The literature on organization learning does not fully recognize the difference between learning that is primarily mediated by written documents and protocols and learning that occurs on the basis of verbal and symbolic interaction. This article presents a study of construction project workers and emphasizes that learning is emerging in work-life situations wherein individuals are sharing know-how and experiences through embodied interactions and the practical use of tools and machinery. Co-workers in construction projects thus make use of verbal and symbolic forms of communication in their processes of learning, rather than various forms of decoded and written forms and computer-mediated learning. The article suggests that the learning organization literature should pay more attention to communities of practice that rely on verbal interaction rather than written documentation.
Alvesson, M. (1994) ‘Talking in Organizations: Managing Identity and Impression in an Advertising Agency’ , Organization Studies15(4): 535-563 .
2.
Alvesson, M. (2003) ‘Beyond Neopositivists, Romantics, and Localists: A Reflexive Approach to Interviews in Organization Research’ , Academy of Management Journal28(1): 13-33 .
3.
Appelbaum, S. H. and Gellagher, J. (2000) ‘The Competitive Advantage of Organizational Learning’ , Journal of Workplace Learning12(2): 20-56 .
4.
Argyris, C. and Schön, D. A. (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
5.
Bain, A. (1998) ‘Social Defenses against Organizational Learning’ , Human Relations51(3): 413-429 .
6.
Bateson, G. (1979) Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unit. New York: E. P. Dutton .
7.
Baumard, P. (1999) Tacit Knowledge in Organizations. London: Sage .
8.
Boden, D. (1994) The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. Cambridge: Polity Press .
9.
Boisot, M. H. (1998) Knowledge Assets: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
10.
Bryans, P. and Smith, R. (2000) ‘Beyond Training: Reconceptualizing Learning at Work’ , Journal of Workplace Learning12(6): 228-235 .
11.
Callon, M. (2002) ‘Writing and (Re)writing Devices as Tools for Managing Complexity’, in J. Law and A. Mol (eds) Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices. Durham, NC: Duke University Press .
12.
Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990) ‘Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation’ , Administrative Science Quarterly35: 128-152 .
13.
Contu, A. , Grey, C. and Örtenblad, A. (2003) ‘Against Learning’ , Human Relations56(8): 931-952 .
14.
Contu, A. and Willmott, H. (2003) ‘Re-embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory’ , Organization Science14(3): 283-296 .
15.
Cook, S. D. and Yanow, D. (1993) ‘Culture and Organizational Learning’ , Journal of Management Inquiry2(4): 373-390 .
16.
Cooley, C. H. (1902/1964) Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Schocken Books .
17.
Culler, J. (2001) ‘Beyond Interpretation’, in Jonathan Culler The Pursuit of Signs. London: Routledge .
18.
Czarniawska, B. (2001) ‘Anthropology and Organizational Learning’, in M. Dierkes , A. Berthon , J. Child and I. Nonaka (eds) Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
19.
De Certeau, M. (1997) The Capture of Speech and Other Political Writings. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press .
20.
Denzin, N. K. (1994) ‘The Art and Politics of Interpretation’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage .
21.
Dodgson, M. (1993) ‘Organizational Learning: A Review of Some of the Literature’ , Organization Studies14(3): 373-394 .
22.
Donnellon, A. (1996) Team Talk: Listening Between the Lines to Improve Team Performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press .
23.
Driver, M. (2002) ‘The Learning Organization: Foucauldian gloom or Utopian Sunshine’ , Human Relations55(1): 33-53 .
24.
Dubois, A. and Gadde, L.-E. (2002) ‘The Construction Industry as a Loosely Coupled System: Implications for Productivity and Innovation’ , Construction Management and Economics20: 621-631 .
25.
Easterby-Smith, M. (1997) ‘Disciplines of Organizational Learning: Contributions and Critiques’ , Human Relations50(8): 1085-1113 .
26.
Eco, U. (1992) Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
27.
Eisenhardt, K. N. (1989) ‘Building Theories from Case Study Research’ , Academy of Management Review14(4): 532-550 .
28.
Feldman, M. S. (1995) Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
29.
Fine, G.-A. (1996) ‘Justifying Words: Occupational Rhetorics as Resources in Restaurant Kitchens’ , Administrative Science Quarterly41: 90-115 .
30.
Fiol, C. M. and Lyles, M. A. (1985) ‘Organizational Learning’ , Academy of Management Review10(4): 803-813 .
31.
Fontana, A. and Frey, J. H. (1994) ‘Interviewing’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage .
32.
Friedman, V. J. , Lipshitz, R. and Overmeer, W. (2001) ‘Creating Conditions for Organizational Learning’, in M. Dierkes , A. Berthon , J. Child and I. Nonaka (eds) Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
33.
Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall .
34.
Garrick, J. and Clegg, S. (2000) ‘Knowledge Work and the New Demands of Learning’ , Journal of Knowledge Management4(4): 279-286 .
35.
Gherardi, S. (2000) ‘Practice-based Theoretizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations’ , Organization7(2), 211-223 .
36.
Gherardi, S. and Nicolini, D. (2001) ‘The Sociological Foundations of Organizational Learning’, in M. Dierkes , A. Berthon , J. Child and I. Nonaka (eds) Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
37.
Goody, J. (1986) The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
38.
Granovetter, M.S. (1973) ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’ , American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360-1380 .
39.
Gunther McGrath, R. (2001) ‘Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity, and Managerial Oversight’ , Academy of Management Journal44(1): 118-131 .
40.
Hedberg, B. and Holmquist, M. (2001) ‘Learning in Imaginary Organizations’, in M. Dierkes , A. Berthon , J. Child and I. Nonaka (eds) Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
41.
Huber, G. P. (1991) ‘Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures’ , Organization Science2(1): 88-115 .
42.
Huzzard, T. (2000) ‘From Partnership to Resistance: Unions and Organizational Learning at Ericsson Infocom’ , Management Learning31(3): 353-373 .
43.
Huzzard, T. and Östergren, K. (2002) ‘When Norms Collide: Learning under Organizational Hypocrisy’ , British Journal of Management13: S47-S59 .
44.
Kadefors, A. (1995) ‘Instutions in Building Projects: Implications for Flexibility and Change’ , Scandinavian Journal of Management11(4): 395-408 .
45.
Knorr Cetina, K. D. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press .
46.
Kurland, N. B. and Pelled, L. H. (2000) ‘Passing the Word: Toward a Model of Gossip and Power in the Workplace’ , Academy of Management Review25(2): 428-438 .
47.
Kvale, S. (1996) InterViewing. London: Sage .
48.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
49.
Leidner, R. (1993) Fast Food, Fast Talk: Service Work and the Routinization of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press .
50.
Levinthal, D. A. and March, J. G. (1993) ‘The Myopia of Learning’ , Strategic Management Journal14: 95-112 .
51.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1992) Tristes tropiques. Harmondsworth: Penguin .
52.
Lipshitz, R. and Popper, M. (2000) ‘Organizational Learning in a Hospital’ , Journal of Applied Behavioral Science36(3): 345-361 .
53.
Luhmann, N. (1995) Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
54.
Lynch, M. (1985) Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science. A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul .
55.
Lynch, M. (2002) ‘Protocols, Practices and the Reproduction of Technique in Molecular Biology’ , British Journal of Sociology53(2): 203-220 .
56.
McLuhan, M. (1962) The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul .
57.
March, J. G. (1991) ‘Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning’ , Organization Science2(1): 71-87 .
58.
March, J. G. and Simon, H. A. (1958) Organizations, 2nd edn.Oxford: Blackwell .
59.
Mead, G. H. (1934), Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
60.
Michelson, G. and Mouly, S. (2000) ‘Rumour and Gossip in Organisations: A Conceptual Study’ , Management Decision38(5): 339-346 .
61.
Nevil, E. C. , DiBella, A. J. and Gould, J. M. (1995) ‘Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems’ , Sloan Management Review (Winter): 73-85 .
62.
Ong, W. J. (1982) Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Routledge .
63.
Orr, J. E. (1996) Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press .
64.
Pawlowsky, P. , Forslin, J. and Reinhardt, R. (2001) ‘Practices and Tools of Organizational Learning’, in M Dierkes , A. Berthon , J. Child and I. Nonaka (eds) Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
65.
Polanyi, M. (1958) Personal Knowledge: Toward a Post-critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
66.
Prichard, C. (2000) ‘Know, Learn, Share! The Knowledge Phenomena and the Construction of a Consumptive-Communicative Body’, in C. Prichard , R. Hull , M. Chumer and H. Willmott (eds) Managing Knowledge: Critical Investigations of Work and Learning. New York: St Martin’s Press .
67.
Selen, W. (2000) ‘Knowledge Management in Resource-based Competitive Environments: A Roadmap for Building Learning Organizations’ , Journal of Knowledge Management4(4): 346-353 .
68.
Silverman, D. (1993) Interpreting Qualitative Data. London: Sage .
69.
Sole, D. and Edmondson, A. (2002) ‘Situated Knowledge and Learning in Disperse Teams’ , British Journal of Management13: S17-S34 .
70.
Sontag, S. (1966) ‘Against Interpretation’, in Susan Sontag Against Interpretation and Other Essays. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux .
71.
Stake, R. E. (1996) The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
72.
Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research. London: Sage .
73.
Tosey, P. (1999) ‘The Peer Learning Community: A Contextual Design for Learning?’ , Management Decision37(5): 403-410 .
74.
Tranfield, D. , Duberley, J. , Smith, S. , Musson, G. and Stokes, P. (2000) ‘Organisational Learning—It’s Just Routine!’ , Management Decision37(4): 253-260 .
75.
Traweek, S. (1988) Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
76.
Vakola, M. and Rezgui, Y. (2000) ‘Organizational Learning and Innovation in the Construction Industry’ , The Learning Organization7(4): 174-183 .
77.
Weick, K. E. (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing. New York: McGraw-Hill .
78.
Weick, K. E. and Westley, F. (1999) ‘Organizational Learning: Affirming an Oxymoron’, in S. R. Clegg , C. Hardy and W. R. Nord (eds) Managing Organizations. London: Sage .
79.
Wenger, E. (2000) ‘Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems’ , Organization7(2), 225-246 .
80.
Wenger, E. , McDermott, R. and Snyder, W. M. (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press .
81.
Winter, S. (2000) ‘The Satisficing Principle in Capability Learning’ , Strategic Management Journal21: 981-996 .
82.
Woicehyn, J. (2000) ‘Technology Adoption: Organizational Learning in Oil Firms’ , Organization Studies21(6): 1095-1118 .
83.
Yin, R. K. (1994) Case Study Design and Methods. London: Sage .
