In this article, I propose a middle way between current process and substance theorizing as I argue that both ‘pure’ views are fraught with theoretical problems. I base my proposal on the ontologies of Aristotle and A.N. Whitehead, who both maintain that being and becoming are equally important for a comprehensive analysis of change processes. Drawing on their insights, I develop a conceptual frame that distinguishes between change and becoming, and proposes to use the pairs of potentiality-actuality and activity-relationality as notions that are less fraught with conceptual baggage and more relevant empirically than the distinction between substance and process.
Aquinas, T. ( 1993) ‘Summa theologica’, in M. Adler (ed.) Great Books of the Western World. Chicago, IL: Encyclopedia Britannica.
2.
Aristotle (1993a) ‘Categories’, in M. Adler (ed.) Great Books of the Western World, pp. 5-21. Chicago, IL: Encyclopedia Britannica.
3.
Aristotle (1993b) ‘Metaphysics’, in M. Adler (ed.) Great Books of the Western World, pp. 499-626. Chicago, IL: Encyclopedia Britannica.
4.
Aristotle (1993c) ‘Physics’, in M. Adler (ed.) Great Books of the Western World, pp. 259-355. Chicago. IL : Encyclopedia Britannica.
5.
Bakken, T. and Hernes, T. ( 2006) ‘Organizing is Both a Verb and a Noun: Weick Meets Whitehead’, Organization Studies27(11): 1598-616.
6.
Barnett, W. and Carroll, G. ( 1995) ‘Modeling Internal Organizational Change’ , Annual Review of Sociology21: 217-36.
7.
Bergson, H. ( 1911) Creative Evolution. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
8.
Bergson, H. ( 1993) ‘An Introduction to Metaphysics’, in M. Adler (ed.) Great Books of the Western World, pp. 71-89. Chicago, IL: Encyclopedia Britannica.
9.
Bhaskar, R. ( 1991) Philosophy and the Idea of Freedom. Oxford: Blackwell.
10.
Bouchikhi, H. ( 1998) ‘Living With and Building On Complexity: A Constructivist Perspective on Organizations’, Organization5: 217-32.
11.
Brentano, F. ( 1975) On the Several Senses of Being in Aristotle. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
12.
Buchanan, E. ( 1962) Aristotle’s Theory of Being. Cambridge, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
13.
Chia, R. ( 1996) Organizational Analysis as Deconstructive Practice. Berlin: de Gruyter.
14.
Chia, R. ( 1999) ‘A "Rhizomic" Model of Organizational Change and Transformation: Perspective from a Metaphysics of Change’, British Journal of Management10: 209-27.
15.
Chia, R. and King, I. ( 1998) ‘The Organizational Structuring of Novelty’ , Organization5(4): 461-78.
16.
Christian, W. ( 1959) An Interpretation of Whitehead’s Metaphysics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
Clegg, S., Kornberger, M. and Rhodes, C. ( 2005) ‘Learning/Becoming/Organizing’, Organization12(2): 147-67.
18.
Cooper, R. ( 2007) ‘Organs of Process: Rethinking Human Organization’ , Organization Studies28(10): 1547-73.
19.
de Rond, M. and Bouchikhi, H. ( 2004) ‘On the Dialectics of Strategic Alliances’ , Organization Science15(1): 56-69.
20.
de Vries, J. ( 1983) Grundbegriffe der Scholastik. Darmstadt : Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
21.
Drazin, R. and Sandelands, L. ( 1992) ‘Autogenesis: A Perspective on the Process of Organizing’ , Organization Science3(2): 230-49.
22.
Ford, L. ( 1998) ‘Structural Affinities between Kant and Whitehead’ , International Philosophical Quarterly38(3): 233-44.
23.
Greenwood, R. and Hinings, C.R. ( 1996) ‘Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism’, Academy of Management Review21(4): 1022-54.
24.
Halfwassen, J., Wald, B., Arndt, H.W., Trappe, T. and Schantz, R. ( 1998) ‘Substanz; Substanz/Akzidens’, in J. Ritter and K. Gründer (eds) Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, pp. 495-553. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
25.
Hammerschmidt, W. ( 1984) ‘The Problem of Time’, in H. Holz and E. Wolf-Gazo (eds) Whitehead und der Prozeßbegriff, pp. 154-60. Freiburg/München : Karl Alber.
26.
Hargrave, T. and van de Ven, A. ( 2006) ‘A Collective Action Model of Institutional Innovation’ , Academy of Management Review31(4): 864-88.
27.
Heidegger, M. ( 1977) Sein und Zeit. Frankfurt/Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
28.
Heidegger, M. ( 2004) ‘Vom Wesen und Begriff der "physis". Aristoteles, Physik B, 1’, in M. Heidegger (ed.) Gesamtausgabe. Frankfurt/Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
29.
Hernes, T. ( 2008) Understanding Organization as Process. Theory for a Tangled World. Abingdon: Routledge.
30.
Hernes, T. and Weik, E. ( 2007) ‘Organization as Process: Drawing the Line Between Endogeneous and Exogeneous Views’, Scandinavian Journal of Management23(3): 251-64.
31.
Hoffmann, F., Trappe, T., Halbfass, W., Grünewald, M. and Abel, G. ( 1992) ‘Realismus’, in J. Ritter and K. Gründer (eds) Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, pp.148-78. Darmstadt : Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
32.
Leclerc, I. ( 1993) ‘Form and Actuality’, in I. Leclerc (ed.) The Relevance of Whitehead , pp. 147-89. Bristol: Free Press.
33.
Linstead, S. and Thanem, T. ( 2007) ‘Multiplicity, Virtuality and Organization: The Contribution of Gilles Deleuze’, Organization Studies28(10): 1483-501.
34.
Meikle, S. ( 1985) Essentialism in the Thought of Karl Marx. London: Duckworth.
35.
Nayak, A. ( 2008) ‘On the Way to Theory: A Processual Approach’ , Organization Studies29(2): 173-90.
36.
Norrie, A. ( 2010) Dialectic and Difference. Abingdon : Routledge.
37.
Pöltner, G. ( 2001) ‘Sein als Gewordensein-Sein als Ereignis’ , in E. Jain and S. Grätzel (eds) Sein und Werden im Lichte Platons. Freiburg: Karl Alber.
38.
Rescher, N. ( 1996) Process Metaphysics. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
39.
Robinson, H. ( 2009) ‘Substance’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy .
40.
Sachs, J. ( 2001) ‘Aristotle: Metaphysics’, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
41.
Sandelands, L. and Drazin, R. ( 1989) ‘On the Language of Organization Theory’, Organization Studies10(4): 457-78.
42.
Shotter, J. ( 2006) ‘Understanding Process From Within: An Argument fo "Withness"-Thinking’, Organization Studies27(4): 585-604.
43.
Suppes, P. ( 1974) ‘Aristotle’s Concept of Matter and its Relation to Modern Concepts of Matter’, Synthese28: 27-50.
44.
The New Encyclopedia Britannica (1993) ‘Scylla and Charybdis’, The New Encyclopedia Britannica , vol. 10, p. 576.
45.
Thompson, G. ( 1982) ‘The Firm as "Dispersed" Social Agency’, Economy and Society11(3): 233-50.
46.
Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. ( 2002) ‘On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change’, Organization Science13(5): 567-82.
47.
van de Ven, A. and Poole, M. ( 1995) ‘Explaining Development and Change in Organizations’ , Academy of Management Review20(3): 510-40.
48.
van de Ven, A. and Poole, M. ( 2005) ‘Alternative Approaches for Studying Organizational Change’, Organization Studies26(9): 1377-404.
49.
Weick, K. ( 1969) The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
50.
Weick, K. and Quinn, R. ( 1999) ‘Organizational Change and Development’, Annual Review of Psychology50: 361-86.
51.
Whitehead, A.N. ( 1985) Process and Reality. New York, NY: Free Press.
52.
Wolf, U. ( 1984) ‘Ontologie’, in J. Ritter and K. Gründer (eds) Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, pp. 1199-200. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
53.
Wood, M. ( 2002) ‘Mind the Gap? A Processual Reconsideration of Organizational Knowledge’, Organization9(1): 151-71.
