With this essay, we identify and resist a sensory imperative in management and organizational research and beyond. We define the sensory imperative as an uncritical embrace of the idea that the senses offer a unique and attractive methodological and political position for studying managerial and organizational life and for challenging dominant forms of knowledge production. By falling in with this imperative, the turn to the senses in management and organization studies risks losing sight of its own mediations. We propose three ways of regaining sight of these mediations, which, we argue, come together as an analytical sensorisation – a study of, rather than with, the senses.
ArendtH (1978) The Life of the Mind. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace.
2.
BarnettC (2008) Political affects in public space: Normative blind-spots in non-representational ontologies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers33(2): 186–200.
3.
BarnwellA (2016) Creative paranoia: Affect and social method. Emotion, Space and Society20: 10–17.
4.
BarthesR (1985) The Responsibility of Forms: Critical Essays on Music, Art, and Representation (trans. HowardR). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
BerlantL (2011) Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press.
7.
BeyesTSteyaertC (2020) Unsettling bodies of knowledge: Walking as a pedagogy of affect. Management Learning52(2): 224–242.
8.
BoncoriISmithC (2019) I lost my baby today: Embodied writing and learning in organizations. Management Learning50(1): 74–86.
9.
BrewisDNWilliamsE (2019) Writing as skin: Negotiating the body in(to) learning about the managed self. Management Learning50(1): 87–99.
10.
DavidsonEBrashJ (2021) Sensorial politics. Environment and Planning C39(6): 1069–1078.
11.
DewsburyJD (2003) Witnessing space: ‘Knowledge without contemplation’. Environment and Planning A35(11): 1907–1932.
12.
EssénAVärlanderSW (2012) The mutual constitution of sensuous and discursive understanding in scientific practice: An autoethnographic lens on academic writing. Management Learning44(4): 395–423.
13.
GilmoreSHardingNHelinJ, et al. (2019) Writing differently. Management Learning50(1): 3–10.
14.
HarawayD (1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies14(3): 575.
15.
HarawayD (1997) Modest_ Witness@ – Feminism and Technoscience. London: Routledge.
16.
HaylesNKPulizziJJ (2010) Narrating consciousness: Language, media and embodiment. History of the Human Sciences23(3): 131–148.
IngoldT (2000) The Perception of the Environment, Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.
19.
IngoldT (2011) Worlds of sense and sensing the world: A response to Sarah Pink and David Howes. Social Anthropology19(3): 313–317.
20.
JamesonF (1991) Postmodernism. London: Verso.
21.
LashS (2007) Power after hegemony: Cultural studies in mutation?Theory, Culture & Society24(3): 55–78.
22.
Merleau-PontyM (1968) The Visible and the Invisible (trans: Alphonso Lingis). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
23.
MichelsCHindleyCKnowlesD, et al. (2020) Learning atmospheres: Re-imagining management education through the dérive. Management Learning51(5): 559–578.
24.
NietzscheF ([1887] 2001) The Gay Science. Edited by Bernard Williams (trans. NauckhoffJ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
O’DohertyDP (2013) Off-road and spaced-out in the city: Organization and the interruption of topology. Space and Culture16(2): 211–228.
26.
PinkS (2009) Situating sensory ethnography: From academia to intervention. In: PinkS (ed.) Doing Sensory Ethnography. London: SAGE, 7–22.
27.
PinkS (2010) The future of sensory anthropology/the anthropology of the senses. Social Anthropology18(3): 331–333.
28.
PinkS (2013) Engaging the senses in ethnographic practice: Implications and advances. Senses and Society8(3): 261–267.
29.
ReckwitzA (2012) Affective spaces: A praxeological outlook. Rethinking History16(2): 241–258.
30.
ReckwitzA (2017) How the senses organise the social. In: JonasMLittigedsB (eds) Praxeological Political Analysis. London; New York: Routledge56–66.
31.
StewartK (2007) Ordinary Affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
32.
StewartK (2008) Weak theory in an unfinished world. Journal of Folklore Research45(1): 71–82.
33.
StollerP (1997) Sensuous Scholarship. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
34.
StrathernM (1996) Cutting the network. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute2(3): 517–535.
35.
TaussigM (1993) Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses. New York; London: Routledge.
36.
ThriftN (2004) Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography86(1): 57–78.
37.
ThriftN (2008) Non-representational Theory. London; New York: Routledge.
38.
WacquantL (2015) For a sociology of flesh and blood. Qualitative Sociology38(1): 1–11.
39.
WilliamsR (1977) Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
ZanoniPContuAHealyS, et al. (2017) Post-capitalistic politics in the making: The imaginary and praxis of alternative economies. Organization24(5): 575–588.
41.
ZundelM (2013) Walking to learn: Rethinking reflection for management learning. Management Learning44(2): 109–126.
