This article contributes to the literature on reflexivity by articulating a queer reflexivity lens, which entails engaging in a reflexive questioning of the categories we use to identify people and recognizing the shifting nature of researcher and participant identities over the course of the research process. Queer reflexivity enables us to think differently about an important debate in qualitative methods concerning who can study whom. For instance, are white researchers in a position to study people of color? Are men able to study women and women’s issues? Can “straight”-identified researchers study the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer community? I argue that the question of whether or not to “match” for categories of difference in research studies is complicated by the fluid, shifting nature of identities that queer theory highlights. In order to demonstrate how qualitative organizational researchers can learn about the craft of research through the concept of queer reflexivity, I recount an auto-ethnographic “coming-out” tale in which I discuss the implications of my shifting sexual identity over the course of a research project.
AdamsTE (2011) Narrating the Closet: An Autoethnography of Same-Sex Attraction. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
2.
AdamsTEJonesSH (2011) Telling stories: Reflexivity, queer theory, and autoethnography. Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies11(2): 108–116.
3.
AhmedS (2006) Orientations: Toward a queer phenomenology. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies12(4): 543–574.
4.
AllenL (2010) Queer(y)ing the straight researcher: The relationship(?) between researcher identity and anti-normative knowledge. Feminism & Psychology20(2): 147–165.
5.
AndersenML (1993) Studying across difference: Race, class, and gender in qualitative research. In: StanfieldJHIIRutledgeDM (eds) Race and Ethnicity in Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 39–52.
6.
AustinJL (1975) How to Do Things with Words. 2nd edn.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BellEKingD (2010) The elephant in the room: Critical management studies conferences as a site of body pedagogics. Management Learning41(4): 429–442.
8.
BowringMA (2004) Resistance is not futile: Liberating Captain Janeway from the masculine-feminine dualism of leadership. Gender, Work & Organization11(4): 381–405.
9.
BrewisJHamptonMPLinsteadS (1997) Unpacking Priscilla: Subjectivity and identity in the organization of gendered appearance. Human Relations50(10): 1275–1304.
10.
BrummansBHJM (2007) Travels of a Buddhist mind. Qualitative Inquiry13(8): 1221–1226.
11.
BrummansBHJM (2009) Travels of a Buddhist mind: Returns and continuations. Qualitative Inquiry15(6): 1127–1133.
12.
BruniA (2006) “Have you got a boyfriend or are you single”: On the importance of being “straight” in organizational research. Gender, Work & Organization13(3): 299–316.
13.
ButlerJ (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “sex.” New York: Routledge.
14.
ButlerJ (2004) Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.
15.
ButlerJ (2007) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
16.
CarringtonB (2008) “What’s the footballer doing here?” Racialized performativity, reflexivity, and identity. Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies8(4): 423–452.
17.
CassellCBishopVSymonG. (2009) Learning to be a qualitative management researcher. Management Learning40(5): 513–533.
18.
ChavezC (2008) Conceptualizing from the inside: Advantages, complications, and demands on insider positionality. The Qualitative Report13(3): 474–494.
19.
CunliffeAL (2002) Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. Management Learning33(1): 35–61.
20.
CunliffeAL (2003) Reflexive inquiry in organizational research: Questions and possibilities. Human Relations56(8): 983–1003.
21.
CunliffeALJunJS (2005) The need for reflexivity in public administration. Administration & Society37(2): 225–242.
22.
DenzinNKLincolnYS (2005) Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd edn.London: SAGE, 1–32.
23.
EllisCSBochnerA (2000) Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd edn.London: SAGE, 733–768.
24.
GannonS (2011) Difference as ethical encounter. Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies11(1): 71–75.
25.
GunaratnamY (2003) Researching Race and Ethnicity: Methods, Knowledge and Power. London: SAGE.
26.
HammersCBrownADIII (2004) Towards a feminist-queer alliance: A paradigmatic shift in the research process. Social Epistemology18(1): 85–101.
27.
HardingNLeeHFordJ. (2011) Leadership and charisma: A desire that cannot speak its name?Human Relations64(7): 927–949.
28.
Hesse-BiberSN (2007) The practice of feminist in-depth interviewing. In: Hesse-BiberSNLeavyPL (eds) Feminist Research Practice: A Primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 111–148.
29.
hooksb (1989) Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
30.
JacobMM (2006) When a native “goes researcher”: Notes from the North American indigenous games. American Behavioral Scientist50(4): 450–461.
31.
JaggarAM (2008) The social sciences. In: JaggarAM (ed.) Just Methods: An Interdisciplinary Feminist Reader. Boulder, CO: Paradigm, pp. 34–39.
32.
KempsterSStewartJ (2010) Becoming a leader: A co-produced autoethnographic exploration of leadership practice. Management Learning41(2): 205–219.
33.
KennedyEDavisM (1996) Constructing an ethnohistory of the Buffalo lesbian community: Reflexivity, dialogue and politics. In: LewinE andLeapW (eds) Out of the Field: Reflections of Lesbian and Gay Anthropologists. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 171–199.
34.
KongTSKMahoneyDPlummerK (2003) Queering the interview. In: HolsteinJAGubriumJF (eds) Inside Interviewing: New Lenses, New Concerns. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 91–110.
35.
La PastinaAC (2006) The implications of an ethnographer’s sexuality. Qualitative Inquiry12(4): 724–735.
36.
LeeHLearmonthMHardingN (2008) Queer(y)ing public administration. Public Administration86(1): 149–167.
37.
LervikJEFahyKMEasterby-SmithM (2010) Temporal dynamics of situated learning in organizations. Management Learning41(3): 285–301.
MumbyDK (1998) Organizing men: Power, discourse, and the social construction of masculinity(s) in the workplace. Communication Theory8(2): 164–183.
40.
ParkerM (2002) Queering management and organization. Gender, Work & Organization9(2): 146–166.
41.
PoulosCN (2009) Accidental Ethnography: An Inquiry into Family Secrecy. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
42.
RasmussenM (2006) Becoming Subjects: Sexualities and Secondary Schooling. New York: Routledge.
43.
RhodesPJ (1994) Race-of-interviewer effects: A brief comment. Sociology28(2): 547–558.
44.
RodriguezD (2010) Storytelling in the field: Race, method, and the empowerment of Latina college students. Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies10(6): 491–507.
45.
RookeA (2009) Queer in the field: On emotions, temporality, and performativity in ethnography. Journal of Lesbian Studies13(2): 149–160.
46.
RumensN (2008) Working at intimacy: Gay men’s workplace friendships. Gender, Work & Organization15(1): 9–30.
47.
RumensNKerfootD (2009) Gay men at work: (Re)constructing the self as professional. Human Relations62(5): 763–786.
48.
Scott-DixonK (2004) Doing IT: Women Working in Information Technology. Toronto, ON, Canada: Sumach Press.
49.
SedgwickEK (2008) Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
50.
ShermanR (2002) The subjective experience of race and gender in qualitative research. American Behavioral Scientist45(8): 1247–1253.
51.
ShowalterE (1989) A criticism of our own: Autonomy and assimilation in Afro-American and feminist literary theory. In: CohenR (ed.) The Future of Literary Theory. New York: Routledge, pp. 347–369.
52.
SmithDE (2008) Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. In: JaggarA (ed.) Just Methods: An Interdisciplinary Feminist Reader. Boulder, CO: Paradigm, 39–43.
53.
SmithLT (1999) Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.
54.
TwineFW (2000) Racial ideologies and racial methodologies. In: TwineFWWarrenJW (eds) Racing Research, Researching Race: Methodological Dilemmas in Critical Race Studies. New York: New York University Press, 1–34.
55.
TylerMCohenL (2008) Management in/as comic relief: Queer theory and gender performativity in The Office. Gender, Work & Organization15(2): 113–132.
VeroffJDiStefanoA (2002) Introduction. American Behavioral Scientist45(8): 1188–1196.
58.
ViladrichA (2005) “You just belong to us”: Tales of identity and difference with populations to which the ethnographer belongs. Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies5(3): 383–401.
59.
WagleTCantaffaDT (2008) Working our hyphens: Exploring identity relations in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry14(1): 135–159.
60.
WalbyK (2010) Interviews as encounters: Issues of sexuality and reflexivity when men interview men about commercial same sex relations. Qualitative Research10(6): 639–657.
61.
WatsonBScrantonS (2001) Confronting Whiteness? Researching the leisure lives of South Asian mothers. Journal of Gender Studies10(3): 265–277.
62.
Weiner-LevyN (2009) When the hegemony studies the minority—An Israeli Jewish researcher studies Druze women: Transformations of power, alienation, and affinity in the field. Qualitative Inquiry15(4): 721–739.
