This article responds to calls from the field of organizational aesthetics to study and represent sensible-aesthetic knowledge with artistic-aesthetic approaches. An artistic-aesthetic touchstone artifact engages the sensibilities of 54 MBA Organizational Behavior students as they take an aesthetic risk to enjoy exploring and re-presenting the aesthetic dimension of group organizational life. In the context of dominant business school pedagogic practices that tend to neglect aesthetics, student reflections reveal that the creative process itself is imbued with its own aesthetic value. This study contributes to artistic-aesthetic knowing at the group level of understanding. This paper also makes a contribution to the field of organizational aesthetics by extending its reach into management education practices. It is further suggested that an aesthetic inquiry into the aesthetics of management education is well worth the effort. In accordance with aesthetic criteria, this paper seeks to represent a plausible account of this management education journey.
AdlerN (2006) The arts and leadership: Now that we can do anything what will we do?Academy of Management Learning and Education5(4): 486–499.
2.
BaldacchinoJ (2009) Education beyond Education. New York: Peter Lang.
3.
BarryD (2008) The art of …. In: BarryDHansenH (eds) The SAGE Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization. London: SAGE, pp.31–40.
4.
BarryDMeisiekS (2010a) Seeing more and seeing differently: Sensemaking, mindfulness, and the workarts. Organization Studies31(12): 1–26.
5.
BarryDMeisiekS (2010b) The art of leadership and its fine art shadow. Leadership6(3): 331–349.
6.
BeyesTMichelsC (2011) The production of educational space: Heterotopia and the business university. Management Learning42(5): 521–536.
7.
BinghamSHernandezA (2009) ‘Laughing matters’: The comedian as social observer, teacher and conduit of the sociological perspective. Teaching Sociology37(4): 335–352.
8.
CarrAHancockP (2002) Art and aesthetics at work: An introduction. Tamara2(1): 1–7.
9.
ChampouxJ (2003) At the Movies: Organizational Behavior. Mason, OH: Southwestern.
10.
CiullaJ (2000) The Working Life: The Promise and Betrayal of Modern Work. New York: Random House.
11.
CleggSKornbergerMPitsisT (2008) Managing and Organizations. London: SAGE.
12.
CunliffeAShotterJ (2006) Linguistic artifacts in organizing and managing. In RafaeliAPrattM (eds) Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.119–140.
13.
CzarniawskaBGuillet de MonthouxP (1994) Good Novels, Better Management. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic.
14.
DarsoL (2005) International opportunities for artful learning. Journal of Business Strategy26(5): 58–61.
15.
De CiantisC (1995) Using Art Technique to Facilitate Leadership Development. Greensboro, NC: CCL Press.
16.
DeweyJ (1934) Art as Experience. New York: Milton, Balch, and Company.
17.
DeyPSteyaertC (2007) The troubadours of knowledge: Passion and invention in management education. Organization14(3): 437–461.
18.
ElsbachK (2006) Perceptual biases and misinterpretation of artifacts. In: RafaeliAPrattM (eds) Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.61–84.
19.
ErdenZvon KroghGNonakaI (2008) The quality of group tacit knowledge. Journal of Strategic Information Systems17(February): 4–18.
20.
GagliardiP (1996) Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. In: CleggSHardyCNordW (eds), Handbook of Organization Studies. London: SAGE, pp.565–580.
21.
GagliardiP (2006) Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. In: CleggSHardyCNordW (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies. 2nd edn.London: SAGE, pp.701–724.
22.
GagliardiP (2007) The collective repression of pathos. Organization14(3): 331–338.
23.
GallosJ (2009) Artful teaching: Using the visual, creative and performing arts in contemporary management education. In: ArmstrongSFukamiC (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Management Learning, Education and Development. London: SAGE, pp.187–212.
24.
GherardiS (1999) Learning as problem-driven or learning in the face of mystery. Organization Studies20(1): 103–123.
25.
GherardiS (2009) Practice? It’s a matter of taste. Management Learning40(5): 535–550.
26.
GherardiSNicoliniDStratiA (2007) The passion for knowing. Organization14(3): 315–329.
27.
GreeneM (2001) Variations on a Blue Guitar. New York: Columbia University and Teachers College Press.
28.
GreyC (2002) What are business schools for? On silence and voice in management education. Journal of Management Education6(5): 496–511.
29.
GreyC (2009) Licence to think. Management Learning40(4): 353–356.
30.
Guillet de MonthouxPStatlerM (2008) Aesthetic play as an organizing principle. In: BarryDHansenH (eds) The SAGE Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization. London: SAGE, pp.423–435.
31.
HansenHBathurstF (2011) Aesthetics and leadership. In: BrymanACollinsonDGrintK. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Leadership. London: SAGE, pp.255–266.
32.
KingI (2008) How we know what we know: The potentiality of art and aesthetics. In: BarryDHansenH (eds) The SAGE Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization. London: SAGE, pp.42–48.
33.
Knorr-CetinaK (2006) Post-humanist challenges to the human and social sciences. In: GagliardiPCzarniawskaB (eds) Management Education and Humanities. Cornwall: MPG, pp.233–245.
34.
KupersW (2002) The phenomenology of aesthetic organizing—Ways toward aesthetically responsive organizations. Consumption, Markets and Culture5(1): 21–46.
35.
LeavyP (2009) Method Meets Art. New York: Guilford Press.
MeisiekSHatchM (2008) This is work, this is play: Artful interventions and identity dynamics. In: BarryDHansenH (eds) The SAGE Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization. London: SAGE, pp.412–422.
38.
MinahanSWolfram-CoxJ (2007) The Aesthetic Turn in Management. Farnham: Ashgate.
39.
Nissley (2002) Arts-based learning in management education. In: WankelCDeFillippiR (eds) Rethinking Management for the 21st Century. Greenwich: IAP, pp.27–62.
40.
Nissley (2004) The ‘artful creation’ of positive anticipatory imagery in appreciative inquiry: Understanding appreciative inquiry as aesthetic discourse. Appreciative Inquiry1: 283–307.
41.
NissleyNPalusC (2003) Moving beyond the art of creative thinking. Focus: Bimonthly Newsletter of the American Creativity Association15(3): 1–3.
42.
OttensmeyerE (1996) Too strong to stop, too sweet to lose: Aesthetics as a way to know organizations. Organization3(2): 189–194.
43.
PhillipsN (1995) Telling organizational tales: The role of narrative fiction in the study of organizations. Organization Studies16(4): 625–648.
44.
SandelandsL (1998) Feeling and Form in Social Life. Lanham, MD: Roman and Littlefield.
45.
SerresMSchehrL (1982) The Parasite. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
46.
StratiA (1992) Aesthetic understanding of organizational life. Academy of Management Review17(3): 568–581.
47.
StratiA (1999) Organization and Aesthetics. London: SAGE.
48.
StratiA (2000) The aesthetic approach in organization studies. In: LinsteadSHöpflH (eds) The Aesthetics of Organization. London: SAGE, pp.13–34.
49.
StratiA (2003) Knowing in practice: Aesthetic understanding and tacit knowledge. In: NicoliniDGherardiSYanowD (eds) Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach. New York: ME Sharpe, pp53–75.
50.
StratiA (2006) Organizational artifacts and the aesthetic approach. In: RafaeliAPrattM (eds) Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.23–29.
51.
StratiA (2007a) Aesthetics in teaching organization studies. In: ReynoldsMVinceR (eds) The Handbook of Experiential Learning and Management Education. London: Oxford University Press, pp.70–86.
52.
StratiA (2007b) Sensations, impressions and reflections on the configuring of the aesthetic discourse in organizations. Aesthesis1(1): 14–22.
53.
StratiA (2007c) Sensible knowledge and practice-based learning. Management Learning38(1): 61–77.
54.
StratiA (2008) Aesthetics in the study of organizational life. In: BarryDHansenH (eds) The SAGE Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization. London: SAGE, pp.229–238.
55.
StratiA (2009) Do you do beautiful things? Aesthetics and art in qualitative methods of organizational studies. In: BuchananDABrymanA (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods. London: SAGE, pp.230–245.
56.
StratiA (2010) Aesthetic understanding of work and organizational life: Approaches and research developments. Sociology Compass4(10): 880–893.
57.
TaylorSSCarboniI (2008) Technique and practices from the arts. In: BarryDHansenH (eds) The SAGE Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization. London: SAGE, 220–228.
58.
TaylorSSHansenH (2005) Finding form: Looking at the field of organizational aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies42(6): 1211–1231.
59.
TaylorSSKaranianB (2008) Working connection: The relational art of leadership. Aesthesis2(2): 15–21.
60.
TaylorSSLadkinD (2009) Understanding arts-based methods in managerial development. Academy of Management Learning & Education8(1): 55–89.
61.
VinceRReynoldsM (2007) Introduction: Experiential learning and management education: Key themes and future directions. In: ReynoldsMVinceR (eds) The Handbook of Experiential Learning and Management Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1–18.
WarrenS (2008) Empirical challenges in organizational aesthetic research: Toward a sensuous methodology. Organization Studies29(4): 559–580.
64.
WeiskopfR (2002) Deconstructing ‘the iron cage’—Towards an aesthetic of folding. Consumption, Markets, and Culture5(1): 79–97.
65.
WelschMDehlerGMurrayD (2007) Learning about and through aesthetic experience: Understanding the power of experience-based education. In: ReynoldsMVinceR (eds) The Handbook of Experiential Learning and Management Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.53–69.
66.
WicksPRippinA (2010) An inquiry into art and leadership using dolls and doll making. Leadership6(3): 259–278.
67.
WitkinR (2009) The aesthetic imperative of a rational-technical machinery: A study in organizational control through the design of artifacts. Music and Arts in Action2(1): 56–68.
