The purpose of this article is twofold. First, it deals with issues arising from the application of a model of learning to the Greek public administration system (GPAS). Second, it suggests a process of organizational self-learning capable of transforming a state bureaucracy into a self-referential organization. That is to say, a process of self-learning which considers the organization as a social entity rather than the individuals who are members of an organization, and which is based on a critical and repeating cycle of knowing, reflecting, understanding and deciding. In order to explain the applied model of learning in the GPAS and its deficiencies, the analysis adopts an institutional perspective of organizations. In accordance with this perspective, it is worth noting that, while the GPAS belongs to the political system, it connects its learning activities with the wider education system, using the codes and programs of this system. This is considered an important inhibitor to the introduction of a self-learning process which aims at the modernization of the GPAS. The concluding argument suggests a methodological approach in order to progressively transform the GPAS into a self-referential organization and to establish within it a self-learning process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ackoff, R. (1981) Creating the Corporate Future. New York: Wiley.
2.
Aldrich, H. (1978) `Centralization versus Decentralization in the Design of Human Service Delivery Systems: A Response to Gouldner's Lament', in R. C. Sarri and Y. Hasenfeld (eds) The Management of Human Services. New York: Columbia University Press.
3.
Alexander, J. (1988) Action and its Environment. New York: Columbia University Press.
4.
Alexander, J. and Colomy, P. (eds) (1989) Differentiation Theory: Problems and Prospects. New York: Columbia University Press.
5.
Arendt, H. (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Ashby, R. (1954) Design for a Brain. New York: Wiley.
7.
Bourdieu, P. (1991) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Brown, J-S. and Duguid, P. (1991) `Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Towards a Unified View of Working, Learning and Innovation', Organization Science2: 40-57.
9.
Checkland, P. (1981) Systems Thinking Systems Practice. Chichester: Wiley.
10.
Cohen J. (1991) `Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy', in A. Hamlin and P. Pettit (eds) The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State. Oxford: Blackwell.
11.
Crozier, M. (1964) The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
12.
Dertilis, G. (1977) Social Transformation and Military Intervention: 1880-1909. Athens: Exantas.
13.
Dodgson, M. (1993) `Organization Learning: A Review of Some Literatures', Organization Studies14(3): 375-394.
14.
Dosi, G. (1988) Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter.
15.
Espejo, R. (1993) `Domains of Interactions between a Social System and its Environment', in I. Tsivacou (ed.) A Challenge for Systems Thinking. Athens: University of the Aegean Press.
16.
Feldman, M. (1989) Order without Design: Information Production and Policy Making. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
17.
Gioia, D. A. and Poole, P. P. (1984) `Scripts in Organizational Behaviour', Academy of Management Review9: 449-459.
18.
Habermas, J. (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
19.
Habermas, J. (1993) Justification and Application. Cambridge: Polity Press.
20.
Kanter, R. M. (1989) When Giants Learn to Dance. New York: Simon and Schuster.
21.
Kolb, D. A. (1984) Experiential Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22.
Lave, J. C. and Wenger, E. (1990) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Levitt, B. and March, J. (1988) `Organizational Learning', Annual Review of Sociology14: 319-340.
24.
Luhmann, N. (1989) Ecological Communication. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
25.
Luhmann, N. (1990) Essays on Self-Reference. New York: Columbia University Press.
26.
Makridimitris, A. (1989) `The Recent Administrative Reforms, and the Problem of the Functional Modernization of the Administrative Behaviour', Public Sector40: 64-69.
27.
Makridimitris, A. (1994) `Collective Demands and Administrative Reforms', Greek Review of Political Science3: 135-152.
28.
Makridimitris, A. (1995) `Introduction', in A. Makridimitris (ed.) Problems of Administrative Reform. Athens: Sakkoulas.
29.
March, J. G. (1991) `Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning', Organization Science2(1): 71-87.
30.
Mason, R. O. and Mitroff, I. I. (1981) Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions. New York: Wiley.
31.
Maturana, H. (1987) `Everything is Said by an Observer', in W. I. Thompson (ed.) Gaia: a Way of Knowing. CA: Lindisfarne Press.
32.
Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1980) Autopoiesis and Cognition. Holland: Reindel.
33.
Matustik, M. J. (1995) `Towards a Radical Democratic Multiculturalism', Constellations1(3): 383-398.
34.
Meyer, J. and Rowan, B. (1977) `Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony', American Journal of Sociology.83(2): 340-363.
35.
Meyer, J. W. and Scott, W. R. (eds) (1992) Organizational Environments. London: Sage.
36.
Mintzberg, H. (1975). `The Manager's Job: Folklore and Fact', Harvard Business Review53: 49-61.
37.
Mouzelis, N. (1990) Post-Marxist Alternatives. London: Macmillan.
38.
Pavitt, K. (1991) `Key Characteristics of the Large Innovating Firm', British Journal of Management2: 41-50.
39.
Prahalad, C. and Hamel, G. (1990) `The Core Competence of the Corporation', Harvard Business Review (May-June): 79-91.
40.
Schon, D. A. (1994) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
41.
Scott, W. R. and Meyer, J. W. (1992) `The Organization of Societal Sectors', in J. W. Meyer and W. R. Scott (eds) Organizational Environments. London: Sage.
42.
Senge, P. (1990) The Fifth Discipline. New York: Doubleday Currency.
43.
Sims, D. and McAulay, L. (1994) `Management Learning as a Learning Process: an Invitation', Management Learning 1.
44.
Spanou, K. (1995) `Looking for Modernization', in A. Makridimitris (ed.) Problems of Administrative Reform. Athens: Sakkoulas.
45.
Spencer-Brown, G. (1979) Laws of Forms. London: Dutton.
46.
Swidler, A. (1986) `Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies', Amer. Soc. Review51: 273-286.
47.
Swieringa, J. and Wierdsma, A. (1992) Becoming a Learning Organization. Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley.
48.
Tsoukalas, C. (1981) Social Development and State. Athens: Themelion.
49.
Ulrich, W. (1983) Critical Heuristics of Social Planning. Berne: Haupt.
50.
Varela, F. , Thompson, E. and Rasch, E. (1991) The Embodied Mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
51.
Varvaressos, K. (1952) Report on the Greek Economic Problem. Washington, DC.
52.
Vickers, G. (1983) Human Systems Are Different. London: Harper & Row.
53.
Von Foerster, H. (1979) `Cybernetics of Cybernetics', in K Krippendorff (ed.) Communications and Control in Society. New York: Gordon and Breach.
54.
Waldo, D. (1984) The Administrative State. New York: Holmes and Meier Publishers.
55.
Warfield, J. (1984) `Principles of Interactive Management', proceedings of the International Conference on Cybernetics and Society. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
