It is generally held that because of developments associated with late modernity large corporations are now much more visible and therefore more accountable. In this article, we challenge this idea and propose contrary and position: that precisely because of late modernity global corporations have become less accountable to their stakeholders. In particular, we argue that because of globalization, the explosion of scientific knowledge and the nature of risk in late modernity, it has in some respects become easier for corporations to conceal their unethical practices (making them less accountable). Drawing on sociological theory concerning late modernity, we seek is to demonstrate how the fashionable ‘ideology of visibility’ habors an insidious anti-democratic tendency apropos wider accountability. In light of this position, the article concludes by discussing the political implications and possibilities for rendering business corporations more democratically accountable.
Adam, B. and Groves, C. ( 2007) Future Matters: Action, Knowledge, Ethics. Leiden: Brill.
2.
Adams, C.A. ( 2004) ‘The Ethical, Social and Environmental Reporting Performance Portrayal Gap’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal17(5): 731-57.
3.
Adorno, T. and Horkheimer, M. ( 1943) Dialectic of the Enlightenment. London : Verso.
4.
Alvesson, M. and Deetz, S. ( 2006) ‘Critical and Postmodern Approaches to Organization Studies’, in S. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. Nord (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies, 2nd edn, pp. 191-217. London: Sage.
5.
Baker, H.K., Powell, G.E. and Weaver, D.G. ( 1999) ‘Listing Changes and Visibility Gains’, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics38(1): 46-63.
6.
Beck, U. ( 1992) Risk Society, trans. M.A. Ritter. London: Sage.
7.
Bohman, J. and Rehg, W. ( 2007) Jürgen Habermas. Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/habermas/.
8.
Brin, D. ( 1998) The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us To Choose Between Privacy and Freedom? Reading, MA: Perseus Books.
9.
Caincross, F. ( 1997) The Death of Distance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
10.
Castells, M. ( 1996) The Rise of the Network Society Vol 1: Information Economy. Cambridge: Blackwell. Chomsky, N. (2006) Failed States: The Abuse of Power and the Assault on Democracy. New York, NY: Hamish Hamilton.
11.
Clegg, S. ( 1990) Modern Organizations: Organization Studies in the Postmodern World. London: Sage.
12.
Davis, J.L. and Gandy, O.H. ( 1999) ‘Racial Identity and Media Orientation: Exploring the Nature of Constraint’, Journal of Black Studies29: 367-97.
13.
Deetz, S. ( 1992) Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonization. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
14.
Deetz, S. ( 2007) ‘Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Communication’, in S. May, G. Cheney and J. Roper (eds) The Debate Over Corporate Social Responsibility, pp 267-78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
Dicken, P. ( 2003) Global Shift. London: Paul Chapman.
16.
Eagleton, T. ( 2005) Holy Terror. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
Ettenson, R. and Klein, J.G. ( 2005) ‘The Fallout from French Nuclear Testing in the South Pacific: A Longitudinal Study of Consumer Boycotts’, International Marketing Review22(2): 199-224.
18.
Ettenson, R., Smith, N.C., Klein, J. and John, A. ( 2006) ‘Rethinking Consumer Boycotts’, Sloan Management Review47(4): 5-7.
19.
Fiss, P.C. and Zajac, E.J. ( 2006) ‘The Symbolic Management of Strategic Change: Sensegiving via Framing and Decoupling’, Academy of Management Review49(6): 1173-93.
20.
Fleming, P. and Zyglidopoulos, S. ( 2006) ‘Globalised Nature of Business Corruption Needs to be Taken into Account’, Financial Times October 16 2006.
21.
Freeman, R. ( 1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pittman.
22.
Friedman, M. ( 1970) ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine September 13 1970.
23.
Fung, A. ( 2003) ‘Deliberative Democracy and International Labor Standards’, Governance16: 51-71.
24.
Gabriel, Y. ( 2005) ‘Glass Cages and Glass Palaces: Images of Organization in Image-Conscious Times’, Organization12(1): 9-29.
25.
Gephart, R.P., Jr. ( 1984) ‘Making Sense of Organizationally Based Environmental Disasters’, Journal of Management10: 205-25.
26.
Gephart, R.P., Jr. ( 1988) ‘Managing the Meaning of a Sour Gas Well Blowout: The Public Culture of Organizational Disasters’, Industrial Crises Quarterly2: 17-32.
27.
Giddens, A. ( 1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge : Polity Press.
28.
Giddens, A. ( 1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge : Polity Press.
29.
Giddens, A. ( 1994) Beyond Left and Right. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30.
Giddens, A. ( 1999) ‘Risk and Responsibility’, Modern Law Review62(1): 1-10.
31.
Giddens, A. ( 2000) Runaway World. London : Routledge.
32.
Gioia, D.A. ( 1992) ‘Pinto Fires and Personal Ethics: A Script Analysis of Missed Opportunities’, Journal of Business Ethics11: 379-89.
33.
Habermas, J. ( 1993) ‘Remarks on the Discourse Ethics’, in J. Habermas (ed.) Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics, pp. 19-111. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
Habermas, J. ( 1996) Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
Harvey, D. ( 1989) The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford : Blackwell.
36.
Herman, E. and Chomsky, N. ( 1988) Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York, NY: Pantheon Books .
37.
Heugens, P.P.M. A. R. (2002) ‘Managing Public Affairs Through Storytelling’ , Journal of Public Affairs2(2): 57-70.
38.
Hummels, H. and Timmer, D. ( 2004) Investors in need of social, ethical, and environmental information. Journal of Business Ethics, 52 (1): 73-85.
39.
Jones, M. and Fleming, P. ( 2003) ‘Unpacking Complexity Through Critical Stakeholder Analysis: The Case of Globalisation’, Business and Society28(4): 430-54.
40.
Jones, T.M. ( 1995) ‘Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics’, Academy of Management Review20: 404-37.
41.
Kallinikos, J. ( 1996) Technology and Society. Munich: Accedo.
42.
Kelly, L. and Booth, C. ( 2004) Dictionary of Strategy. London: Sage.
43.
Kuhn, T. and Deetz, S. ( 2008) ‘Critical Theory and Corporate Social Responsibility: Can and Should We Get Beyond Cynical Reasoning?’, in A. Crane, A. McWilliams , D. Matten, J. Moon and D. Siegel (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, pp. 173-96. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
44.
Lash, S. and Urry, J. ( 1994) Economies of Signs of Space. London : Sage.
45.
Lawrence, T. and Phillips, N. ( 2002) ‘Understanding Cultural Industries’, Journal of Management Inquiry11(4): 430-41.
46.
McCombs, M.E. and Shaw, D.L. ( 1972) ‘The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media’ , Public Opinion Quarterly36: 176-87.
47.
McCombs, M. and Ghanem, S.I. ( 2001) ‘The Convergence of Agenda Setting and Framing’ , in S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr. and A. E. Grant (eds) Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World, pp. 67-83. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48.
McDougall, D. ( 2007) ‘Child Sweatshop Shame Threatens Gap’s Ethical Image’, The Guardian Sunday October 28 2007.
49.
McLeod, J., Becker, I.B. and Byrnes, J.E. ( 1974) ‘Another Look at the Agenda-Setting Function of the Press’, Communication Research1: 131-66.
50.
Matten, D. and Crane, A. ( 2005) ‘Corporate Citizenship: Toward An Extended Theoretical Conceptualization’, Academy of Management Review30(1): 166-79.
51.
Monks, R.A.G. and Minow, N. ( 1991) Power and Accountability. New York NY: Harper Business.
52.
Moses, R.L., (2010) ‘As a Building Burns, Beijing Bites Its Tongue’ , The Wall Street Journal. Available at: http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2010/11/19/as-a-building-burns-beijing-bites-its-tongue/ (accessed November 30, 2010).
53.
Napoleoni, L. ( 2008) Rogue Economics. New York, NY: Seven Stories Press.
54.
Oliver, R.W. ( 2004) What is Transparency?New York, NY : McGraw-Hill.
55.
Palazzo, G. and Scherer, A.G. ( 2006) ‘Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework’, Journal of Business Ethics66: 71-88.
56.
Peel, M. ( 2006) ‘Third of Companies Think They Have Been Hit by Bribery’, Financial Times October 9 2006.
57.
Phillips, M. ( 2002) ‘Global Rules for Corporate Accountability’ , Multinational Monitor23(10/11): 12-15.
58.
Rehbein, K., Waddock, S. and Graves, S.B. ( 2004) ‘Understanding Shareholder Activism: Which Corporations Are Targeted?’, Business and Society43(3): 239-67.
59.
Rossant, J., Ewing, J. and Bremmer, B. ( 2002) ‘The Corporate Cleanup Goes Global’, Businessweek. Available from: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/02-18/b3781709.htm (accessed November 30, 2010).
60.
Scherer, A.G. and Palazzo, G. ( 2007) ‘Towards a Political Conception of Corporate Social Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective’ , Academy of Management Review32(4): 1096-120.
61.
Scherer, A.G. and Palazzo, G. ( 2010) ‘The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World-A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy’, Journal of Management Studies , in press.
62.
Scherer, A.G. and Smid, M. ( 2000) ‘The Downward Spiral and the US Model Business Principles-Why MNCs Should Take Responsibility for the Improvement of World-Wide Social and Environmental Conditions’, Management International Review40(4): 351-71.
63.
Schubert, S. and Miller, C.T. ( 2008) ‘At Siemens, Bribery Was Just a Line Item’ , a joint report by ProPublica, a nonprofit investigative journalism organization, PBS’s ‘Frontline’ and The New York Times. Available from: http://salises.mona.uwi.edu/sem2_08_09/SALI6105/At%20Siemens%20bribing%20was%20usual_6105.pdf (accessed November 20 2010).
64.
Shaw, D. L. and McCombs, M. E., eds (1977) The Emergence of American Political Issues: The Agenda Setting Function of the Press. St. Paul, MN: West.
65.
Shoemaker, P.J. and Reese, S.D. ( 1996) Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. White Plains, NY: Longman.
66.
Sloterdijk, P. ( 1988) The Critique of Cynical Reason. London : Verso.
67.
Tapscott, D. and Ticoll, D. ( 2003) The Naked Corporation: How the Age of Transparency Will Revolutionize Business. New York, NY: Free Press.
68.
Thompson, J.B. ( 1995) The Media and Modernity. Cambridge : Polity Press
69.
Tsoukas, H. ( 1999) ‘David and Goliath in the Risk Society: Making Sense of the Conflict Between Shell and Greenpeace in the North Sea’, Organization6(3): 499-528.
70.
Vattimo, G. ( 1992) The Transparent Society. Baltimore , MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
71.
Wynne, B. ( 1992) ‘Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science’, Public Understanding of Science1: 281-304.
72.
Zyglidopoulos, C.S. ( 2002) ‘The Social and Environmental Responsibilities of Multinationals: Evidence from the Brent Spar Case’, Journal of Business Ethics36(1-2): 141-51.
