This paper presents the design and results of an empirical study on organizational learning (OL). OL is conceptualized as a communication based process, changing organizationally shared reality constructions. A model is developed, which allows the description of organizations as learning systems. It serves as a frame for collecting and structuring data on reality constructions and communication relations. Gathered by interviews in two municipal administrations, data is further processed into cognitive maps (reality constructions) and networks (communication relations). Their analysis leads to propositions about the nature of OL processes. It is demonstrated that changes of organizationally shared reality constructions (OL) originate in self-organizing communication networks. Furthermore, a structural and a strategic organizational learning mode are distinguished. They differ with respect to the information which is processed in the networks, the outcome they produce and the logic they follow.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldrich, H. and Whetten, D. A. (1981) `Organization-Sets, Action-Sets and Networks: Making the Most of Simplicity', in P. C. Nystrom and W. H. Starbuck (eds) Handbook of Organizational Design, Volume 1, pp. 385-408. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
Argyris, C. and Schön, D. (1978) Organizational Learning-A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
3.
Axelrod, R. (1976) `The Analysis of Cognitive Maps', in R. Axelrod (ed.) Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites, pp. 55-73. Princeton, NJ: University Press.
4.
Bateson, G. (1971) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine.
5.
Beer, M. (1980) Organization Change and Development: A Systems View. Santa Monica: Good-year.
6.
Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.
7.
Blackler, F. (1993) `Knowledge and the Theory of Organizations: Organizations as Activity Systems and the Reframing of Management', Journal of Management Studies30: 863-884.
8.
Bougon, M. G. , Weick, K. E. and Binkhorst, D. (1977) `Cognition in Organizations: An Analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra', Administrative Science Quarterly22: 606-639.
9.
Bower, G. H. and Hilgard, E. R. (1981) Theories of Learning, 5th edn.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10.
Chandler, A. D. (1962) Strategy and Structure. Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge: MIT Press.
11.
Daft, R. L. and Huber, G. (1987) `How Organizations Learn: A Communication Framework', Research in the Sociology of Organizations5: 1-36.
12.
De Geus, A. (1988) `Planning as Learning', Harvard Business Review2: 70-74.
13.
Dey, I. (1993) Qualitative Data Analysis. A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Routledge.
14.
Dodgson, M. (1993) `Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures', Organization Studies14: 375-394.
15.
Duncan, R. and Weiss, A. (1979) `Organizational Learning-Implications for Organizational Design', Research in Organizational Behavior1: 75-123.
16.
Eden, C. , Jones, S. and Sims, D. (1979) Thinking in Organizations. London: Macmillan.
17.
Eden, C. , Jones, S., Sims, D. and Smithin, T. (1983) Messing about in Problems. Oxford: Pergamon.
18.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) `Building Theories from Case Study Research', Academy of Management Review14: 532-550.
19.
Fiol, M. and Lyles, M. (1985) `Organizational Learning', Academy of Management Review10: 803-813.
20.
Ford, J. D. and Backoff, R. W. (1988) `Organizational Change in and out of Dualities and Paradox', in R. E. Quinn and K. S. Cameron (eds) Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management, pp. 81-121. Cambridge: Ballinger.
21.
Ford, J. D. and Ford, L. W. (1994) `Logics of Identity, Contradiction, and Attraction in Change', Academy of Management Review19: 756-785.
22.
Ford, J. D. and Ford, L. W. (1995) `The Role of Conversations in Producing Intentional Change in Organizations', Academy of Management Review20: 541-570.
23.
Forrester, J. (1972) `Understanding the Counterintuitive Behavior of Social Systems', in J. Beishon and G. Peters (eds) System Behavior, pp. 200-217. New York: Harper & Row.
24.
Freedman, D. H. (1992) `Is Management Still a Science?', Harvard Business Review6: 26-38.
25.
Friedlander, F. (1983) `Patterns of Individual and Organizational Learning', in S. Srivastva (ed.), The Executive Mind, pp. 192-200. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
Garvin, D. (1993) `Building a Learning Organization', Harvard Business Review4: 78-91.
27.
Hall, R. I. (1984) `The Natural Logic of Management Policy Making: Its Implications for the Survival of an Organization', Management Science30: 905-927.
28.
Hammer, M. and Stanton, S. A. (1995) The Reengineering Revolution. London: HarperCollins.
29.
Handy, C. (1989) The Age of Unreason. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
30.
Hartley, J. F. (1994) `Case Studies in Organizational Research', in C. Cassell and G. Symon (eds) Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, pp. 208-229. London: Sage.
31.
Hedberg, B. (1981) `How Organizations Learn and Unlearn', in P. Nystrom and W. Starbuck (eds) Handbook of Organizational Design, 1, pp. 3-27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
Hedberg, B. , Nystrom, P. and Starbuck, W. (1976) `Camping on Seesaws: Prescriptions for a Self-Designing Organization', Administrative Science Quarterly21: 41-65.
33.
Huff, A. (1990) Mapping Strategic Thought. Chichester: Wiley.
34.
Ibarra, H. and Andrews, S. B. (1993) `Power, Social Influence and Sense Making: Effects of Network Centrality and Proximity on Employee Perceptions', Administrative Science Quarterly38: 277-303.
35.
Ichazo, O. (1982) Between Metaphysics and Protoanalysis. New York: Arica Institute Press.
36.
Isaacs, W. (1993) `Taking Flight: Dialogue, Collective Thinking, and Organizational Learning', Organizational Dynamics3: 24-39.
37.
Jarillo, J. C. (1988) `On Strategic Networks', Strategic Management Journal9: 31-49.
38.
Kanter, R. M. (1983) The Change Masters: Innovations for Productivity in the American Corporation. New York: Simon & Schuster.
39.
Kanter, R. M. , Stein, B. and Jick, T. (1992) The Challenge of Organizational Change. New York: Free Press.
40.
Kilmann, R. H. and Covin, T. J. (1990) Corporate Transformation. Revitalizing Organizations for a Competitive World. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41.
Klimecki, R. , Probst, G.J. B. and Eberl, P. (1994) Entwicklungsorientiertes Management. Stuttgart: Schaeffer-Poeschel.
42.
Knoke, D. and Kuklinski, J. H. (1982) Network Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
43.
Kofman, K. and Senge, P. M. (1993) `Communities of Commitment: The Heart of Learning Organizations', Organizational Dynamics22: 5-23.
44.
Krackhardt, D. and Hanson, J. R. (1993) `Informal Networks: The Company Behind the Chart', Harvard Business Review4: 104-111.
45.
Langfield-Smith, K. (1992) `Exploring the Need for a Shared Cognitive Map', Journal of Management Studies29: 349-368.
46.
Laukkanen, M. (1994) `Comparative Cause Mapping of Organizational Cognitions', Organization Science5: 322-343.
47.
Lawrence, P. R. and Lorsch, J. W. (1967) Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
48.
Lee, S. , Courtney, J. and O'Keefe, R. (1992) `A System for Organizational Learning Using Cognitive Maps", OMEGA International Journal of Management Science1: 23-36.
49.
Lefrancois, G. R. (1982) Psychological Theory and Human Learning, 2nd edn.Monterey: Brooks/ Cole.
50.
Levinthal, D. A. and March, J. G. (1993) `The Myopia of Learning', Strategic Management Journal14: 95-112.
51.
Luhmann, N. (1986) `The Autopoiesis of Social Systems', in F. Geyer and J. van der Zouwen (eds) Sociocybernetic Paradoxes, pp. 172-192. London: Sage.
52.
Luhmann, N. (1990) Essays on Self-Reference. New York: Columbia University Press.
53.
Lyles, M. and Schwenk, C. (1992) `Top Management, Strategy and Organizational Knowledge Structures', Journal of Management Studies29: 155-174.
54.
March, J. G. (1991) `Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning', Organization Science2: 71-87.
55.
March J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1976) `Organizational Learning and the Ambiguity of the Past', in J. G. March and J. P. Olsen (eds) Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations, pp. 54-67. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.
56.
Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1987) The Tree of Knowledge. Boston, MA: Shambala.
57.
Manz, C. (1992) `Self-Leading Work Teams: Moving Beyond Self-Managing Myths', Human Relations45: 1119-1141.
58.
Mintzberg, H. (1994) The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. New York: Prentice-Hall.
59.
Mohrmann, S. A. and Mohrmann, A. M. (1993) `Organizational Change and Learning', in J. R. Galbraith and E. E. Lawler III (eds) Organizing for the Future: The New Logic for Managing Complex Organizations, pp. 87-108. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
60.
Nadler, D. A. (1990) `Organizational Frame Bending: Types of Change in the Complex Organization', in R. H. Kilmann and T. J. Covin (eds) Corporate Transformation. Revitalizing Organizations for a Competitive World, pp. 66-83. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
61.
Nadler, D. A. and Tushman, M. L. (1980) `A Model for Diagnosing Organizational Behavior', Organizational Dynamics9: 35-51.
62.
Nadler, D. A. and Tushman, M. L. (1986) Managing Strategic Organizational Change. New York: Wiley.
63.
Nanus, B. (1992) Visionary Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
64.
Pedler, M. , Boydell, T. and Burgoyne, J. (1989) `Towards the Learning Company', Management Education and Development20: 1-8.
65.
Powell, W. W. (1990) `Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization', Research in Organizational Behavior12: 295-336.
66.
Prahalad, C. K. and Bettis, R. A. (1986) `The Dominant Logic: A New Linkage Between Diversity and Performance', Strategic Management Journal7: 485-501.
67.
Rogers, E. M. and Kincaid, D. L. (1981) Communication Networks. Toward a New Paradigm for Research. New York: Free Press.
68.
Schein, E. (1993) `On Dialogue, Culture and Organizational Learning', Organizational Dynamics3: 40-51.
69.
Schwartz, H. and Jacobs, J. (1979) Qualitative Sociology: A Method to the Madness. New York: Free Press.
70.
Senge, P. (1990) The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of Learning Organizations. New York: Doubleday Currency.
71.
Shrivastava, P. (1983) `A Typology of Organizational Learning Systems', Journal of Management Studies1: 7-28.
72.
Simon, H. A. (1991) `Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning', Organization Science2: 125-134.
73.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
74.
Ulrich, H. and Probst, G. J. B. (eds) (1984) Self-Organization and Management of Social Systems. Heidelberg: Springer.
75.
von Foerster, H. (1984) `On Constructing a Reality', in P. Watzlawick (ed.) The Invented Reality, pp. 41-61. New York: Norton.
76.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1984) `An Introduction to Radical Constructivism', in P. Watzlawick (ed.) The Invented Reality, pp. 17-40. New York: Norton.
77.
von Glasersfeld, E. and Cobb, P. (1983) `Knowledge as Environmental Fit', Man-Environment Systems13: 216-224.
78.
von Krogh, G. , Roos, J. and Slocum, K. (1994) `An Essay on Corporate Epistemology', Strategic Management Journal15: 53-71.
79.
Walsh, J. P. and Ungson, G. R. (1991) `Organizational Memory', Academy of Management Review16: 57-91.
80.
Watzlawick, P. (ed.) (1984) The Invented Reality. New York: Norton.
81.
Weick, K. E. (1977) `Organization Design: Organizations as Self-Designing Systems', Organizational Dynamics6: 30-46.
82.
Weick, K. E. (1991) `The Nontraditional Quality of Organizational Learning', Organization Science2: 116-124.
83.
Weick, K. E. and Bougon, M. G. (1986) `Organizations as Cognitive Maps: Charting Ways to Success and Failure', in H. P. Sims and D. A. Gioia (eds) The Thinking Organization, pp. 102-135. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
84.
Wildavsky, A. B. (1988) Searching for Safety. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
85.
Wrightson, M. T. (1976) `The Documentary Coding Method', in R. Axelrod (ed.) Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites, pp. 291-332. Princeton, NJ: University Press.
