In this paper we suggest that it is important in management education to work with the defensive dynamics in learning groups. Through a consideration of the dynamics within complex systems, we argue that the ways in which these defensive dynamics are worked with may determine the levels of learning attained. This work requires a recognition that defensive dynamics within groups can limit learning, an awareness of the nature of such dynamics, and skill in adopting appropriate strategies in relation to them. Both staff and learners can contribute to this work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agazarian, Y. M. (1994) `The Phases of Group Development and the Systems-Centred Group', in V. L. Schermer and M. Pines (eds) Ring of Fire: Primitive Affects and Object Relations in Group Psychotherapy, pp. 36-85. London: Routledge.
2.
Agazarian, Y. M. (1997) Systems-Centered Therapy for Groups. New York: Guilford Press.
Bateson, G. (1980) Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. London: Fontana.
5.
Bickford, D. J. and van Vleck, J. (1997) `Reflections on Artful Teaching', Journal of Management Education21 (4): 448-472.
6.
Bion, W. R. (1961) Experiences in Groups. London: Tavistock.
7.
Colman, A. D. and Geller, M. H. (1985) Group Relations Reader 2. Washington, DC: A.K. Rice Institute.
8.
Dehler, G. E. and Welsh, M. A (1997) `Discovering the Keys: Spirit in Teaching and the Journey of Learning', Journal of Management Education21 (4): 496-508.
9.
Easterby-Smith, M. (1986) Evaluation of Management, Education, Training and Development. Aldershot: Gower.
10.
French, R. (1997) `The Teacher as Container of Anxiety: Psychoanalysis and the Role of Teacher', Journal of Management Education21 (4): 483-495.
11.
French, R. and Grey, C. (eds) (1996) Rethinking Management Education. London: Sage.
12.
Heron, J. (1999) The Complete Facilitator's Handbook. London: Kogan Page.
13.
Isaacs, W. N. (1993) `Taking Flight: Dialogue, Collective Thinking, and Organizational Learning', Organizational Dynamics22(2): 24-39.
14.
Knights, B. (1995) `Group Processes in Higher Education: The Uses of Theory', Studies in Higher Education20 (2): 135-146.
15.
Lawrence, W. G. , Bain, A. and Gould, L. (1996) `The Fifth Basic Assumption', Free Associations6(1), No. 37: 28-55.
16.
Levy, D. (1994) `Chaos Theory and Strategy: Theory, Application, and Managerial Implications', Strategic Management Journal15 (Special Issue: Summer): 167-178.
17.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
18.
Menzies Lyth, I. E. P. (1990) `Social Systems as a Defense against Anxiety' (rev.), in E. Trist and H. Murray (eds) The Social Engagement of Social Science, Vol. 1. London: Free Association Books.
19.
Nitsun, M. (1996) The Anti-Group. London: Routledge.
20.
Raab, N. (1997) `Becoming an Expert in Not Knowing. Reframing Teacher as Consultant', Management Learning28 (2): 161-175.
21.
Ramsay, S. (1999) `After the Conference is Over', in R. French and R. Vince (eds) Group Relations, Management, and Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
Reason, P. (1994) Participation in Human Inquiry. London: Sage.
23.
Salzberger-Wittenberg, I. , Henry, G. and Osborne, E. (1983) The Emotional Experience of Learning and Teaching. London: Routledge.
24.
Schein, E. H. (1993) `On Dialogue, Culture and Organizational Learning', Organizational Dynamics22 (2): 40-51.
25.
Senge, P. (1990) The Fifth Discipline. New York: Doubleday.
26.
Stacey, R. D. (1996) Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics. London: Pitman.
27.
Vince, R. and Martin, L. (1993) `Inside Action Learning: An Exploration of the Psychology and Politics of the Action Learning Model', Management Education and Development24(3): 205-215.
