This paper approaches the question of how we see (and know) by investigating the historically changing nature of the self that views. Recognizing that viewing in geometrical perspective requires the self to combine two different fixed views, it traces the history of what it therefore sees as a doubling or splitting of the self. It first shows how the perspectivally viewing self is made possible by an earlier medieval splitting and immobilizing of the self, and that it remains thereafter in its essence split. It then points to an internal evolution in this split self in the late 18th century, as it comes alive as the self-examining self. It links the development of both the medieval and 18th-century reconstructions of the self to changes in the practices through which humans learn. It concludes by reflecting on the relation between this modern pygmalion-like form of the self and the viewing of the world as `organ'-ized.
References
1.
Alpers, S. (1982) The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Alpers, S. (1983) `Interpretation without Representation, or, the Viewing of Las Meninas', Representations1(1): 30-42.
3.
Baxandall, M. (1972) Painting and Experience in Fifteenth-Century Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
Bouwsma, W. (1980) `Anxiety and the Formation of Early Modern Culture', in B. Malament (ed.) After the Reformation: Essays in Honor of J.H. Hexter, pp. 215-246. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
5.
Crombie, A. (1980) `Science and the Arts in the Renaissance: the Search for Truth and Certainty, Old and New', History of Science18: 233-246.
6.
Edgerton, S. (1975) The Renaissance Rediscovery of Linear Perspective. New York: Basic Books.
7.
Foucault, M. (1974) The Order of Things. London: Tavistock.
8.
Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish. London: Allen Lane.
9.
Foucault, M. (1984a) Histoire de la Sexualité, vol. 2: L'Usage des Plaisirs. Paris: Gallimard.
10.
Foucault, M. (1984b) Histoire de la Sexualité, vol. 3: Le Souci de Soi. Paris: Gallimard.
11.
Foucault, M. (1987) `What is Enlightenment?', in P. Rabinow (ed.) The Foucault Reader, pp. 32-50. London: Penguin.
12.
Haring, N. (1982) `Commentary and Hermeneutics', in R. Benson and G. Constable (eds) Renaissance and Renewal in the Twelfth Century, pp. 173-200. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
13.
Hoskin, K. (1992) `Control, Organization and Accounting: A Genealogy of Modern Knowledge-Power', Systems Practice5(4): 425-439.
14.
Hoskin, K. (1993) `Education and the Genesis of Disciplinarity: the Unexpected Reversal', in E. Messer-Davidow, D. Shumway and D. Sylvan (eds) Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity, pp. 271-304. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
15.
Hoskin, K. and Macve, R. (1986) `Accounting and the Examination: a Genealogy of Disciplinary Power', Accounting, Organizations and Society11(2): 105-136.
16.
Hoskin, K. and Macve, R. (1994) `Writing, Examining, Disciplining: the Genesis of Accounting's Modern Power', in A. Hopwood and P. Miller (eds) Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice, pp. 67-97. Cambridge: CUP.
17.
Ivins, W. (1938) On the Rationalization of Sight. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.
18.
Ivins, W. (1946) Art and Geometry: A Study in Space Intuitions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
Ivins, W. (1953) Prints and Visual Communication. London: Routledge.
20.
Jones, R. (1990) `Educational Practices and Scientific Knowledge: a Genealogical Reinterpretation of the Emergence of Physiology in Post-Revolutionary France', in S. Ball (ed.) Foucault and Education, pp. 78-104. London: Routledge.
21.
Kemp, M. (1978) `Science, Non-Science and Nonsense: The Interpretation of Brunelleschi's Perspective', Art History1(2): 134-161.
22.
Lemay, R. (1977) `The Hispanic Origin of our Present Numeral Forms', Viator8: 435-462.
23.
McLuhan, M. (1962) The Gutenberg Galaxy: the Making of Typographic Man. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
24.
Myers, M. (1985) The Soul of Modern Economic Man: Ideas of Self-Interest from Thomas Hobbes to Adam Smith. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Ong, W. (1956) `Symbolism, Space, and Intellect in Renaissance Symbolism', Bibliotheque d'Humanisme et Renaissance18: 222-239.
26.
Ong, W. (1971) `Romantic Difference and the Poetics of Technology', in Rhetoric, Romance and Technology, pp. 255-283. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
27.
Ong, W. (1982) Orality and Literacy. London: Methuen.
28.
Pickstone, J. (1981) `Bureaucracy, Liberalism and the Body in Post-Revolutionary France: Bichat's Physiology and the Paris School of Medicine', History of Science19: 115-142.
29.
Raphael, D. (1975) `The Impartial Spectator', in A. Skinner and T. Wilson (eds) Essays on Adam Smith, pp. 83-99. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
30.
Rorty, R. (1980) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Oxford: Blackwell.
31.
Rouse, R. and Rouse, M. (1982) `Statim Invenire: Schools, Preachers and New attitudes to the Page', in R. Benson and G. Constable (eds) Renaissance and Renewal in the Twelfth Century, pp. 201-228. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
32.
Saenger, P. (1982) `Silent Reading: its Impact on Late Medieval Script and Society', Viator13: 367-414.
33.
Schaffer, S. (1992) `Self Evidence', Critical Inquiry18: 327-362.
34.
Smith, A. (1761/1976) The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
35.
Veyne, P. (1993) `The Final Foucault and His Ethics', Critical Inquiry20: 1-9.
36.
Yates, F. (1966) The Art of Memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
