From the Search for Universal Correlations to the Institutional Structuring of Economic Organization and Change: The Development and Future of Organization Studies
Free accessOtherFirst published online August, 2003
From the Search for Universal Correlations to the Institutional Structuring of Economic Organization and Change: The Development and Future of Organization Studies
Organization studies became institutionalized as a distinct research field in North America in the 1960s as leading universities expanded to include the new behavioural and management sciences. In keeping with the prevailing image of science, it adopted an empiricist epistemology and an atomistic ontology that portrayed formal organizations as isolated, reactive hierarchies adapting to market selection mechanisms. The further expansion of higher education in North America and Europe in the 1970s and 1980s, especially in business and management studies, together with the failure of the logical empiricist research programme in the Anglo-Saxon philosophy of science and the decline of Fordism, encouraged considerable fragmentation of organization studies around rival frameworks. Additionally, the success of East Asian firms in many international markets and continued divergence of many European forms of capitalism from the US norm led to increasing interest in the role of institutional frameworks in structuring and reproducing competing forms of economic organization. This involved a radical reconceptualization of both the nature of formal organizations and their environments, which complemented developments in evolutionary and institutional economics. As a result, organizations have come to be seen as key mediating collectivities between national and international political-economic institutions and economic outcomes in different kinds of market economy.
References
1.
Ackroyd, Stephen (1992) `Paradigms Lost: Paradise Regained?', in M. Reed and M. Hughes (eds) Rethinking Organization: New Directions in Organization Theory and Analysis, pp. 102-119. London: Sage .
2.
Aldrich, Howard (1992) `Incommensurable Paradigms? Vital Signs from Three Perspectives', in M. Reed and M. Hughes (eds) Rethinking Organization: New Directions in Organization Theory and Analysis, pp. 17-45. London: Sage .
3.
Amable, Bruno (2001) `Institutional Complementarity and Diversity of Social Systems of Innovation and Production' , Review of International Political Economy7: 645-687 .
Archer, Margaret S. (1995) Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
6.
Boyer, Robert and Saillard, Yves, eds (2002) Regulation Theory: The State of the Art. London: Routledge .
7.
Burrell, Gibson and Morgan, Gareth (1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London: Heinemann .
8.
Callon, Michel and Vignolle, J. P. (1977) `Breaking Down the Organization: Local Conflicts and Societal Systems of Action' , Social Science Information16: 147-167 .
9.
Carman, James M. (1980) `Paradigms for Marketing Theory' , Research in Marketing3: 1-36 .
10.
Casper, Steven (2000) `Institutional Adaptiveness, Technology Policy, and the Diffusion of New Business Models: The Case of German Biotechnology' , Organization Studies21: 887-914 .
11.
Casper, Steven and Glimstedt, Henrik (2001) `Economic Organization, Innovation Systems, and the Internet' , Oxford Review of Economic Policy17: 265-281 .
12.
Casper, Steven and Whitley, Richard (2002) `Managing Competences in Entrepreneurial Technology Firms: A Comparative Institutional Analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK' , presented to the Takeda Foundation Symposium on Engineering Intellect and Knowledge, SCASSS, Uppsala, June.
13.
Child, John (1972) `Organization Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice' , Sociology6: 1-22 .
14.
Crouch, Colin and Streeck, Wolfgang, eds (1997) Political Economy of Capitalism. London: Sage .
15.
Crouch, Colin, Le Gales, Patrick, Trigilia, Carlo and Voelzkow, Helmut (2001) Local Production Systems in Europe: Rise or Demise? Oxford: Oxford University Press .
16.
Edquist, Charles, ed. (1997) Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter .
17.
Engwall, Lars (1995) `Management Studies: A Fragmented Adhocracy?' , Scandinavian Journal of Management12: 225-235 .
18.
Engwall, Lars and Zamagni, Vera, eds (1998) Management Education in Historical Perspective. Manchester: Manchester University Press .
19.
Grant, Robert M. (2001) `Knowledge and Organization', in I. Nonaka and D. Teece (eds) Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utilization, pp. 145-169. London: Sage .
20.
Guillen, Mauro, Collins, Randall, England, Paula and Meyer, Marshall, eds (2002) The New Economic Sociology: Developments in An Emerging Field. New York: Russell Sage Foundation .
21.
Hall, Peter and Soskice, David, eds (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
22.
Hamilton, Gary and Feenstra, Robert C. (1997) `Varieties of Hierarchies and Markets: An Introduction', in Marco Orru, Nicole Woolsey Biggart and Gary Hamilton (eds) The Economic Organization of East Asian Capitalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
23.
Harre, Rom (1979) Social Being: A Theory for Social Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell .
24.
Hart, Jeffrey A. (1992) Rival Capitalists: International Competitiveness in the United States, Japan, and Western Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press .
25.
Held, David, McGraw, Anthony, Goldblatt, David and Perraton, Jonathan (1999) Global Transformations. Cambridge: Polity Press .
26.
Hickson, David, Macmillan, Charles, Azumi, Koya and Horvath, Dezso (1979) `Grounds for Comparative Organization Theory: Quicksands or Hard Core?', in C. J. Lammers and D. J. Hickson (eds) Organizations Alike and Unlike: International and Inter-institutional Studies in the Sociology of Organizations, pp. 25-41. London: Routledge .
27.
Hirst, Paul and Thompson, Grahame (1996) Globalisation in Question. Cambridge: Polity Press .
28.
Hollingsworth, J. Rogers (1991) `The Logic of Coordinating American Manufacturing Sectors', in J. L. Campbell, J. R. Hollingsworth and L. Lindbergh (eds) Governance of the American Economy, pp. 35-73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
29.
Hollingsworth, J. Rogers and Boyer, Robert, eds (1997) Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
30.
Hollingsworth, J. Rogers and Streeck, Wolfgang (1994) `Counties and Sectors: Concluding Remarks on Performance, Convergence and Competitiveness', in J. Rogers Hollingsworthet al. (eds) Governing Capitalist Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
31.
Imai, Ken-ichi and Itami, Hiroyuki (1984) `Interpenetration of Organization and Market: Japan's Firm and Market in Comparison with the US' , International Journal of Industrial Organization2: 285-310 .
32.
Jonsson, Sten (2003) `Publishing Exotic Studies in a Mainstreaming World', in B. Czarniawska and G. Sevon (eds) The Northern Lights: Organization Theory in Scandinavia, pp. 383-394. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press .
33.
Katz, Daniel and Kahn, Robert (1966) The Social Psychology of Organization. New York: Wiley .
34.
Katzenstein, P. (1985) Small States in World Markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press .
35.
Kenney, Martin, ed. (2000) Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
36.
Knudsen, Christian (1999) `Pluralism, Scientific Progress and the Structure of Organization Science' , paper presented to the 15th EGOS Colloquium, University of Warwick, July.
37.
Kristensen, Peer Hull (1996) `On the Constitutions of Economic Actors in Denmark: Interacting Skill Containers and Project Coordinators', in Richard Whitley and Peer Hull Kristensen (eds) The Changing European Firm. London: Routledge .
38.
Kristensen, Peer Hull (1997) `National Systems of Governance and Managerial Strategies in the Evolution of Work Systems: Britain, Germany and Denmark Compared', in Richard Whitley and Peer Hull Kristensen (eds) Governance at Work: The Social Regulation of Economic Relations in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
39.
Kuhn, Thomas (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
40.
Lakatos, Imre (1970) `Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes', in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, pp. 91-195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
41.
Lakatos, Imre (1971) `History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions', in R. S. Cohen and R. Buck (eds) Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, VIII, pp. 91-136. Dordrecht: Reidel .
42.
Langlois, Richard N. and Robertson, Paul (1995) Firms, Markets and Economic Change. London: Routledge .
43.
Lazonick, W. and O'Sullivan, Mary (1996) `Organization, Finance and International Competition' , Industrial Corporate Change5: 1-49 .
44.
Lazonick, William and O'Sullivan, Mary (1997) `Finance and Industrial Development, Part 1: The United States and the United Kingdom' , Financial History Review4: 7-29 .
45.
Loasby, Brian (1999) Knowledge, Institutions and Evolution in Economics. London: Routledge .
46.
Locke, Robert (1989) Management and Higher Education since 1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
47.
Locke, Robert (1996) The Collapse of the American Management Mystique. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
48.
Lundvall, B.-A. (1992) `Introduction', in B.-A. Lundvall (ed.) National Systems of Innovation. London: Pinter .
49.
March, James and Herbert, Simon (1958) Organizations, New York: Wiley .
50.
Maurice, Marc (1979) `For a Study of `the Societal Effect': Universality and Specificity in Organization Research', in C. J. Lammers and D. J. Hickson (eds) Organizations Alike and Unlike, pp. 42-60. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul .
51.
Maurice, Marc (2000) `The Paradoxes of Societal Analysis: A Review of the Past and Prospects for the Future', in Marc Maurice and Arndt Sorge (eds) Embedding Organizations: Societal Analysis of Actors, Organizations and Socioeconomic Contexts, pp. 13-36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
52.
Nelson, Richard, ed. (1993) National Innovation Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
53.
Noorderhaven, Niels (2000) `Positivist, Hermeneutical and Postmodern Positions in the Comparative Management Debate', in M. Maurice and A. Sorge (eds) Embedding Organizations, pp. 117-137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
54.
Perrow, Charles (1972) Complex Organizations. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman .
55.
Perry, Nick (1992) `Putting Theory in its Place: The Social Organization of Organizational Theorizing', in M. Reed and M. Hughes (eds) Rethinking Organization, pp. 85-101. London: Sage .
56.
Pfeffer, J. (1993) `Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science' , Academy of Management Review18: 599-620 .
57.
Piore, Michael J. and Sabel, Charles (1984) The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic Books .
58.
Redding, S. G. (1990) The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism. Berlin: de Gruyter .
59.
Reed, Michael (1992) `Introduction', in M. Reed and M. Hughes (eds) Rethinking Organization, pp. 1-16. London: Sage .
60.
Richardson, George (1972) `The Organization of Industry' , Economic Journal82: 883-896 .
61.
Sayer, Andrew (1992) Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. London: Routledge .
62.
Saxenian, Annalee (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
63.
Scott, Richard (1987) Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems, 2nd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall .
64.
Scott, Richard (1995) Institutions and Organizations. London: Sage .
65.
Silverman, David (1970) The Theory of Organizations. London: Heinemann .
66.
Sorge, Arndt (1991) `Strategic Fit and the Social Effect: Interpreting Cross-National Comparisons of Technology, Organization and Human Resources' , Organization Studies12: 161-190 .
67.
Sorge, Arndt (2000) `The Diabolical Dialectics of Societal Effects', in M. Maurice and A. Sorge (eds) Embedding Organizations, pp. 37-56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
68.
Soskice, David (1997) `German Technology Policy, Innovation and National Institutional Frameworks' , Industry and Innovation4: 75-96 .
69.
Soskice, David (1999) `Divergent Production Regimes: Coordinated and Uncoordinated Market Economies in the 1980s and 1990s', in Herbert Kitschelt, Peter Lange, Gary Marks and John Stephens (eds) Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, pp. 101-134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
70.
Stinchcombe, Arthur (1965) `Social Structure and Organizations', in James March (ed.) Handbook of Organizations, pp. 142-193. Chicago: Rand McNally .
71.
Streeck, Wolfgang and Schmitter, Philippe, eds (1985) Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State. London: Sage .
72.
Teece, David (2001) `Strategies for Managing Knowledge Assets: The Role of Firm Structure and Industrial Context', in I. Nonaka and D. Teece (eds) Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utilization, pp. 125-144. London: Sage .
73.
Teece, David and Pisano, Gary (1994) `The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction' , Industrial and Corporate Change3: 537-556 .
74.
Tsoukas, Hari (1989) `The Validity of Ideographic Research Explanations' , Academy of Management Review14: 551-561 .
75.
Westney, Eleanor (1996) `The Japanese Business System: Key Features and Prospects for Changes' , Journal of Asian Business12: 21-50 .
76.
Whitley, Richard (1984) `The Fragmented State of Management Studies: Reasons and Consequences' , Journal of Management Studies21(3): 331-348 .
77.
Whitley, Richard (1992) Business Systems in East Asia: Firms, Markets and Societies. London: Sage .
78.
Whitley, Richard (1999a) Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
79.
Whitley, Richard (1999b) `Competing Logics and Units of Analysis in the Comparative Study of Economic Organization: The Comparative Business Systems Framework in Perspective' , International Studies of Management and Organization, Special Issue on Business Systems: Critical Perspectives, 29: 113-126 .
80.
Whitley, Richard (2000a) `Introduction: Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century', in R. Whitley, The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
81.
Whitley, Richard (2000b) `The Institutional Structuring of Innovation Strategies: Business Systems, Firm Types and Patterns of Technical Change in Different Market Economies' , Organization Studies21: 855-886 .
82.
Whitley, Richard (2001) `How and Why are International Firms Different?', in Glenn Morgan, Peer Hull Kristensen and Richard Whitley (eds) The Multinational Firm, pp. 27-68. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
83.
Whitley, Richard (2003a) `The Institutional Structuring of Organizational Capabilities: The Role of Authority Sharing and Organizational Careers' , Organization Studies24(5): 667-695 .
84.
Whitley, Richard (2003b) `Competition and Pluralism in the Public Sciences: The Impact of Institutional Frameworks on the Organization of Academic Science' , Research Policy32(6): 1015-1029 .
