AbdallahC. (2024) ‘Against Mastery: Epistemic Decolonizing in the Margins of the Business School’, Management Learning. Published online before print March 18, doi: 10.1177/13505076241236341.
2.
Al-AmoudiI. (2023) ‘The Politics of Post-Human Technologies: Human Enhancements, Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality’, Organization30(6): 1238–45.
3.
AnzaldúaG.MoragaC. (1981) ‘This Bridge Called My Back’, New York: Kitchen Table.
4.
BaradK. (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
BenozzoA.CareyN.CozzaM., et al. (2019) ‘Disturbing the AcademicConferenceMachine: Post-Qualitative Re-Turnings’, Gender, Work and Organization26(2): 87–106.
6.
BenozzoA.GherardiS. (2020) ‘Working Within the Shadow: What Do We Do With “Not-Yet” Data?’, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal15(2): 145–59.
7.
BozalekV. (2020) ‘Rendering Each Other Capable: Doing Response-Able Research Responsibly’, in MurrisK. (ed.) Navigating the Postqualitative, New Materialist and Critical Posthumanist Terrain Across Disciplines, pp. 135–49. London: Routledge.
8.
GherardiS. (2019) ‘Theorizing Affective Ethnography for Organization Studies’, Organization26(6): 741–60.
9.
GilsonE. (2011) ‘Vulnerability, Ignorance, and Oppression’, Hypatia26(2): 308–332.
10.
HarawayD. (1991) ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective’, in HarawayD. (ed.) Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, pp. 183–201. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
HuopalainenA. (2022) ‘Writing With the Bitches’, Organization29(6): 959–78.
12.
HuopalainenA.JammaersE. (2024) ‘“Making the Unimaginable Imaginable?” The Power of Artmaking in Understanding Animal Vulnerabilities and “Humanimal” Relationality in Organization Studies’, Organization. Published online before print March 19, doi: 10.1177/13505084241238584.
13.
JammulamadakaN.FariaA.JackG., et al. (2021) ‘Decolonising Management and Organisational Knowledge (MOK): Praxistical Theorising for Potential Worlds’, Organization28(5): 717–40.
14.
JaramilloL.CozzaM.HallinA., et al. (2024) ‘Readingwriting: Becoming-Together in a Composition’, Culture and Organization30(3): 291–304.
15.
Kaasila-PakanenA.-L.MandalakiE. (2023) ‘Hysterically Y-Ours: Reclaiming Academic Writing as a Hysterical Practice’, Organization. Published online before print November 2, doi: 10.1177/13505084231198436.
16.
MandalakiE.PéreztsM. (2022) ‘It Takes Two to Tango: Theorizing Inter-Corporeality Through Nakedness and Eros in Researching and Writing Organizations’, Organization29(4): 596–618.
17.
MandalakiE.van AmsterdamN.DaouE. (2022) ‘The Meshwork of Teaching Against the Grain: Embodiment, Affect and Art in Management Education’, Culture and Organization28(3–4): 245–62.
18.
MassumiB. (2002) Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19.
MeriläinenS.SalmelaT.ValtonenA. (2022) ‘Vulnerable relational knowing that matters’, Gender, Work & Organization29(1): 79–91.
PullenA.RhodesC. (2021) Organizing Corporeal Ethics: A Research Overview. London: Routledge.
22.
SantosV. M. (2018) ‘Disobedient Notes: Decoloniality and the Contribution to the Feminist Critique of Science’, Psicologia & Sociedade30: e200112.
23.
SheferT.BozalekV.RomanoN. (2023) Hydrofeminist Thinking With Oceans: Political and Scholarly Possibilities. London: Taylor & Francis.
24.
ValtonenA.PullenA. (2021) ‘Writing With Rocks’, Gender, Work & Organization28(2): 506.
25.
van AmsterdamN.KjærK. M.van EckD. (2022) ‘Becoming With Barad: A Material-Discursive-Affective Conversation’, in HunterC.KivinenN. (eds) Affect in Organization and Management, pp. 76–91. New York, NY: Routledge.