Abstract
It is clear from the work of Watkins and Marsick that management devel opers - both internal and external to the organisation — will often undermine their own objectives through inconsistent, paradoxical behaviour. Through the literature on group and family therapy, it can be seen that paradoxes are a normal by-product of the way people assign meaning to interpersonal action. Case studies from the author's separate research efforts illustrate four paradoxes which affect human resource or management developers. A model for encouraging reciprocally reflective learning based on the works of Argyris (1982) and Schon (1987) is offered to enable individuals to critically examine paradoxes in their work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
