This article addresses the relationship between gender and management as intertwined discursive practices. Following a constructive controversial approach, we proposed to the students to complete a short story in which they have to give a feedback either to a fictitious female or to a male boss. The article has a dual aim since it offers a reflection on a teaching methodology suited to foster critical thinking in the classroom and analyzes the narratives so produced in search of what constitutes the students’ idea of “good management.” In positioning men/women CEO within a narrative, students enact a moral order that evaluates management in society. Their narratives reveal how the economic crisis has undermined the positive image of the male manager, while femaleness is emphasized for its anti-managerial imaginary. Moreover, the idea of what constitutes “good management” is constructed around an idea of care for both male and female CEOs.
AlvessonMBridgmanTWillmottH (2009) The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
AshcraftKL (2011) Gender and diversity: Other ways of making a difference. In: AlvessonMBridgmanTWillmottH (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 304–327.
5.
AtwaterLEBrettJFWaldmanD. (2004) Men’s and women’s perceptions of the gender typing of management subroles. Sex Roles50(3–4): 191–199.
6.
BauerMWGaskellG (eds) (2000) Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound: A Practical Handbook. London: SAGE.
7.
BirdSREricksonKA (2010) A constructive controversy approach to “Case Studies.”Teaching Sociology38(2): 119–131.
8.
BoltanskiLThévenotL (2000) The reality of moral expectations: A sociology of situated judgment. Philosophical Explorations: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action3: 208–231.
9.
BoltanskiLThévenotL (2006 [1991]) On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
BombelliMC (2000) Soffitto di vetro e dintorni. Il management al femminile. Milano: Etas.
11.
CalásMBSmircichL (2009) Feminist perspectives on gender in organizational research: What is and is yet to be. In: BuchananDBrymanA (eds) The Handbook of Organizational Research Models. London: SAGE, 246–269.
12.
CalásMBSmircichLHolvinoE (2014) Theorizing Gender-and-Organization: Changing Times, Changing Theories. In: KumraSSimpsonRBurkeR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Gender in Organizations. London: Oxford University Press, 17–52.
13.
CollinsonDHearnJ (1994) Naming men as men: Implications for work, organization and management. Gender Work and Organization1(1): 2–22.
14.
ConnellR (1987) Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
DaviesBHarréR (1990) Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior20(1): 43–63.
16.
Diaz-BoneR (2011) The methodological standpoint of the “économie des conventions.”Historical Social Research36(4): 43–63.
17.
DodierN (1993) Review article: Action as a combination of “common worlds.”Sociological Review41: 556–571.
18.
DouglasM (1975) Implicit Meanings: Essays in Anthropology. London; Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
19.
EaglyAKarauS (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review109: 573–598.
20.
ElyRJMeyersonDADavidsonMN (2006) Rethinking Political Correctness. Harvard Business Review84(9): 78–87.
21.
FletcherJK (2004) The paradox of postheroic leadership: An essay on gender, power, and transformational change. Leadership Quarterly15: 647–661.
22.
GherardiS (1995) Gender, Symbolism and Organizational Cultures. London: SAGE.
23.
BrownAGabrielYSGherardiS (2009) Storytelling and Change: an Unfolding Story. Organization16(3): 323–334.
24.
GherardiSMurgiaA (in press) Narratives of gender and ‘good management’. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion.
25.
GreyCWillmottHC (2005) Critical Management Studies: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
HazenMAHigbyMA (2005) Teaching an issues-based interdisciplinary course: Diversity in management and marketing. Journal of Management Education29(3): 403–427.
27.
JagdS (2011) Pragmatic sociology and competing orders of worth in organizations. European Journal of Social Theory14: 343–359.
28.
KatilaSErikssonP (2013) He is a firm, strong-minded and empowering leader, but is she? Gendered positioning of female and male CEOs. Gender Work and Organization20(1): 71–84.
29.
KelanEK (2009a) Performing Gender at Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
KelanEK (2009b) Gender fatigue—The ideological dilemma of gender neutrality and discrimination in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences26(3): 197–210.
31.
KelanEK (2013) The becoming of business bodies: Gender, appearance, and leadership development. Management Learning44(1): 45–61.
32.
KelanEKJonesR (2010) Gender and the MBA. Academy of Management Learning & Education9(1): 26–43.
33.
KnightsDKerfootD (2004) Between representations and subjectivity: Gender binaries and the politics of organizational transformation. Gender Work and Organization11(4): 430–454.
34.
KociatkiewiczJKosteraM (2012) The good manager: An archetypical quest for morally sustainable leadership. Organization Studies33(7): 861–878.
35.
McCabeDLButterfieldKDTrevinoLK (2006) Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education5(3): 294–305.
36.
MartinJMeyersonD (1997) Women and power: Conformity, resistance, and disorganized co-action. In: KramerRNealeR (eds) Social Influence in Organizations. Newbury Park: SAGE, 311–348.
37.
MartinPY (1996) Gendering and evaluating dynamics: Men, masculinities and managements. In: CollinsonDLHearnJ (eds) Men as Managers, Managers as Men. London: SAGE, 186–209.
38.
MartinPY (2001) “Mobilizing masculinities”: Women’s experiences of men at work. Organization8: 587–618.
39.
MartinPY (2003) “Said and done” vs. “saying and doing”: Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender & Society17(4): 342–366.
40.
MartinPY (2006) Practising gender at work: Further thoughts on reflexivity. Gender Work and Organization13(3): 254–276.
41.
MeyersonDEFletcherJK (2000) A modest manifesto for shattering the glass ceiling. Harvard Business Review78(1): 126–136.
42.
MurgiaAPoggioB (2011) Sotto il tetto di cristallo: scenari, cause e strategie per infrangerlo. Dialoghi Internazionali15: 75–81.
43.
MurgiaAPoggioB (2014) Moving societies and immobile organizational practices. The winding road of diversity management in Italy. In: KlarsfeldA. (eds) International Handbook on Diversity Management at Work – Second Edition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 123–136.
44.
PatriottaGGondJPSchultzF (2011) Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies48(8): 1804–1835.
45.
Pernkopf-KonhäusnerK (2014) The competent actor: Bridging institutional logics and French pragmatist sociology. Journal of Management Inquiry23(3): 333–337.
46.
PoggioB (2006) Outline of a theory of gender practice. Gender Work and Organization13(3): 232–233.
47.
PotterJ (1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: SAGE.
48.
ScheinVE (2007) Women in management: Reflections and projections. Women in Management Review22(1): 6–18.
49.
ShortKGSchroederJLairdJ. (1996) Learning Together Through Inquiry: From Columbus to Integrated Curriculum. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
50.
SimpsonR (2006) Masculinity and management education: Feminizing the MBA. Academy of Management Learning & Education5(2): 182–193.
51.
SinclairA (2000) Teaching managers about masculinities. Management Learning31(1): 83–101.
52.
SinclairA (2005) Body possibilities in leadership. Leadership1: 387–406.
53.
TörrönenJ (2002) Semiotic theory on qualitative interviewing using stimulus texts. Qualitative Research2: 343–362.
54.
VinnicombeS (2000) The position of women in management in Europe. In: DavidsonMJBurkeRJ (eds) Women in Management: Current Research Issues. London: SAGE, 9–25.
55.
WeickKE (1984) Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist39(1): 40–49.
