In recent years, the topic of organizational practices has come to the fore in organization studies. A practice perspective is meant to provide a new method for studying organizations beyond the formal, quantifiable and abstract. But despite, or because of, its prominence the concept of practice has been used in a variety of ways and to evoke different associations. This article is intended to critically review the current approaches of practice-based studies in organizational analysis. The discussion shows that approaches that understand practice simply as `what actors do' are not unfolding much critical power in organization studies, as opposed to epistemic-normative conceptions of practice which open a non-cognitive, non-positivist and non-rationalist avenue in organizational analysis. In order to enrich our understanding of practices in organizations—particularly in circumstances of breakdowns and conflicting ethical values—a Habermasian conception of practice is introduced which distinguishes between life-world practices following a narrative mode of communication and discourses which are argumentative in nature.
Barley, S.R. (1996) `Technicians in the Workplace. Ethnographic Evidence for Bringing Work into Organization Studies', Administrative Science Quarterly41(3): 404-41.
2.
Barley, S.R. and Kunda, G. (2001) `Bringing Work Back In', Organization Science12(1): 76-95.
3.
Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T. (1967) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
4.
Bourdieu, P. (1972) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Bourdieu, P. (1987) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1991) `Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning and Innovation', Organization Science12(2): 40-57.
7.
Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (2001) `Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective', Organization Science12(2): 198-213.
8.
Carter, C., Clegg, S.M. and Kornberger, M. (2008) `Strategy as Practice?'Strategic Organization6(1): 83-99.
9.
Chia, R. and MacKay, B. (2007) `Post-Processual Challenges for the Emerging Strategy-As-Practice Perspective: Discovering Strategy in the Logic of Practice', Human Relations60(1): 217-42.
10.
Clegg, S.R., Courpasson, D. and Phillips, N. (2006) Power and Organizations. London : SAGE.
11.
Cook, S.D.N. and Yanow, D. (1993) `Culture and Organizational Learning', Journal of Management Inquiry2(4): 373-91.
12.
Cook, S.N. and Brown, J.S. (1999) `Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance Between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing', Organization Science10(4): 382-400.
13.
Corradi, J., Gherardi, S. and Verzelloni, L. (2008) `Ten Good Reasons for Assuming a `Practice Lens' in Organization Studies', paper presented at the OLKC Conference, University of Aarhus, Copenhagen, 28-30 April. (Available onle at http://olkc.net/)
14.
Dewey, J. (1922) Human Nature and Conduct. New York: Henry Holt.
15.
Elkjaer, B. (2004) `Organizational Learning: The Third Way', Management Learning35(4): 419-34.
16.
Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. and Punamäki, R. L., eds (1999) Perspectives on Activity Theory. Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
17.
Feldman, M. (2000) `Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change', Organization Science11(6): 611-29.
18.
Feldman, M. and Pentland, B.T. (2003) `Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change', Administrative Science Quarterly48(1): 94-118.
19.
Feldman, M. and Rafaeli, A. (2002) `Organizational Routines as Sources of Connections and Understandings', Journal of Management39(3): 309-31.
20.
Foucault, M. (1973) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Random House .
21.
Fox, S. (2006) `Inquiries of Every Imaginable Kind: Ethnomethodology, Practical Action and the New Situated Learning Theory', The Sociological Review54(3): 426-45.
22.
Gadamer, H.G. (1976) Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
Geiger, D. (2008) `The Dark Side of Narratives: Challenging the Epistemological Nature of Narrative Knowledge', International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy3(1): 66-81.
25.
Gergen, K.J. (1985) `The Social Constructionist Movement in Modern Psychology', American Psychologist40(3): 266-75.
26.
Gherardi, S. (2000) `Practice-Based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations', Organization7(2): 211-23.
27.
Gherardi, S. (2006) Organizational Knowledge. The Texture of Workplace Learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
28.
Gherardi, S. (2008) `Situated Knowledge and Situated Action: What Do Practice-Based Studies Promise?' in D. Barry and H. Hansen (eds) The SAGE Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization, pp. 516-25. London: SAGE.
29.
Gherardi, S. and Nicolini, D. (2000) `To Transfer is to Transform: The Circulation of Safety Knowledge', Organization7(2): 329-48.
30.
Gherardi, S. and Nicolini, D. (2002) `Learning in a constellation of Interconnected Practices: Canon or Dissonance?' Journal of Management Studies39(4): 419-36.
31.
Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D. and Strati, A. (2007) `The Passion for Knowing', Organization14(3): 315-29.
32.
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of a Theory of Structure. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1 Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston MA: Beacon Press.
34.
Habermas, J. (1986) Knowledge and Human Interests. Cambridge: Polity Press.
35.
Habermas, J. (1989) The Theory of Communicative Action Vol 2. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston MA: Beacon Press.
36.
Habermas, J. (1990) `Remarks on Discourse Ethics', in J. Habermas (ed) Justification and Application , pp. 19-111. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
Habermas, J. (2003) Truth and Justification. Cambridge : Polity Press.
39.
Jarzabkowski, P. (2004) `Strategy as Practice: Recursiveness, Adaptation, and Practice-In-Use', Organization Studies25(4): 529-60.
40.
Jarzabkowski, P. (2005) Strategy as Practice. London : SAGE.
41.
Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J. and Seidl, D. (2007) `Strategizing: The Challenges of a Practice Perspective' , Human Relations60(1): 5-27.
42.
Johnson, G., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2003) `Micro Strategy and Strategizing: Towards an Activity-Based View', Journal of Management Studies40(1): 3-22.
43.
Kamlah, W. and Lorenzen, P. (1984) Logical Propaedeutic: Pre-School of Reasonable Discourse. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
44.
Kellog, K.C., Orlikowski, W.J. and Yates, J. (2006) `Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations', Organization Science17(1): 22-44.
45.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E.C. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Lindblom, C.E. (1968) The Policy-Making Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
47.
Lounsbury, M. and Crumley, E.T. (2007) `New Practice Creation: An Institutional Perspective on Innovation', Organization Studies28(7): 993-1012.
48.
Lyotard, J.F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
49.
Marshall, N. (2008) `Cognitive and Practice-Based Theories of Organizational Knowledge and Learning: Incompatible or incomplete', Management Learning39(4): 413-35.
50.
Mintzberg, H. (1975) `The Manager's Job: Folklore and Fact', Harvard Business Review53: 49-61.
51.
Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. and Yanow, D., eds ( 2003) Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
52.
Orlikowski, W.J. (2002) `Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing', Organization Science13(3): 249-73.
53.
Orlikowski, W.J. and Schultze, U. (2004) `A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations: The Use of Internet-Based Self-Service Technologies', Information Systems Research15(1): 87-107.
54.
Orlikowski, W.J. and Yates, J. (1994) `Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations', Administrative Science Quarterly39(December): 541-74.
55.
Orr, J.E. (1996) Talking about Machines. An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
56.
Pentland, B.T. and Feldman, M. (2005) `Organizational Routines as a Unit of Analysis' , Industrial and Corporate Change14(5): 793-815.
57.
Polanyi, M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension. London : Routledge.
58.
Rouse, J. (2001) `Two Concepts of Practice', in T. R. Schatzki, K. D. Knorr-Cetina and E. von Savigny (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, pp. 189-98. London: Routledge.
59.
Schatzki, T.R. (2005) `The Site of Organizations', Organization Studies26(3): 465-84.
60.
Schatzki, T. R.,Knorr-Cetina, K. D. and von Savigny, E., eds (2001) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.
61.
Scherer, A.G. and Palazzo, G. (2007) `Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen From a Habermasian Perspective', Academy of Management Review32(4): 1096-120.
62.
Schreyögg, G. and Geiger, D. (2005) `Developing Organizational Narratives: A New Dimension in Knowledge Management', in B. Renzl , K. Matzler and H. Hinterhuber (eds) The Future of Knowledge Management , pp. 82-98. London: Palgrave.
63.
Schreyögg, G. and Geiger, D. (2007) `The Significance of Distinctiveness: A Proposal for Rethinking Organizational Knowledge', Organization14(1): 77-100.
64.
Schütz, A. and Luckmann, T. (1989) The Structures of the Life-World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
65.
Seidl, D. (2007) `General Strategy Concepts and the Ecology of Strategy Discourse: A Systemic-Discursive Perspective', Organization Studies28(2): 197-218.
66.
Strati, A. (1999) Organization and Aesthetics. London: SAGE.
67.
Strati, A. (2003) `Knowing in Practice: Aesthetic Understanding and Tacit Knowledge', in D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi and D. Yanow (eds) Knowing in Organizations, pp. 53-75. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
68.
Strati, A. (2007) `Sensible Knowledge and Practice-Based Learning' , Management Learning38(1): 61-77.
69.
Toulmin, S. (1958) The Uses of Argument. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
70.
Turner, S. (1994) The Social Theory of Practices. Cambridge: Polity Press.
71.
Whittington, R. (2006) `Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research' , Organization Studies27(5): 613-34.
72.
Whittington, R. (2007) `Strategy Practice and Strategy Process: Family Differences and the Sociological Eye', Organization Studies28(10): 1575-86.
73.
Yanow, D. (2000) `Seeing Organizational Learning: A Cultural View' , Organization7(2): 247-68.
