This article presents findings from longitudinal ethnographic research of a mega-project alliance. For five years we followed the leadership team of a large Australian Alliance Program made up of a large public and several private organizations, analyzing `practice' as novel patterns of interaction developed into predictable arrays of activities, changing and transforming while at the same time continuing to be referred to as `the same'. In this article we focus on three such arrays of activities: authoring boundaries, negotiating competencies and adapting materiality. We suggest that these are essential mechanisms in becoming a practice. While most studies of practice deal with already established practices, the significance of our research is that we develop a notion of practice as it unfolds. In this way we can provide a better account of the constant change inherent in practices.
Althusser, L. (1969) For Marx. London: Allen Lane.
2.
Blum A.F. and McHugh P. (1971) `The Social Ascription of Motives', American Sociological Review36: 98-109.
3.
Brunsson, N. (2002) The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations. Stockholm: Abstrakt forlag AS.
4.
Carlsen, A. (2006) `Organizational Becoming as Dialogic Imagination of Practice. The Case of the Indomitable Gauls', Organization Science17(1): 132-49.
5.
Clegg, S.R. (1975) Power, Rule and Domination. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
6.
Clegg, S.R., Kornberger, M. and Pitsis, T. (2008) Managing and Organizations (2nd edition). London: SAGE.
7.
Clegg, S.R., Pitsis, T.S., Rura-Polley, T. and Marosszeky, M. (2002) `Governmentality Matters: Designing an Alliance Culture of Inter-organizational Collaboration for Managing Projects', Organization Studies23(3): 317-37.
8.
DiMaggio, P. (1988) `Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory', in L. G. Zucker (ed.) Institutional Patterns and Organizations, pp.3-22. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
9.
Festinger, L. (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11.
Gherardi, S. and Nicolini, D. (2003) `To Transfer is to Transform: The Circulation of Safety Knowledge', in D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi and D. Yanow (eds) Knowing in Organizations. A Practice-Based Approach , pp. 204-24. London: M. E. Sharpe.
12.
Gomez, M.L., Bouty, I. and Drucker-Godard, C. (2003) `Developing Knowing in Practice, Behind the Scene of Haute Cuisine', in D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi, and D. Yanow (eds) Knowing in Organizations. A Practice-Based Approach, pp. 100-125. London: M. E. Sharpe.
13.
Habermas, J. (1979) Communication and the Evolution of Society (trans. Thomas McCarthy). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
14.
Håkonsen, G. (2007) `Making a Difference: Creative Dialogues, Protopractice and the Moral Shaping of Knowledge in a Media Company', doctoral thesis at NTNU, 2007:116Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Arts, Department of Interdisciplinary Studies of Culture.
15.
Keller, C. and Keller, J.D. (1993): `Thinking and Acting with Iron', in Chaiklin, S. and Lave, J. (eds) Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Kornberger, M., Clegg, S.R. and Rhodes, C. (2005) `Learning/Becoming/Organizing', Organization12(2): 147-67.
17.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
Mills, C.W. (2002 [1940]) `Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive', in S. R. Clegg (ed.) Central Currents in Organization Studies II: Contemporary Trends, Volume 6, pp. 183-92. London: SAGE (originally published in American Sociological Review5: 904-13).
19.
Munro, R. (2009 forthcoming) `Actor Network Theory', in S. R. Clegg and M. Haugaard (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Power. London : SAGE.
20.
Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. and Yanow, D. (2003) `Introduction: Toward a Practice Based view of Knowing and Learning in Organizations', in D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi, and D. Yanow (eds) Knowing in Organizations. A Practice-Based Approach, pp. 3-31. London: M. E. Sharpe.
21.
Orlikowski, W.J. and Hofman, J.D. (1997) `An Improvisational Model for Change Management: The Case of Groupware Technologies', Sloan Management Review38(2), winter: 11-21.
22.
Pitsis, T.S., Clegg, S.R., Marosszeky, M. and Rura-Polley, T. (2003) `Constructing the Olympic Dream: A Future Perfect Strategy of Project Management', Organization Science14(5): 574-90.
23.
Pitsis, T.S., Kornberger, M. and Clegg, S.R. (2004) `The Art of Managing Relationships in Interorganizational Collaboration', Management7(3): 47-67.
24.
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
Schatzki, T.R. (2001) `Introduction; Practice Theory', in T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina and E. von Savigny (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, pp. 1-14. London: Routledge.
26.
Schütz, A. (1967) The Phenomenology of the Social World (trans. G. Walsh and F. Lehnert). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
27.
Suchman, L. (2003) `Organization Alignment: the Case of Bridge Building' , in D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi and D. Yanow (eds) Knowing in Organizations. A Practice-Based Approach, pp. 187-203. London: M. E. Sharpe.
28.
Sullivan, W.Sullivan, R. and Buffton, B. (2001) `Aligning Individual and Organisational Values to Support Change', Journal of Change Management2(3): 247-54.
29.
Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (2002) `On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change', Organization Science13(5): 567-82.
30.
Weick, K.E. (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA and London: SAGE.
31.
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
33.
Yanow, D. (2003) `Seeing Organizational Learning: A "Cultural" View' , in D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi and D. Yanow (eds) Knowing in Organizations. A Practice-Based Approach, pp. 32-52. London: M.E. Sharpe.
