Recent debates on the production of knowledge in organizational analysis are interpreted from a largely postmodernist, `sociology of consumption' perspective. Drawing upon the work of Jean-François Lyotard, Michel de Certeau and Stanley Deetz in particular, the analysis rejects both positivist and conventionalist theses on knowledge production in favour of a deconstructionist approach that embraces acts of production and consumption in a reflexive way. The argument is developed by way of a case study of production and consumption in organizational analysis. Through an assessment of scientific status and institutional control-centrally in relation to the `paradigm incommensurability' debate-a taxonomy of styles of knowledge production and consumption is proposed. Five main `camps' comprise this taxonomy-non-consumers, integrationists, protectionists, pluralists and postmodernists. We describe the basic knowledge philosophies of the camps and subject them to evaluation and critique. This analysis sees, inter alia, Jeffrey Pfeffer's proposals for producing an integrated knowledge paradigm for organizational analysis—the so-called `Pfefferdigm' thesis-confounded by the indeterminate rationalities and networks of signification of postmodern analysis. For explaining processes of knowledge production and consumption, it is argued ultimately that the notion of `discourse' should replace that of `paradigm'.
Astley, W.G. and Zammuto, R.F. (1992) `Organization Science, Managers and Language Games', Organization Science3(4): 443-460.
3.
Bauman, Z. (1998) Work, Consumerism and the New Poor. Buckingham: Open University Press.
4.
Best, S. and Kellner, D. (1991) Postmodern Theory. New York: The Guilford Press.
5.
Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
Bourdieu, P. (1993) The Field of Cultural Production. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
Burrell, G. (1996) `Normal Science, Paradigms, Metaphors, Discourses and Genealogies of Analysis', in S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy and W.R. Nord (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies, pp. 31-56. London: Sage.
8.
Burrell, G. and Morgan, M. (1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London: Heinemann.
9.
Calás, M.B. and Smircich, L. (1999) `Past Postmodernism? Reflections and Tentative Directions', Academy of Management Review24(4): 649-671.
10.
Casey, C. (1995) Work, Self and Society: After Industrialism. London: Routledge.
11.
Clegg, S. (1990) Modern Organizations: Organization Studies in the Postmodern World. London: Sage.
12.
Cole, S. (1983) `The Hierarchy of Sciences', American Journal of Sociology89: 111-139.
13.
Cooper, R. (1983) `The Other: A Model of Human Structuring', in G. Morgan (ed.) Beyond Method. London: Sage.
14.
de Certeau, M. (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
15.
Deetz, S. (1996) `Describing Differences in Approaches to Organization Science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and Their Legacy', Organization Science7(2): 191-207.
16.
Donaldson, L. (1985) In Defence of Organization Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Donaldson, L. (1996) For Positivist Organization Theory: Proving the Hard Core. London: Sage
18.
Donaldson, L. (1998) `The Myth of Paradigm Incommensurability in Management Studies: Comments by an Integrationist', Organization5(2): 267-272.
19.
Edgell, S. , Hetherington, K. and Warde, A. (1996) Consumption Matters. Oxford: Blackwell/The Sociological Review.
20.
Fairclough, N. (1996) Language and Power. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
21.
Feyerabend, P. (1975) Against Method. London: New Left Books.
22.
Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
23.
Friedrichs, R. (1970) A Sociology of Sociology. New York: Free Press.
24.
Gherardi, S. and Nicolini, D. (2000) `To Transfer is to Transform: The Circulation of Safety Knowledge', Organization7(2): 329-348.
25.
Gioia, D. and Pitre, E. (1989) `Multi-paradigm Perspectives on Theory Building', Academy of Management Review5(4): 584-602.
26.
Gouldner, A. (1970) The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. London: Heinemann.
27.
Grint, K. (1991) The Sociology of Work: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28.
Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1994) `Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research', in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
29.
Harvey, D. (1990) The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
30.
Hassard, J. (1985) `Multiple Paradigms and Organizational Research: An Analysis of Work Behaviour in the Fire Service', unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Aston, UK.
31.
Hassard, J. (1988) `Overcoming Hermeticism in Organization Theory: An Alternative to Paradigm Incommensurability', Human Relations41(3): 247-259.
32.
Hassard, J. (1991) `Multiple Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: A Case Study', Organization Studies12(2): 279-299.
33.
Hassard, J. (1993) Sociology and Organization Theory: Positivism, Paradigms and Postmodernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Hassard, J. and Parker, M. (1993) Postmodernism and Organizations. London: Sage.
35.
Jackson, N. and Carter, P. (1991) `In Defence of Paradigm Commensurability', Organization Studies12(1): 109-127.
36.
Kilduff, M. and Mehra, A. (1997) `Postmodernism and Organisational Research', Academy of Management Review22(2): 453-481.
37.
Knights, D. (1997) `Organization Theory in the Age of Deconstruction: Dualism, Gender and Postmodernism Revisited', Organization Studies18(1): 1-19.
38.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962/1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
39.
Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A., eds (1970) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Law, J. (1987) `Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of Portuguese Expansion', in W. Bijker, T. Hughes and T. Pinch (eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.
Lewis, M.W. and Grimes, A.J. (1999) `Metatriangulation: Building Theory from Multiple Paradigms', Academy of Management Review24(4): 672-690.
42.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984/1997) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
43.
McKinley, W. (1995) `Commentary: Towards a Reconciliation of the Theory-Pluralism in Strategic Management-Incommensurability and the Constructivist Approach of the Erlangen School', Advances in Strategic Management12A: 249-260.
44.
McKinley, W. and Mone, M.A. (1998) `The Re-construction of Organization Studies: Wrestling with Incommensurability', Organization5(2): 169-189.
45.
McKinley, W. , Mone, M.A. and Moon, G. (1999) `Determinants and Development of Schools in Organization Theory', Academy of Management Review24(4): 634-648.
46.
Mauws, M.K. and Phillips, N. (1995) `Understanding Language Games', Organization Science6(3): 322-334.
47.
Munro, R. (1999) `After Knowledge: The Language of Information', in S. Linstead and R. Westwood (eds) The Language of Organization. London: Sage.
48.
Nietzsche, F. (1911/1974) `Homer's Contest', in M. Mugge Complete Works. New York: Gordon Press.
49.
Pfeffer, J. (1993) `Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable', Academy of Management Review18(4): 599-620.
50.
Pfeffer, J. (1997) `Mortality, Reproducibility, and the Persistence of Styles of Theory', Organization Science6(4): 681-686.
51.
Phillips, D. (1977) Wittgenstein and Scientific Knowledge. London: Macmillan.
52.
Piore, M.J. and Sabel, C.F. (1984) The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.
53.
Reed, M. (1985) Redirections in Organizational Analysis. London: Tavistock.
54.
Reed, M. (1992) The Sociology of Organizations: Themes, Perspectives and Prospects. New York: Harvester Weatsheaf.
55.
Reed, M. (1996) `Organizational Theorising: A Historical Contested Terrain', in S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy and W.R. Nord (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies, pp: 31-56. London: Sage.
56.
Rosenau, P.M. (1992) Post-modernism and the Social Sciences: Insights, Inroads and Intrusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
Rorty, R. (1985) `Texts and Lumps', New Literary History17: 1-15.
58.
Scherer, A.G. and Dowling, M.J. (1995) `Towards a Reconciliation of the Theory-Pluralism in Strategic Management-Incommensurability and the Constructivist Approach of the Erlangen School', Advances in Strategic Management12A: 195-247.
59.
Scherer, A.G. (1998) `Pluralism and Incommensurability in Strategic Management and Organization Theory: A Problem in Search of a Solution', Organization5(2): 147-169.
60.
Schultz, M. and Hatch, M.J. (1996) `Living with Multiple Paradigms: The Case of Paradigm Interplay in Organization Culture Studies', Academy of Management Review1(2): 529-557.
61.
Shapere, D. (1971) `The Paradigm Concept', Science17: 706-709.
62.
Silverman, D. (1969) `Correspondence: Organization: A Rejoinder', Sociology3(3): 420-421.
63.
Weaver, G.R. and Gioia, D.A. (1994) `Paradigms Lost: Incommensurability vs. Structurationist Inquiry', Organization Studies15(4): 565-590.
64.
White, R.F. and Jaques, R. (1995) `Operationalizing the Postmodernity Construct for Efficient Organizational Change Management', Journal of Organizational Change Management8(2): 45-71.
65.
Wicks, A.C. and Freeman, R.E. (1998) `Organization Studies and the New Pragmatism: Positivism, Anti-positivism and the Search for Ethics', Organization Science9(2): 123-140.
66.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
