What needs to happen in business schools to create a space for social justice? In this article I explore business faculty members’ perspectives on social justice as a means of illuminating the ideological and institutional forces affecting pedagogy and examining the future for social justice within business schools. Participants identified three hegemonic forces driving business programs: profit-driven business ideologies, the particular character of MBA programs, and bias toward quantitative research in business programs. These forces negated the ways in which faculty engaged with social justice concepts and the ways in which they could teach and research within their respective business schools. I review these hegemonic forces and suggest that in order for social justice to be realized within business schools there has to be institutional redesign which could, potentially, be triggered by disruptive institutional work.
AlcarazJMThiruvattalE (2010) An interview with Manuel Escudero: The United Nations’ principles for responsible management education: A global call for sustainability. Academy of Management Learning & Education9(3): 542–550.
BaetzCMSharpJD (2004) Integrating ethics content into the core business curriculum: Do core teaching materials do the job?Journal of Business Ethics51(1): 53–62.
4.
BainK (2004) What the Best College Teachers Do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BanerjeeSB (2008) Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology34(1): 51–79.
6.
BoyceG (2008) The social relevance of ethics education in a global(ising) era: From individual dilemmas to systemic crises. Critical Perspectives on Accounting19(2): 255–290.
7.
BurtonBKDunnCP (1996) Feminist ethics as moral grounding for stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly6(3): 133–147.
8.
CameronKSDuttonJEQuinnRE (eds) (2003) Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
9.
CaputoRK (2000) Multiculturalism and social justice in the United States: An attempt to reconcile the irreconcilable within a pragmatic liberal framework. Race, Gender, & Class7(4): 161–182.
10.
CaputoRK (2002) Social justice, the ethics of care, and market economies. Families in Society83(4): 355–364.
11.
ChristensenLPeirceEHartmanL. (2007) Ethics, CSR, and sustainability education in the Financial Times top 50 global business schools: Baseline data and future research directions. Journal of Business Ethics73(4): 347–368.
CraggW (1997) Teaching business ethics: The role of ethics in business and in business education. Journal of Business Ethics16(3): 231–245.
14.
CraggW (2010) The state and future directions of business ethics research and practice. Business Ethics Quarterly20(4): 720–721.
15.
CraneF (2004) The teaching of ethics: An imperative at business schools. Journal of Education for Business79(3): 149–151.
16.
CraneAMcWilliamsAMattenD. (eds) (2008) The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
CunliffeALLinsteadSA (2009) Introduction: Teaching from critical perspectives. Management Learning40(1): 5–9.
18.
CunliffeALForrayJMKnightsD (2002) Considering management education: Insights from critical management studies. Journal of Management Education26(5): 489–495.
19.
CurrieGKnightsD (2003) Reflecting on a critical pedagogy in MBA education. Management Learning34(1): 27–49.
20.
CurrieGKnightsDStarkeyK (2010) Introduction: A post-crisis critical reflection on business schools. British Journal of Management21(S1): s1–s5.
21.
DehlerGE (2009) Prospects and possibilities of Critical Management Education: Critical beings and a pedagogy of critical action. Management Learning40(1): 31–49
22.
DiMaggioPJPowellWW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48: 147–160.
23.
DoaneD (2005) The myth of CSR: The problem with assuming that companies can do well while also doing good is that markets don’t really work that way. Stanford Social Innovation Review (Fall): 23–29.
24.
DunneSHarneySParkerM (2008) The responsibility of management intellectuals: A survey. Organization15(2): 271–282.
25.
EngsterD (2007) The Heart of Justice: Care Ethics and Political Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
EnnisCD (1994) Knowledge and beliefs underlying curricular expertise. Quest46(2): 164–175.
27.
EvansJFMarcalEL (2005) Educating for ethics: Business deans’ perspectives. Business & Society Review110(3): 233–248.
28.
FenwickT (2005) Ethical dilemmas of critical management education: Within classrooms and beyond. Management Learning36(1): 31–48.
29.
Fernandez-BalboaJStiehlJ (1995) The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching & Teacher Education11(3): 293–306.
30.
GephartRPJr (2004) Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal47(4): 454–462.
31.
GempesawCB (2009) Do business schools have a role in the current financial crisis?Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education7(2): 333–337.
32.
GentileMC (2010) Giving Voice to Values. New Haven: Yale University Press.
33.
GhoshalS (2005) Bad management theories are destroying good management practice. Academy of Management Learning & Education4(1): 75–91.
34.
GiacaloneARThompsonRK (2006) Business ethics and social responsibility education: Shifting the worldview. Academy of Management Learning and Education5(3): 266–277.
35.
GilliganC (1982) In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
GladwinTNKennellyJJKrauseTS (1996) Toward eco-moral development of the Academy of Management [Dialogue]. Academy of Management Review21(4): 912–914.
37.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
38.
GordonI (2011) Lessons to be learned: An examination of Canadian and US financial accounting and auditing textbooks for ethics/governance coverage. Journal of Business Ethics101(1): 29–47.
39.
GreyC (2004) Reinventing business schools: The contribution of critical management education. Academy of Management Learning and Education3(2):178–186.
GreyCWillmottH (eds) (2005) Critical Management Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
HeldV (2006) Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. London: Oxford University Press.
43.
IsaksonHRawwasMSwaidanZ (2007) A comparative study of ethical beliefs of master of business administration students in the United States with those in Hong Kong. Journal of Education for Business82(3): 146–159.
44.
JonkerJMarbergA (2007) Corporate social responsibility quo vadis?Journal of Corporate Citizenship27: 107–118.
45.
KennedyMM (1979) Generalizing from single case studies. Evaluation Review3(4): 661–678.
46.
KhuranaR (2007) From Higher Aims to Hired Hands: The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Potential of Management as a Profession. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
KhuranaRNohriaN (2008) It’s time to make management a true profession. Harvard Business Review86(10): 70–77.
48.
KletzP (2009) Research in social responsibility: A challenge for management education. Management Decision47(10): 1582–1594.
49.
KonowJ (2003) Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. Journal of Economic Literature41(4): 1188–1239.
50.
KuhnTDeetzS (2008) Critical theory and corporate social responsibility: Can/should we get beyond cynical reasoning? In: CraneAMcWilliamsAMattenD. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.173–196.
51.
LamsaAVehkaperaMPuttonenT. (2008) Effect of business education on women and men students’ attitudes on corporate responsibility in society. Journal of Business Ethics82(1): 45–58.
52.
LauferWilliam S. (2003) Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics43(3): 253–61.
53.
LavelleLGloecklerG (2010) B-Schools: Help wanted. BusinessWeek4173: 75–76.
54.
LawrenceTBSuddabyRLecaB (2009) Institutional Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
LearmonthM (2007) Critical management education in action: Personal tales of management unlearning. Academy of Management Learning & Education6(1): 109–113.
LewisM (2005) More than meets the eye: The underside of corporate culture of higher education and possibilities for a new feminist critique. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing21(1): 7–25.
58.
LewisM (2008) New strategies of control: Academic freedom and research ethics boards. Qualitative Inquiry14(5): 684–699.
59.
LincolnYSGubaEG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
60.
LockeK (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
61.
McCrackenG (1988) The Long Interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
62.
McCrawHMoffeitKO’MalleyJ (2009) An analysis of the ethical codes of corporations and business schools. Journal of Business Ethics87(1): 1–13.
63.
McMillanHJSchumacherS (2006) Research in Education: Evidence-based Inquiry. 6th edn.New York: Pearson.
64.
MarensR (2010) Destroying the village to save it: Corporate social responsibility, labour relations, and the rise and fall of American hegemony. Organization17(6): 743–766.
65.
MargolisJDWalshJP (2003) Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly48: 268–305.
66.
MattenDMoonJ (2004) Corporate social responsibility education in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics54(4): 323–337.
67.
MillerD (1991) Recent theories of social justice. British Journal of Political Science21(3): 371–391.
68.
NavarroP (2008) The MBA core curricula of top-ranked US business schools: A study in failure?Journal of Management Learning & Education7(1): 108–123.
69.
NewellPFrynasJG (2007) Beyond CSR? Business, poverty and social justice: An introduction. Third World Quarterly28(4): 669–681.
70.
NoddingsN (1984) Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
71.
OrlitzkyMSiegelDWaldmanD (2011) Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Business & Society50(1): 6–27.
72.
PajaresMF (1992) Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research62(3): 307–332.
73.
ParkerM (2003) Business, ethics and business ethics: Critical theory and negative dialectics. In: AlvessonMWillmottH (eds) Studying Management Critically. London: SAGE, pp.197–219.
74.
PattonQM (2002) Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd edn.London: SAGE.
75.
PerritonL (2007) Really useful knowledge? Critical management education in the UK and the US. Scandinavian Journal of Management23: 66–83.
76.
PerritonL (2009) A reflection on the significance of numbers. Management Learning40(4): 393–399.
77.
PerritonLReynoldsM (2004) Critical management education: From pedagogy of possibility to pedagogy of refusal, Management Learning35(1): 61–77.
78.
PfefferJFongTC (2002) The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education1(1): 78–95.
79.
PrichardC (2009) Three moves for engaging students in Critical Management Studies. Management Learning40(1): 51–68.
80.
RocaE (2008) Introducing practical wisdom in business schools. Journal of Business Ethics82(3): 607–620.
81.
RubinJHRubinSI (2005) Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. 2nd edn.London: SAGE.
82.
RusinkoCASamaLM (2009) Greening and sustainability across the management curriculum: An extended journey. Journal of Management Education33(3): 271–275.
StarikMRandsGMarcusAA. (2010) From the guest editors: In search of sustainability in management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education9(3): 377–383.
87.
StarkeyKTiratsooN (2007) The Business School and the Bottom Line. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
88.
SterbaJP (1999) Feminine justice and the family. In: SterbaJP (ed.) Justice: Alternative Political Perspectives. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, pp.282–290.
89.
SuddabyR (2006) From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal49(4): 633–642.
TraiserSEighmyM (2011) Moral development and narcissism of private and public university business students. Journal of Business Ethics99(3): 325–334.
92.
TrontoJ (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge, Chapman, and Hall.
93.
VallarioCW (2010) The role business schools play in promoting corporate social responsibility. Financial Executive26(6): 52–55.
94.
WelshMADehlerGE (2007) Whither the MBA? Or the withering of MBAs?Management Learning38(4): 405–423.
95.
WindsorD (2008) Educating for responsible management. In: CraneAMcWilliamsDMattenDetal. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.503–521.
96.
ZellD (2001) The market-driven business school: Has the pendulum swung too far?Journal of Management Inquiry10(4): 324–338.
