Public sector learning is often described as individualistic and operational. This article investigates an in-house MBA that was created explicitly to promote collective learning among managers in a UK local authority. The MBA was envisaged as an innovative programme and incorporated situated learning theory and reflective practice into its teaching and learning strategy. It failed, however, to achieve its aim and managers' learning remained focused on individual competencies. This is because the political context of a UK local authority is an impediment to collective learning. In particular, new public management initiatives such as `Best Value' and `Public Private Partnership' prevented collaboration between individual managers and departments.
Antonacopoulou, E. (2001) `The Paradoxical Nature of the Relationship Between Training and Learning', Journal of Management Studies38(3): 327-50.
2.
Ball, A., Broadbent, J. and Moore, C. (2002) `Best Value and the Control of Local Government: Challenges and Contradictions', Public Money and Management22(2): 9-16.
3.
Boyne, G.A., Gould-Williams, J.S., Law, J. and Walker, R.M. (2002) `Best Value-Total Quality Management for Local Government', Public Money and Management22(3): 9-16.
4.
Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1991) `Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning and Innovation', Organization Science2(1): 40-57.
5.
Chiva, R. and Alegre, J. (2005) `Organizational Learning and Organizational Knowing: Towards the Integration of Two Approaches', Management Learning36(1): 49-68.
6.
Common, R. (2004) `Organizational Learning in a Political Environment: Improving Policy-making in UK Government', Policy Studies25(1): 35-49.
7.
Currie, G. and Knights, D. (2003) `Reflecting on a Critical Pedagogy in MBA Education' , Management Learning34(1): 27-49.
8.
Department for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (1998) Modern Local Government: In Touch with the People. The Best Value White Paper. London: DETR.
9.
Dewey, J. (1933) How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking in the Educative Process. Boston: Heath.
10.
Elkjaer, B. (2001) `The Learning Organization: An Undelivered Promise' , Management Learning32(4): 437-52.
11.
Elkjaer, B. (2003) `Social Learning Theory: Learning as Participation in Social Process', in M. Easterby-Smith and M. Lyles (eds) The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, pp. 38-53. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
12.
Elkjaer, B. (2004) `Organizational Learning: The "Third Way"', Management Learning35(4): 419-34.
13.
Fournier, V. and Grey, C. (2000) `At the Critical Moment: Conditions and Prospects for Critical Management Studies', Human Relations53(1): 7-32.
14.
Friedman, V.J., Lipshitz, R. and Overmeer, W. (2001) `Creating Conditions for Organizational Learning' , in M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child and I. Nonaka, (eds) Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge, pp. 757-74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
Gherardi, S. (2000) `Practice-based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations', Organization7(2): 211-23.
16.
Gherardi, S. and Nicolini, D. (2002) `Learning in a Constellation of Interconnected Practices: Canon or Dissonance', Journal of Management Studies39(4): 419-36.
17.
Gnyawali, D.R. and Stewart, A.C. (2003) `A Contingency Perspective on Organizational Learning: Integrating Environmental Context, Organizational Learning Processes, and Types of Learning', Management Learning34(1): 63-89.
18.
Hagen, R., Miller, S. and Johnson, M. (2003) `The "Disruptive Consequences" of Introducing a Critical Management Perspective onto an MBA Programme: The Lecturers' View' , Management Learning34(2): 241-57.
19.
King, N. (2004) `Using Interviews in Qualitative Research' in C. Cassell and G. Symon (eds) Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, pp. 11-22. London: SAGE.
20.
Klijn, E.H. and Teisman, G.R. (2003) `Institutional and Strategic Barriers to Public- Private Partnership: An Analysis of Dutch Cases', Public Money and Management23(3): 137-46.
21.
LaPalombara, J. (2001) `Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons', in M. Dierkes , A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child and I. Nonaka , (eds) Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge , pp. 137-61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Marshall, C. and Rossman, G.B. (1995) Designing Qualitative Research. London: SAGE.
24.
Mintzberg, H. (2004) Managers Not MBAs: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development. San Francisco : Berrett-Koehler.
25.
Perriton, L. and Reynolds, M. (2004) `Critical Management Education: From Pedagogy of Possibility to Pedagogy of Refusal?', Management Learning35(1): 61-77.
26.
Rashman, L. and Radnor, Z. (2005) `Learning to Improve: Approaches to Improving Local Government Services', Public Money and Management25(1): 19-26.
27.
Vince, R. (2000) `Learning in Public Organizations in 2010', Public Money and Management January-March: 39-44.
28.
Vince, R. (2001) `Power and Emotion in Organizational Learning' , Human Relations54(10): 1325-51.
29.
Vince, R. (2002) `Organizing Reflection', Management Learning33(1): 63-78.
30.
Vince, R. and Broussine, M. (2000) `Rethinking Organizational Learning in Local Government' , Local Government Studies26(1): 15-30.
31.
Von Krogh, G. (2003) `Knowledge Sharing and the Communal Resource', in M. Easterby-Smith and M. Lyles (eds) The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, pp. 372-92. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
32.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1987) The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, R. W. Rieber and A. S. Carton (eds). New York: Plenum Press.
33.
Watson, T.J. (2001) `Beyond Managism: Negotiated Narratives and Critical Management Education in Practice', British Journal of Management12: 385-96.
