Improvisation has been treated largely as if it were a conceptual monolith: all improvisations are similar. We challenge this theorizing by distinguishing forms of improvisation in organizations (semi-structured, episodic, subversive, resistive) and by exploring ways in which these forms interrelate in improvisational sequences. Improvisation is not just something individuals do; it is a learned capacity that organizations can manage. We introduce the dimension of improvisational formality and informality, adding a political dimension to the study of the topic. By combining forms in process sequences, we organize the existing literature under a systematic perspective facilitating theory development via an integrative understanding of how improvisation produces learning.
AbbottA (1995) Sequence analysis: New methods for old ideas. Annual Review of Sociology21: 93–113.
2.
AdlerPSBorysB (1996) Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly41: 61–89.
3.
AgarwalRHelfatC (2009) Strategic renewal of organizations. Organization Science20: 281–293.
4.
AusterERRuebottomT (2013) Navigating the politics and emotions of change. MIT Sloan Management Review54: 31–36.
5.
BakerTNelsonR (2005) Creating something out of nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly50: 329–366.
6.
BernsteinEBarrettFJ (2011) Strategic change and the jazz mindset: Exploring forms that enhance dynamic capabilities for organizational improvisation. Research in Organizational Change and Development19: 55–90.
7.
BettisRPrahaladCK (1995) The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strategic Management Journal16: 5–14.
8.
BeunzaDStarkD (2003) The organization of responsiveness: Innovation and recovery in the trading rooms of Lower Manhattan. Socio-Economic Review1: 135–164.
9.
BinghamCBEisenhardtKM (2011) Rational heuristics: The ‘simple rules’ that strategists learn from process experience. Strategic Management Journal32: 1437–1464.
10.
BinghamCBEisenhardtKMFurrNR (2011) Which strategy when?MIT Sloan Management Review53: 71–78.
11.
BradyM (2011) Improvisation versus rigid command and control at Stalingrad. Journal of Management History17(1): 27–49.
12.
BrownJSDuguidP (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science2(1): 40–57.
13.
BrownSLEisenhardtKM (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly42: 1–34.
14.
BurawoyM (1979) Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
CharlesKDawsonP (2011) Dispersed change agency and the improvisation of strategies during processes of change. Journal of Change Management11(3): 329–351.
16.
ChatterjeeS (2013) Simple rules for designing business models. California Management Review55(2): 97–124.
17.
ChelariuCJohnstonWJYoungL (2002) Learning to improvise, improvising to learn: A process of responding to complex environment. Journal of Business Research55: 41–147.
18.
CleggSR (1990) Modern Organizations: Organization Studies in the Postmodern World. London: SAGE.
19.
CleggSRCunhaJVCunhaMP (2002) Management paradoxes: A relational perspective. Human Relations55: 483–503.
20.
CleggSRCourpassonDPhillipsN (2006) Power and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
CleggSRKornbergerMRhodesC (2004) Noise, parasites and translation. Theory and form in management consulting. Management Learning35: 31–44.
22.
CohenSTaylorL (1976) Escape Attempts: The Theory and Form of Resistance in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
23.
CoopeyJBurgoyneJ (2000) Politics and organizational learning. Journal of Management Studies37(6): 869–886.
24.
CourpassonDCleggSRDanyF (2012) Resisters at work: Generating productive resistance in the workplace. Organization Science23(3): 801–819.
25.
CrossanMMCunhaMPVeraD. (2005) Time and organizational improvisation. Academy of Management Review30(1): 129–145.
26.
CrossanMMHurstDK (2006) Strategic renewal as improvisation: Reconciling the tension between exploration and exploitation. In: BaumJACDobrevSDVan WitteloostuijnA(eds) Ecology and Strategy (Advances in Strategic Management, Volume 23) Emerald, 273–298.
27.
CrossanMMWhiteRELaneHW. (1996) The improvising organization: Where planning meets opportunity. Organizational Dynamics24(4): 20–35.
28.
CrozierMFriedbergE (1976) L’acteur et le système. Paris: Seuil.
29.
CunhaMPCunhaJVKamocheK (1999) Organizational improvisation: What, when, how and why. International Journal of Management Reviews1(3): 299–341.
30.
CunhaMPKamocheKCunhaRC (2003) Organizational improvisation and leadership: A field study in two computer-mediated settings. International Studies of Management and Organization33: 34–57.
31.
CunhaMPRegoAKamocheK (2009) Improvisation in service recovery. Managing Service Quality19: 657–669.
32.
D’AveniRA (1995) Coping with hypercompetition: Utilizing the new 7-S’s framework. Academy of Management Executive9: 45–57.
33.
D’AveniRALewinAY (1996) New organizational forms and strategies for managing in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science7: 21–220.
34.
DayGShoemakerP (2008) Are you a vigilant leader?MIT Sloan Management Review49(3): 43–51.
35.
De CerteauM (1984) The Form of Everyday Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
36.
De HolanPPhillipsNLawrenceTB (2004) Managing organizational forgetting. MIT Sloan Management Review45(2): 45–51.
37.
DeroyXCleggSR (2011) Events and rules: The search for missing links. Organization18(5): 637–653.
38.
DeshpandéRRainaA (2011) The ordinary heroes of the Taj. Harvard Business Review, December, 119–123.
39.
EisenhardtKM (2010) Silicon Valley, theories of organization, and the Stanford legacy. Research in the Sociology of Organizations28: 191–205.
40.
EisenhardtKMPiezunkaH (2011) Complexity theory and corporate strategy. In AllenPMaguireSMcKelveyB. (eds) The Sage handbook of complexity and management. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 506–523.
41.
EisenhardtKMSullD (2001) Strategy as simple rules. Harvard Business Review, January, 107–116.
42.
EthirajSKLevinthalD (2009) Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: Complex organizations and multiple goals. Organization Science20: 4–21.
43.
FeldmanMS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science11: 611–629.
44.
GarudRJainSTuertscherP (2008) Incomplete by design and designing for incompleteness. Organization Studies29: 351–371.
45.
GelbergD (1997) The ‘Business’ of Reforming American Schools. New York: State University of New York Press.
46.
GoddardJEcclesT (2013) Uncommon Sense, Common Nonsense. London: Profile Books.
47.
GoffmanE (1961) Asylums. New York: Anchor Books.
48.
GordonRD (2007) Power, Knowledge and Domination. Abington, MA: Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press.
49.
GrantAMAshfordSJ (2008) The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior28: 3–34.
50.
GrantAMBerryJW (2011) The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal54: 73–96.
51.
GundelS (2005) Towards a new typology of crises. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management13(3): 106–115.
52.
HallJ (2010) An autopoietic aesthetic for interactive robotic installation. Available at: http://www.jenhall.org/autopoetic.html (accessed 26 October 2013).
53.
HamelG (2000) Waking up IBM: How a gang of unlikely rebels transformed Big Blue. Harvard Business Review, July–August, 137–146.
54.
HamelG (2011) First let’s fire all the managers. Harvard Business Review, December, 8–60.
55.
HargadonABDouglasY (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly46: 476–501.
56.
HarrisLCOgbonnaM (2006) Service sabotage: A study of antecedents and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science34: 543–558.
57.
HelfatCEWinterSG (2011) Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (n)ever changing world. Strategic Management Journal32(11): 1243–1250.
58.
HirshmanAO (1995) A Propensity to Self-Subversion. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
59.
HoffmanDAStetzenA (1998) The role of safety climate and communication in accident interpretation: Implications for learning from negative events. Academy of Management Review41(6): 644–657.
60.
HoldenNJ (2011) ‘Not with the mind alone’: A critique of ‘Knowledge transfer between Russian and Western firms: Whose absorptive capacity is in question?’ by Snejina Michailova and Irina Jormanainen. Critical Perspectives on International Business7(4): 350–356.
61.
IgnatiusA (2011) How eBay developed a culture of experimentation. Harvard Business Review, March, 93–97.
62.
JarzabkowskiPALêJKFeldmanMS (2012) Toward a theory of coordinating: Creative coordinating mechanisms in form. Organization Science23(4): 907–927.
63.
JordanS (2010) Learning to be surprised: How to foster reflective form in a high-reliability context. Management Learning41(4): 391–413.
64.
KamocheKCunhaMP (2001) Minimal structures: From jazz improvisation to product innovation. Organization Studies22: 733–764.
65.
KamocheKCunhaMP (2008) Improvisation and knowledge: The challenge of appropriation. Management Research6(2): 93–106.
66.
KayJ (2011) Obliquity. London: Profile Books.
67.
KetsdeVriesMFR (1990) The organizational fool: Balancing a leader’s hubris. Human Relations43: 751–770.
68.
KyriakopoulosK (2011) Improvisation in product innovation: The contingent role of market information sources and memory types. Organization Studies32: 1051–1078.
69.
LangleyASmallmanCTsoukasH. (2013) Process studies of change in organizations and management: Unveiling temporality, activity and flow. Academy of Management Journal56(1): 1–13.
70.
LawrenceTBMauwsMKDyckB. (2005) The politics of organizational learning: Integrating power into the 4I framework. Academy of Management Review30(1): 180–191.
71.
LervikJEFahyKMEasterby-SmithM (2010) Temporal dynamics of situated leaning in organizations. Management Learning41(3): 285–301.
72.
LovasBGhoshalS (2000) Strategy as guided evolution. Strategic Management Journal21(9): 875–896.
73.
McCabeD (2014) Making out and making do: How employees resist and make organizational change work through consent in a UK bank. Work, Employment & Society29(1): 57–71.
74.
McGrathRG (2010) Business models: A discovery driven approach. Long Range Planning43: 247–261.
75.
McGrathRG (2013) Transient advantage. Harvard Business Review, June, 62–70.
76.
MachinDCarrithersM (1996) From interpretive communities to communities of improvisation. Media, Culture & Society18: 343–352.
77.
MagniMMarupingLM (2013) Sink or swim: Empowering leadership and overload in teams’ ability to deal with the unexpected. Human Resource Management52(5): 715–739.
78.
MagniMProserpioLHoeglM. (2009) The role of team behavioral integration and cohesion in shaping individual improvisation. Research Policy38: 1044–1053.
79.
MainemelisC (2010) Stealing fire: Creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Academy of Management Review35: 558–578.
80.
MainemelisCRonsonS (2006) Ideas are born in fields of play: Towards a theory of play and creativity in organizational settings. Research in Organizational Behavior27: 81–131.
81.
ManningPK (2008) Goffman on organizations. Organization Studies29: 677–699.
82.
MarchJG (1976) The technology of foolishness. In: MarchJGOlsenJ (eds) Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, 69–81.
83.
MarchJG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science2(1): 71–87.
84.
MarchJGSimonHA (1958) Organizations. New York: Wiley.
85.
Martin de HolanPNelsonPLawrenceTB (2004) Managing organizational forgetting. MIT Sloan Management Review45(2): 45–51.
86.
MichelliJA (2008) The New Gold Standard. New York: McGraw-Hill.
87.
MillerPWedell-WedellsborgT (2013) The case for stealth innovation. Harvard Business Review, March, 91–97.
88.
MinerASBassoffPMoormanC (2001) Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly46: 304–337.
89.
MirvisP (1994) Environmentalism in progressive businesses. Journal of Organizational Change Management7: 82–100.
90.
MoormanCMinerAS (1998) The convergence between planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development. Journal of Marketing62: 1–20.
91.
MumfordMDHunterSTEubanksDL. (2007) Developing leaders for creative efforts: A domain-based approach to leadership development. Human Resource Management Review17: 402–417.
92.
NaultBRVandenboschMB (1996) Eating your own lunch: Protection through pre-emption. Organization Science7: 342–355.
93.
OrlikowskiWJ (1996) Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research7: 63–92.
94.
OrlikowskiWJHofmanD (1997) An improvisational model for change management: The case of groupware technologies. Sloan Management ReviewWinter: 11–21.
95.
OrrJE (1996) Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
96.
PascaleRT (1996) Reflections on Honda. California Management Review38: 112–117.
97.
PascaleRTSterninJ (2005) Your company’s secret change agents. Harvard Business Review83(5): 72–81.
98.
PatriottaG (2003) Sensemaking on the shop floor: Narratives of knowledge in organizations. Journal of Management Studies40: 349–375.
99.
PerryLT (1991) Strategic improvising: How to formulate and implement competitive strategies in concert. Organizational Dynamics19: 51–64.
100.
RashidFEdmondsonACLeonardHB (2013) Leadership lessons from the Chilean mine rescue. Harvard Business Review, July–August, 113–119.
101.
RerupC (2001) ‘Houston, we have a problem’: Anticipation and improvisation as sources of organizational resilience. Comportamento Organizacional e Gestão7(1): 21–44.
102.
RitzerG (2004) The McDonaldization of Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
103.
SawyerK (2003) Group Creativity: Music, Theater, Collaboration. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
104.
SawyerK (2007) Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration. New York: Basic Books.
105.
ScottS (2010) Revisiting the total institution: Performative regulation in the reinventive institution. Sociology44: 213–231.
106.
ShenhavY (1999) Manufacturing Rationality: The Engineering Foundations of the Managerial Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
107.
SonensheinS (2014) How organizations foster the creative use of resources. Academy of Management Journal57(3): 814–848.
108.
StaceyR (1991) The Chaos Frontier. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
109.
StatlerMHeracleousLJacobsCD (2011) Serious play as a form of paradox. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science47: 236–256.
110.
StawBMBoettgerRD (1990) Task revision: A neglected form of work performance. Academy of Management Journal33: 534–559.
111.
StyhreA (2008) The element of play in innovation work: The case of new drug development. Creativity and Innovation Management17(2): 136–146.
112.
SullDEisenhardtKM (2012) Simple rules for a complex world. Harvard Business Review90(9): 69–74.
113.
SuttonRIHargadonAB (1996) Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly41: 685–718.
114.
TaylorFW (1911) The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: W. W. Norton.
115.
ThompsonJD (1967) Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
116.
TsoukasH (2005) Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
TsoukasHDooleyKJ (2011) Introduction to the special issue: Towards the ecological style: Embracing complexity in organizational research. Organization Studies32: 729–735.
119.
TyreMJVon HippelE (1997) The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations. Organization Science8: 71–83.
120.
Van de VenAHPooleMS (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review20: 510–540.
121.
VeraDNemanichLVélez-CástrillonS. (2014) Knowledge-based and contextual factors associated with R&D teams’ improvisation capability. Journal of Management. Epub ahead of print 16April. DOI: 10.1177/0149206314530168.
122.
WebbGChevreauFR (2006) Planning to improvise: The importance of creativity and flexibility in crisis response. International Journal of Emergency Management3(1): 66–72.
123.
WeickKE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing. 2nd edn.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
124.
WeickKE (1989) Organized improvisation: 20 years of organizing. Communication Studies40: 241–248.
125.
WeickKE (1993) The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly38: 628–652.
126.
WeickKE (1999) The aesthetic of imperfection in orchestras and organizations. Comportamento Organizacional e Gestão5: 5–22.
127.
WeickKEQuinnRE (1999) Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology50: 361–386.
128.
WeickKEWestleyF (1996) Organizational learning: Affirming an oxymoron. In: CleggSRHardyCNordWR (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 440–458.
129.
WheelerM (2013) The Art of Negotiation: How to Improvise Agreement in a Chaotic World. New York: Simon & Schuster.
130.
WigginsRRRuefliTW (2005) Schumpeter’s ghost: Is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter?Strategic Management Journal26: 887–911.
131.
YanowDTsoukasH (2009) What is reflection-in-action? A phenomenological account. Journal of Management Studies46: 1339–1346.
132.
YoungMSchlieE (2011) The rhythm of the deal: Negotiation as a dance. Negotiation Journal27(2): 191–203.
