Most writers on management development in central and eastern Europe mention the importance of cultural differences; relatively few elucidate the implications for the creation of an effective learning situation in any great detail. In this brief response to Holden and Cooper the limits to our effectiveness as change agents are discussed in terms of depth of change, and it is suggested that the chief difficulty relates to learning strategy rather than teaching strategy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bourdieu, P. (1971) `Systems of Education and Systems of Thought', in M. F. D. Young (ed.) Knowledge and Control: New Directions for the Sociology of Education. London: Collier Macmillan.
2.
Clegg, S. R. (1992) `Postmodern Management?`, Journal of Organisational Change Management, 5(2): 31-49.
3.
Cooper, C. L. (1982) `A Theory of Management Learning: Its Implications for Management Education', in R. Freedman, C. L. Cooper and S. A. Stumpf (eds) Management Education: Issues in Theory, Research and Practice. Chichester: Wiley.
4.
Hibbert, N. (1990) `Training Soviet Managers: Coventry Polytechnic's Pioneering Courses', Industry and Higher Education4(4): 231-237.
5.
Jankowicz, A. D. (1984) `The New Journey to Jerusalem: Mission and Meaning in the Managerial Crusade to Eastern Europe', Organization Studies15(4): 479-507.
6.
Kelman, H. C. (1970) `Processes of Opinion Change', in W. G. Bennis, K. D. Benne and R. Chin (eds) The Planning of Change. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
7.
Novak, J. M. (1990) `Advancing Constructive Education', in G. J. Neimeyer and R. A. Neimeyer (eds) Advances in Personal Construct Psychology. London: JAI Press.
8.
Reason, P. and Rowan, J. eds (1981) Human Inquiry: A Sourcebook of New Paradigm Research. Chichester: Wiley.
9.
Yanouzas, J. N. and Boukis, S. D. (1993) `Transporting Management Training into Poland: Some Surprises and Disappointments', Journal of Management Development12(1): 64-71.