Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation, Amsterdam: SicSat.
58.
Lueken, G.-L. (1992) Inkommensurabilitát als Problem rationalen Argumentierens. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.
59.
McKelvey, B. (1997) `Quasi-natural Organization Science', Organization Science8: 352-380.
60.
McKinley, W. (1995) `Comment', Advances in Strategic Management12A: 249-260.
61.
Mahoney, J.T. (1993) `Strategic Management and Determinism. Sustaining the Conversation', Journal of Management Studies30: 173-191.
62.
Marsden, R. (1993) `The Politics of Organizational Analysis', Organization Studies14: 93-124.
63.
Mintzberg, H. (1990) `Strategy Formation. Schools of Thought', in J.W. Fredrickson (ed.) Perspectives on Strategic Management, pp. 105-236. New York: Harper Business.
64.
Mittelstrass, J. (1977) Changing Concepts of the A-priori', in R.E. Butts and J. Hintikka (eds) Historical and Philosophical Dimensions of Logic. Methodology and Philosophy of Science, pp. 3-128. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
65.
Mittelstrass, J. (1985) `Scientific Rationality and its Reconstruction', in N. Rescher (ed.) Reason and Rationality in Natural Science, pp. 83-102. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
66.
Mone, M.A. and McKinley, W. (1993) `The Uniqueness Value and its Consequences for Organizational Studies', Journal of Management Inquiry2: 284-296.
67.
Montgomery, C.A. , Wernerfelt, B. and Balakrishnan, S. (1989) `Strategy Content and the Research Process. A Critique and Commentary', Strategic Management Journal10: 189-197.
68.
Montgomery, C.A. , Wernerfelt, B. and Balakrishnan, S. (1991) `Strategy and the Research Process. A Reply', Strategic Management Journal12: 83-84.
69.
Morgan, G. (ed.) (1983) Beyond Method, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
70.
Morgan, G. (1986) Images of Organization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
71.
Morgan, G. (1990) `Paradigm Diversity in Organizational Research', in J. Hassard and D. Pym (eds) The Theory and Philosophy of Organizations Critical Issues and New Perspectives, pp. 13-29. London: Routledge.
72.
Morrow, R.A. and Brown, D.D. (1994) `Critical Theory and Methodology'. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
73.
Paine, F.T. (1979) `Commentary', in D.E. Schendel and C.W. Hofer (eds) Strategic Management. A View of Business Policy and Planning, pp. 417-423. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
74.
Parker, M. and McHugh, G. (1991) `Five Texts in Search of an Author: A Response to John Hassard's "Multiple Paradigms and Organizational Analysis"', Organization Studies, 12: 451-456.
75.
Perrow, Ch. (1994) `Pfeffer Slips!', Academy of Management Review19: 191-194.
76.
Pfeffer, J. (1982) Organizations and Organization Theory. Boston, MA: Pitman.
77.
Pfeffer, J. (1993) `Barriers to the Advance of Organzational Science. Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable', Academy of Management Review18: 599-620.
78.
Pfeffer, J. (1997) New Directions for Organization Theory. Problems and Prospects. New York: Oxford University Press.
79.
Piaget, J. (1968) Le Structuralisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
80.
Piaget, J. (1979) Epistemologie Ginetique, 3rd edn.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
81.
Popper, K.R. (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
82.
Popper, K.R. (1969) Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.
83.
Popper, K.R. (1972) Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
84.
Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (eds) (1994) `In Search for New Paradigms', Strategic Management Journal15, Special Issue. Chichester: Wiley.
85.
Radnitzky, G. and Andersson, G. (eds) (1978) Progress and Rationality in Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
86.
Reed, M.I. (1985) Redirections in Organizational Analysis. London: Tavistock.
87.
Reed, M.I. (1992) The Sociology of Organizations. Themes, Perspectives and Prospects. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
88.
Reed, M. (1996) `Organizational Theorizing: A Historically Contested Terrain', in S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy and W.R. Nord (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies, pp. 31-56. London: Sage.
89.
Reed, M.I. and Hughes, M. (eds) (1992) Rethinking Organization. New Directions in Organization Theory and Analysis. London: Sage.
90.
Rouleau, L. and Seguin, F. (1995) `Strategy and Organization Theories: Common Forms of Discourse', Journal of Management Studies32: 101-117.
91.
Rumelt, R.P. , Schendel, D.E. and Teece, D.J. (eds) (1994) Fundamental Issues in Strategy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
92.
Schendel, D.E. (1994) `Introduction to the Summer 1994 Special Issue: Strategy: Search for New Paradigms', Strategic Management Journal15: 1-4.
93.
Schendel, D.E. (1995) `Strategy Futures: What's Left to Worry About?', Advances in Strategic ManagementlB: 143-188.
94.
Schendel, D.E. and Hofer, Ch. (eds) (1979a) Strategic Management. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
95.
Schendel, D.E. and Hofer, Ch. (1979b) `Theory Building and Theory Testing in Strategic Management', in D.E. Schendel and Ch. Hofer (eds) Strategic Management, pp. 382-394. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
96.
Scherer, A.G. (1995) Pluralismus im strategischen Management. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
97.
Scherer, A.G. and Dowling, M. (1995) `Towards a Reconciliation of the Theory-Pluralism in Strategic Management-Incommensurability and the Constructivist Approach of the Erlangen School', Advances in Strategic Management12A: 195-247.
98.
Scherer, A.G. and Steinmann, H. (1997) `Some Remarks on the Problem of Incommensurability in Organization Studies', paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Boston, MA, August 1997.
99.
Schultz, M. and Hatch, M.J. (1996) `Living With Multiple Paradigms: The Case of Paradigm Interplay in Organizational Culture Studies', Academy of Management Review21: 529-557.
100.
Seth, A. and Zinkhan, G. (1991) `Strategy and the Research Process. A Comment', Strategic Management Journal12: 75-82.
101.
Shrivastava, P. (1987) `Rigor and Practical Usefulness of Research in Strategic Management', Strategic Management Journal8: 77-92.
102.
Silverman, D. (1970) The Theory of Organizations. London: Heinemann.
103.
Smircich, L. and Stubbart, Ch. (1985) `Strategic Management in an Enacted World', Academy of Management Review10: 724-736.
104.
Spender, J.-C. (1992) `Strategy Theorizing: Expanding the Agenda', Advances in Strategic Management8: 3-32.
105.
Spender, J-C. (1995) `Organizations are Activity Systems, Not Merely Systems of Thought', Advances in Strategic Management12B: 153-174.
106.
Steffy, B.D. and Grimes, A.J. (1986) `A Critical Theory of Organization Science', Academy of Management Review11: 322-336.
107.
Thomas, H. and McGee, J. (1986) `Introduction: Mapping Strategic Management Research', in J. McGee and H. Thomas (eds) Strategic Management Research. A European Perspective, pp. 1-18. London: Wiley.
108.
Thomas, H. and Pruett, M. (1993) `Introduction to the Special Issue. Perspectives on Theory Building in Strategic Management', Journal of Management Studies30: 3-10.
109.
Van Maanen. J. (1995) `Style as Theory', Organization Science6: 133-143.
110.
Weaver, G.R. and Gioia, D. (1994) `Paradigms Lost: Incommensurability vs. Structurationist Inquiry', Organization Studies15: 565-590.
111.
Whittington. R. (1993) What is Strategy and Does it Matter?London and New York: Routledge.
112.
Willmott, H. (1993a) `Breaking the Paradigm Mentality', Organization Studies14: 681-719.
113.
Willmott, H. (1993b) `Paradigm Gridlock: A Reply', Organization Studies14: 727-730.
