Our paper examines issues of epistemology, power and culture with respect to their impact upon the use of information and communication technology (ICT) to manage knowledge within an organization. Utilizing an empirical case study of a global pharmaceutical company, in which the implementation of an intranet failed to meet aspirations of the Chief Executive that employees freely share knowledge, we encourage academics and practitioners to reflect more critically upon the limits to technology in pursuit of knowledge management. Our study illustrates that ‘technical fixes’ to knowledge management issues merely harden existing practices and routines, rather than open up new directions. In particular, broader organizational issues of power and culture may mean that employees are unwilling or unable to share knowledge and, beyond the epistemological problem, this is likely to further inhibit the contribution of ICT to the management of knowledge.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alvesson, M. (1993) ‘Organization as Rhetoric: Knowledge-Intensive Companies and the Struggle with Ambiguity’ , Journal of Management Studies30(6): 997–1015 .
2.
Alvesson, M. (1995) Management of Knowledge-Intensive Companies. Berlin: de Gruyter .
3.
Alvesson, M. and Karreman, D. (2001) ‘Odd Couple: Making Sense of the Curious Concept of Knowledge Management’ , Journal of Management Studies38(7): 995–1018 .
4.
Blackler, F. (1995) ‘Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation’ , Organization Studies16(6): 1021–1046 .
5.
Blackler, F., Reed, M. and Whitaker, A. (1993) ‘Editorial, Knowledge and the Theory of Organisations’ , Journal of Management Studies30(6): 851–861 .
6.
Blackler, F., Crump, N. and McDonald, S. (1998) ‘Knowledge, Organisations and Competition’, in G. Kroght, J. Roos and D. Kleine (eds) Knowing in Firms: Understanding, Managing and Measuring Knowledge. London: Sage .
7.
Blackler, F., Crump, N. and McDonald, S. (1999) ‘Organisational Learning and Organisational Forgetting’, in M. Easterby-Smith, J. Burgoyne and L. Araujo (eds) Organisational Learning and the Learning Organisation: Developments in Theory and Practice. London: Sage .
8.
Boland, R. and Schultze, U. (1996) ‘Narrating Accountability: Cognition and the Production of the Accountable Self’, in R. Munro and J. Mouritson (eds) Accountability, Power, Ethos and the Technologies of Managing. London: Thomson International .
9.
Boland, R. and Tenkasi, R. V. (1995) ‘Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Communities of Knowing’ , Organization Science6(4): 350–363 .
10.
Boot, R., Laurence, J. and Morris, J. (1994) Managing the Unknown. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill .
11.
Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (1998) ‘Organizing Knowledge’ , California Management Review40(3): 90–111 .
12.
Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (1991) ‘Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning and Innovation’ , Organization Science2(1): 40–57 .
13.
Button, G., Coulter, J., Lee, J. and Sharrock, W. (1995) Computers, Minds and Conduct. Cambridge: Polity Press .
14.
Chumer, M., Hull, R. and Prichard, C. (2000) ‘Introduction: Situating Discussions about “Knowledge”’, in C. Pritchard, R. Hull, M. Chumer and H. Willmott (eds) Managing Knowledge: Critical Investigations of Work and Learning. Basingstoke: MacMillan .
15.
Cook, S. and Brown, J. (1999) ‘Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing’ , Organization Science10(4): 381–400 .
16.
Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L. (1998) Working Knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press .
17.
Davenport, T. H., Eccles, R. G. and Prusak, L. (1992) ‘Information Politics’ , Sloan Management Review14 (Autumn): 67–81
18.
Dewey, J. (1934) Art as Experience. New York: Perigree Books .
19.
Dreyfus, H. L. and Dreyfus, S. E. (1986) Mind over Machine. New York: Free Press .
20.
Drucker, P. (1993) Post-Capitalist Society. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann .
21.
Fahey, L. and Prusak, L. (1998) ‘The Eleven Deadliest Sins of Knowledge Management’ , California Management Review40(3): 265–276 .
22.
Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Allen Lane .
23.
Fuller, S. (2001) Knowledge Management Foundations. London: Butterworth-Heinemann .
24.
Gates, B. (1999) Business @ the Speed of Thought. London: Penguin Books .
25.
Hansen, M. T., Norhia, N. and Tierney, T. (1999) ‘What’s Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge?’ , Harvard Business Review77(2): 106–116
26.
Hayes, N. (2001) ‘Boundless and Bounded Interactions in the Knowledge Work Process: The Role of Groupware Technologies’ , Information and Organization11: 79–101 .
27.
Hayes, N. and Walsham, G. (2000) ‘Safe Enclaves, Political Enclaves and Knowledge Working’, in C. Pritchard, R. Hull, M. Chumer and H. Willmott (eds) Managing Knowledge: Critical Investigations of Work and Learning. Basingstoke: MacMillan .
28.
Hickman, L. (1990) John Dewey’s Pragmatic Technology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press .
29.
Hislop, D. (2001). ‘Mission Impossible? Communicating and Sharing Knowledge via Information Technology’ , Managing Knowledge: Conversations and Critiques Conference, Leicester University.
30.
Hull, R. (2000) ‘Knowledge Management and the Conduct of Expert Labour’, in C. Pritchard, R. Hull, M. Chumer and H. Willmott (eds), Managing Knowledge: Critical Investigations of Work and Learning. Basingstoke: MacMillan .
31.
Kanter, R. (1990) When Giants Learn to Dance. New York: Simon and Schuster .
32.
Knights, D., Murray, F. and Willmott, H. (1993) ‘Networking as Knowledge Work: A Study of Strategic Interorganizational Development in the Financial Services Industry’ , Journal of Management Studies30(6): 975–996 .
Kreiner, K. (1999) ‘Knowledge and Mind’ , Advances in Management Cognition and Organizational Information Processing6: 1–29 .
35.
Kristoffersen, S. and Ljungberg, F. (1998) ‘MobiCom: Networking Dispersed Groups’ , Interacting with Computers10: 45–65 .
36.
Kunda, G. (1992) Engineering Culture and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press .
37.
Larsen, S. (1986) ‘Information Can Be Transmitted but Knowledge Must Be Induced’ , Programmed Learning and Educational Technology23(4): 331–336 .
38.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
39.
Lehner, F. (1990) ‘Expert Systems for Organizational and Managerial Tasks’ , Information and Management23(1): 31–41 .
40.
Leonard, D. and Sensiper, S. (1998) ‘The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation , California Management Review40(3): 112–132 .
41.
Lesser, E. and Prusak, L. (2000) ‘Communities of Practice, Social Capital and Organizational Knowledge’, in E. L. Lesser, M. A. Fontaine and J. A. Slusher (eds) Knowledge and Communities. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann .
42.
MacKinlay, A. (2000) ‘The Bearable Lightness of Control: Organizational Reflexivity and the Politics of Knowledge Management’ in C. Prichard, R. Hull, M. Chumer and H. Willmott (eds), Managing Knowledge: Critical Investigations of Work and Learning. Basingstoke: MacMillan .
43.
MacKinlay, A. (2002) ‘The Limits of Knowledge Management’ , New Technology, Work and Employment17(2): 76–88 .
44.
Martin, J., Sitkin, S. and Boehm, M. (1985) ‘Founders and the Elusiveness of a Cultural Legacy’, in P. J. Frost et al. (eds) Organizational Culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
45.
McAdam, R. and McCreedy, S. (2000) ‘A Critique of Knowledge Management: Using a Social Constructionist Model’ , New Technology, Work and Employment15(2): 155–168 .
46.
McDermott, R. (1999) ‘Why IT Inspired but Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management’ , California Management Review41(4): 103–117 .
47.
Meyerson, D. E. (1991) ‘Acknowledging and Uncovering Ambiguities in Cultures’, in P. J. Frost, L. F. Moore, M. R. Louis, C. C. Lundberg and J. Martin (eds) Reframing Organizational Culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
48.
Milton, N.Shadbolt, N.Cottam, H. and Hammersley, M. (1999) ‘Towards a Knowledge Technology for Knowledge Management’ , International Journal of Human–Computer Studies51: 615–641 .
49.
Mueller, F. and Dyerson, R. (1999) ‘Expert Humans or Expert Organizations?’ , Organization Studies20(2): 225–256 .
50.
Nahapiet, J. and Ghosal, S. (1998) ‘Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage’ , Academy of Management Review23(2): 242–266 .
51.
Newell, S., Scarbrough, H. and Swan, J. (2001) ‘From Global Knowledge to Internal Electronic Fences: Contradictory Outcomes of Intranet Development’ , British Journal of Management12: 97–111 .
52.
Nonaka, I. (1994) ‘A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation’ , Organization Science5(1): 14–37
53.
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
54.
O’Dell, C. and Grayson, J. (1998) ‘If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Best Practices’ , California Management Review40(3): 80–88 .
55.
Orr, J. E. (1990) ‘Sharing Knowledge, Celebrating Identity: Community Memory in a Service Culture’, in D. Middleton and D. Edwards (eds) Collective Remembering. London: Sage .
56.
Polanyi, M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday .
57.
Rheingold, H. (1993) The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. New York: Addison-Wesley .
58.
Roos, J. and von Krogh, G. (1996) ‘The Epistemological Challenge: Managing Knowledge and Intellectual Capital’ , European Management Journal14(4): 333–337 .
59.
Rorty, R. (1982) Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press .
60.
Ruggles, R. (1998) ‘The State of the Notion: Knowledge Management in Practice’ , California Management Review40(3): 80–89 .
61.
Senge, P. (1990) The Fifth Discipline: Mastering the Five Practices of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday .
62.
Swan, J. and Scarbrough, H. (2001) ‘Knowledge Management: Concepts and Controversies’ , Journal of Management Studies38(7): 913–921 .
63.
Terrett, A. (1998) ‘Knowledge Management and the Law Firm’ , Journal of Knowledge Management2(1): 67–76 .
64.
Tsoukas, H. (1996) ‘The Firm as a Distributed Knowledge System: A Constructionist Approach’ , Strategic Management Journal17: 11–25 .
65.
Tsoukas, H. (1998) ‘Forms of Knowledge and Forms of Life in Organized Contexts’, in C. H. R. Chia (ed.) In the Realm of Organization. London: Routledge .
66.
Tsoukas, H. and Vladimirou, E. (2001) ‘What is Organizational Knowledge?’ , Journal of Management Studies38(7): 973–993 .
67.
van Baalen, P. J. and Moratis, L. T. (2001) Management Education in the Network Economy: Its Context, Content and Organization. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers .
68.
Warhurst, P. and Thompson, P. (1998) ‘Hands, Hearts and Minds: Changing Work and Workers at the End of the Century’, in P. Thompson and C. Warhurst (eds) Workplace of the Future. London: MacMillan .
69.
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
70.
Wenger, E. (2000) ‘Communities of Practice: The Key to Knowledge Strategy’, in E. L. Lesser, M. A. Fontaine and J. A. Slusher (eds) Knowledge and Communities. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann .
71.
Willmott, H. (1995) ‘The Odd Couple?: Re-engineering Business Processes; Managing Human Relations’ , New Technology, Work and Employment10(2): 89–98 .
72.
Willmott, H. (2000) ‘From Knowledge to Learning’, in R. Hull, M. Chumer and H. Willmott (eds) Managing Knowledge: Critical Investigations of Work and Learning. Basingstoke: MacMillan .
73.
Yin, R. K. (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage .
