This paper reports on our local initiative in an ongoing participatory action research (PAR) project with three academic communities in Helsinki. The project offers an opportunity to reflect on the nature of collaborative strategies in the context of university reforms. We critically examine PAR as an ideal and as a practice, and elaborate on its promises and uncertainties.
Becher, T. (1989) Academic Tribes and Territories. Milton Keynes: The Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University Press.
2.
Brubaker, R. and Cooper, F. (2000) ‘Beyond “Identity”’, Theory and Society29(1): 1-47.
3.
Buhanist, P. , Kasvio, A. and Kauppinen, T. (1994) ‘Finnish Action Research’, in T. Kauppinen and M. Lahtonen Action Research in Finland, pp. 15-41. Labour Policy Studies 82. Helsinki: Ministry of Labour.
4.
Chandler, J. , Barry, J. and Clark, H. (2000) ‘Managing Academic Identities’. Paper presented to the 16th EGOS Colloquium, sub-theme ‘Academics at Work’, Helsinki, 2-4 July.
5.
Czarniawska, B. (1997) ‘Organizing in the Institutional Quicksands’. Keynote presentation to the 13th EGOS Colloquium, ‘Organizational Responses to Radical Environmental Changes’, Budapest, 3-5 July.
6.
Dachler, P.H. (1999) ‘Power and Politics as Ethical Issues in Methodology’, Organization Studies20(2): 341-345.
7.
Elden M. and Chisholm, R. (1993) ‘Emerging Varieties of Action Research: Introduction to Special Issue, Human Relations46(2): 121-143.
8.
Engeström, Y. (1987) Learning by Expanding: An Activity Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
9.
Fals-Borda, O. and Rahman, M.A. (1991) Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action Research. New York: Intermediate Technology Publications, Apex Press.
10.
Ferguson, P.B. (1998) ‘Emancipating Practices: How/Can Our Research be Oppressive?’ Paper presented to the New Zealand Action Research Network Conference, Wellington Polytechnic, July.
11.
Ferguson, P.B. (1999) Developing a Research Culture in a Polytechnic: An Action Research Case Study. The University of Waikato, PhD thesis. [http://www.twp.ac.nz/research/resource.htm]
12.
Foucault, M. (1980) ‘Truth and Power’, in C. Gordon (ed.) Power/Knowledge, pp. 109-133. New York: Pantheon.
13.
Freire, P. (1972) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
14.
Gatenby, B. and Humphries, B. (2000) ‘Feminist Participatory Action Research: Methodological and Ethical Issues’, Women’s Studies International Forum23(1): 89-105.
15.
Goffman, E. (1961) Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Garden City, NY:Doubleday.
16.
Gustavsen, B. (1992) Dialogue and Development: Theory of Communication, Action Research and the Restructuring of Working Life. Assen: Van Gorcum.
17.
Hearn, J. (1998) ‘Theorizing Men and Men’s Theorizing: Varieties of Discursive Practices in Men’s Theorizing of Men’, Theory and Society27: 781-816.
18.
Heikkinen, H.L.T and Moilanen, P., eds (1999) Siinä tutkija missä tekijä. Jyväskylä: PS-viestintä.
19.
Humphries, B. (1997) ‘From Critical Thought to Emancipatory Action: Contradictory Research Goals?’Sociological Research Online2(1). [http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/1/3.html]
20.
Häyrinen-Alestalo, M. (1999) ‘The University under the Pressure of Innovation Policy. Reflecting on European and Finnish Experiences’, Science Studies12(1): 44-69.
21.
Jary, D. and Parker, M., eds (1998) The New Higher Education: Issues and Directions for the Post-Dearing University. Stoke-on-Trent: Staffordshire University Press.
22.
Kalleberg, R. (1995) ‘Action Research as Science and Profession in the Discipline of Sociology’, unpublished manuscript for S. Toulmin and B. Gustavsen (eds) Beyond Theory: Changing Organizations through Participatory Action Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
23.
Kasanen, E. , Lukka, K. and Siitonen, A. (1993) ‘The Constructive Approach in Management Accounting Research’, Journal of Management Accounting Research (Fall): 243-264.
24.
Katila, S. and Meriläinen, S. (1999) ‘A Serious Researcher or Just Another Nice Girl? Doing Gender in a Male-dominated Scientific Community’, Gender, Work and Organization6(3): 163-173.
25.
Kiianmaa, A. (1999) ‘Miten markkinatalous näkyy tieteessä?’Tiedepolitiikka1: 7-20.
26.
Kleinman, S. (1991) ‘Field-workers’ Feelings: What we Feel, Who we are, How we Analyze’, in W.B. Shaffir and R.A. Steppins (eds) Experiencing Fieldwork - An Inside View of Qualitative Research, pp. 184-267. London: Sage.
27.
Kuula, A. (1997) ‘Self-understanding of Action Research’, in T. Alasoini, M. Kyllönen and A. Kasvio (eds) Workplace Innovations, pp. 276-89. National Workplace Development Programme, Reports 3, Yearbook 1997. Helsinki: Ministry of Labor.
28.
Kuula, A. (1999) Toimintatutkimus. Tampere: Vastapaino.
29.
Lather, P. (1991) Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Postmodern. New York: Routledge.
30.
Levin, M. and Greenwood, D. (2001) ‘Pragmatic Action Research and the Struggle to Transform Universities into Learning Communities’, in P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds) Handbook of Action Research, pp. 103-113. London: Sage.
31.
Lofland, J. (1976) Doing Social Life. New York: Wiley.
32.
Ludema, J.D. , Wilmot, T.B. and Srivastva, S. (1997) ‘Organizational Hope: Reaffirming the Constructive Task of Social and Organizational Inquiry’, Human Relations50(8): 1015-1051.
33.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
34.
Maguire, P. (2001) ‘Uneven Ground: Feminisms and Action Research’, in P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds) Handbook of Action Research, pp. 59-69. London: Sage.
35.
Meyerson, D.E. (1991) ‘Acknowledging and Uncovering Ambiguities in Cultures’, in P.J. Frostet al. (eds) Reframing Organizational Culture, pp. 254-270. London: Sage.
36.
Meyerson, D.E. (2000) ‘If Emotions were Honoured: A Cultural Analysis’, in S. Fineman (ed.) Emotions in Organizations (2nd edn), pp. 167-183. London: Sage.
37.
Meyerson, D.E. and Scully, M.A. (1995) ‘Tempered Radicalism and the Politics of Ambivalence and Change’, Organization Science6(5): 585-600.
38.
Morgan, G. (1993) Imaginization: The Art of Creative Management. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
Mäntylä, H. (2000) ‘Akateeminen työ yliopistoyksiköissä: kolmen yksikön kuvausta ja vertailua’. Mimeo, Department of Management, Helsinki School of Economics, April.
40.
Mäntylä, H. and Räsänen, K. (1996) ‘Kurssi “Organisaation uudistaminen”: raportti uuden opintojakson kehittämisestä ja toteuttamisesta HKKK: ssa 1995 ja 1996’. Mimeo, Department of Management, Helsinki School of Economics, December.
41.
Readings, B (1996) The University in Ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Reason, P. (1996) ‘Reflections on the Purposes of Human Inquiry’, Qualitative Inquiry2(1): 15-28.
43.
Reason, P. and Heron, J. (1995) ‘Co-operative Inquiry”, in J.A. Smith, R. Harre and L. Van Langhove (eds) Rethinking Methods in Psychology, pp. 122-142. London: Sage.
44.
Räsänen, K. (1996) ‘Reflections in the Light of a Campfire: Business School Academics and the Real Life of Greening’, in S. Kivisaari and R. Lovio (eds) Bright Ideas? Environmental Management in Finnish Perspectives, pp. 221-234. Helsinki: Helsinki School of Economics Publications B-164.
45.
Räsänen, K. (1998a) ‘Learning and Natural Disasters in Academic Context: Normal Reactions to Non-normal Conditions’. Paper presented to the 14th EGOS Colloquium, Maastricht, 9-11 July.
46.
Räsänen, K. (1998b) ‘Akateeminen vapaus, in K. Lilja (ed.) Tainion majakka. Havaintoja Riston signaaleista tutkijayhteisölle, pp. 83-90. Helsinki: Helsinki School of Economics Publications.
47.
Räsänen, K. (1998c) ‘Miten suhtautua BPR-otteeseen korkeakoulun kehittämisessä’, in M. Mälkiä and J. Vakkuri (eds) Strateginen johtaminen yliopistoissa, pp. 269-305. Tampere: University of Tampere, TAJU.
48.
Räsänen, K. and Mäntylä, H. (1999) ‘Academic Work Activities and Possible Integrative Identities in Three Different Disciplinary Communities’. Paper presented to the workshop ‘Ideals and Practices of University Research’, University of Tampere, 16-17 April.
49.
Tiittula, P. and Mäntylä, H. (1999) ‘Miten uudistua? Kehittämissyklien tunnistaminen HKKK: n opetuksessa’. Mimeo, Department of Management, Helsinki School of Economics, January.
50.
Wadsworth, Y. (1998) ‘What is Participatory Action Research?’Action Research International, Paper 2. [http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/sawd/ari/ari-wadsworth.html]
51.
Wager, M. (1999) ‘Tutkijuus ja tunteet’, in S. Näre (ed.) Tunteiden sosiologiaa: II Historiaa ja säätelyä, pp. 325-342. Tampere: SKS.
52.
Wager, M. (2000) ‘Research Practices and Relationships: Emotions and Identity in Academic Work’. Paper presented to the 16th EGOS Colloquium, sub-theme ‘Academics at Work’, Helsinki, 2-4 July.
53.
Weil, S. (1999) ‘Re-creating Universities for beyond the Stable State: From “Dearingesque” Systemic Control to Post-Dearing Systemic Learning and Inquiry’, Systems Research and Behavioral Sciences16: 171-190.
54.
Whitehead, J. (1989) ‘Creating a Living Educational Theory from Questions of the Kind “How do I improve my practice?”’, Cambridge Journal of Education19(1): 41-52.
55.
Whitley, R. (1984) The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
