Abstract

Sandra Sousa, in The Life and Writings of Maria Teresa de Sá Nogueira, undertakes an important work of historiographical and archival recovery by rescuing the trajectory of a figure largely absent from dominant narratives of Portuguese colonialism, African liberation movements, and Lusophone journalism. The book combines intellectual biography, oral history, documentary editing, and translation, offering readers not only a reconstruction of the life of Maria Teresa de Sá Nogueira (1936–2002) but also an extensive corpus of her journalistic writings produced in Mozambique and Brazil.
The book’s principal contribution lies precisely in this act of recovering a feminist and anti-colonial archive. As the author argues, Teresa Sá Nogueira was one of the first professional women journalists in Mozambique, actively involved in the intellectual and political circles that preceded the country’s independence, and contributing to newspapers such as A Tribuna, Notícias, Voz de Moçambique, and Brado Africano. Her trajectory intersects with some of the most significant moments in the history of the Lusophone world during the 20th century: the Estado Novo dictatorship in Portugal (1933–1974), the African liberation struggles, political exile in Brazil—then under a military dictatorship (1964–1985), a fact that is notably underexplored in the book—the Carnation Revolution in Portugal (1974), and the process of Mozambican independence.
One of the book’s greatest strengths is its ability to demonstrate the contemporary relevance of Teresa de Sá Nogueira’s writings. The collected articles reveal an author deeply committed to issues of social justice, children’s rights, women’s emancipation, racism, colonialism, and structural inequalities. Particularly compelling is the way Sandra Sousa identifies, within the selected texts, a feminist sensibility that connects gender-based oppression with racial and colonial hierarchies. In addition to exposing the constraints imposed by patriarchal norms, and long before the concept of intersectionality became widely established, Teresa de Sá Nogueira denounced the exploitation of child labour, the exclusion of Black women from educational opportunities, and the ways in which oppression is intensified among disadvantaged social groups.
Another significant merit of the book is the inclusion of English translations of the original Portuguese texts. This decision considerably broadens the work’s international reach, enabling scholars in postcolonial studies, feminist studies, and Lusophone studies to engage with material that has hitherto remained largely unknown. At the same time, preserving the original texts respects the historicity and linguistic texture of Teresa de Sá Nogueira’s writing.
The first part of the book (Chapters 1 and 2—The Life of Maria Teresa de Sá Nogueira) provides a relatively brief biographical contextualisation, based primarily on interviews with the journalist’s son, Vítor Tomás, and with José Luís Cabaço. These sources are valuable, although the reliance on personal testimonies means that some passages adopt a more memorialistic than strictly historiographical tone; this is not, in itself, a weakness. Some readers may, however, miss a more extensive archival investigation that could corroborate, challenge, or complement these memories.
At times, Sandra Sousa appears more concerned with demonstrating the value of oral history and, particularly, postmemory as a valid theoretical framework than with critically examining the experience of a woman situated within a specific historical, social, and political context. As a result, the complexities of the post-independence period in Mozambique are not adequately situated within the broader context of the Cold War, the anti-apartheid struggles in South Africa, or the wider political dynamics of Southern Africa and the world during the 1970s and 1980s. Consequently, the political analysis remains somewhat superficial. It is not entirely clear what the author means by “trauma,” nor how she understands its causes, which seem to be reduced to a rather simplified—albeit effective—interpretation centred on the betrayal of the revolutionary ideals of those who fought for the country’s independence and subsequently assumed positions of political power.
Similarly, the texts are presented primarily as evidence of an advanced political consciousness rather than examined for their ambiguities and contradictions. The book prioritises the recovery of a historical figure, which is both understandable and necessary, but at times this comes at the expense of more rigorous critical engagement. For instance, the analysis could have explored the tensions inherent in Teresa de Sá Nogueira’s position within structures of racial and social privilege as the daughter of a highly privileged white Portuguese family who broke with the values of her milieu and aligned herself with anti-colonial movements. Daniel F. Silva’s foreword hints at these complexities, but the main body of the book does not always develop them in a sufficiently critical manner.
The second part of the book (Chapters 3, 4, and 5—The Writings of Maria Teresa de Sá Nogueira) consists of texts written by Maria Teresa de Sá Nogueira which, according to Sandra Sousa, best represent the author’s enduring concerns and the distinctiveness of her journalistic voice. This section of the book is particularly engaging and rewarding to read.
Following a chronological structure, Chapter 3, which comprises texts published in A Tribuna (1963–1964), is the most substantial and politically rich section of the book. It brings together a selection of articles published in this progressive newspaper based in Lourenço Marques (now Maputo), during the early years of the colonial war. The principal themes include the condition of marginalised children and young people, including institutionalised minors, child labour, and social exclusion; the situation of women, particularly Black women, advocating access to education and criticising traditional gender roles; racism and colonial inequalities, although often addressed indirectly due to the constraints of censorship; criticism of conservative social norms and machismo, frequently expressed through irony and satire; and the social and ethical responsibilities of citizens, emphasising the need for solidarity with the most vulnerable groups.
Chapter 4 presents texts published in Revista Tempo (1971–1973). Although a shorter chapter, it is distinguished by a series of interviews conducted in Brazil during Teresa de Sá Nogueira’s period of exile. Sandra Sousa selects two interviews that she considers particularly significant: one with Jorge Amado and another with Gilberto Gil. These remarkable conversations explore themes such as the role of the writer and the artist in society; the relationship between culture, politics, and social commitment; Brazilian identity, particularly its Afro-Brazilian foundations; the tensions between artistic creation and political engagement in authoritarian contexts; and broader reflections on freedom, democracy, and social transformation. More than simple interviews, these texts demonstrate Nogueira’s ability to situate her interlocutors within wider debates on culture, inequality, and political resistance. The chapter reveals a mature journalist, capable of engaging in dialogue with some of the most important figures in 20th-century Brazilian culture.
The final documentary section corresponds to the period immediately following the Carnation Revolution of 25 April 1974. In Chapter 5, the texts published in Jornal da Bahia (1974) reflect the immense expectations generated by the end of the Portuguese dictatorship and by the transformations then unfolding in Portugal and its African colonies. The central themes include the Revolution of 25 April 1974 and its historical significance; the construction of Portuguese democracy after decades of dictatorship; the end of Portuguese colonialism; the hopes and uncertainties surrounding the independence of the African colonies; testimonies from Portuguese emigrants in Brazil regarding the impact of the revolution; and reflections on political freedom, democratic participation, and social change. The chapter serves as an almost real-time record of Portugal’s transition to democracy, revealing how the journalist interpreted these events from her position in exile in Brazil. Her writing combines political enthusiasm with a critical awareness of the challenges that Portugal faced at that pivotal historical moment.
The Life and Writings of Maria Teresa de Sá Nogueira constitute a highly significant contribution to the study of Portuguese colonialism, Lusophone feminisms, and the history of journalism. The book does more than fill a historiographical gap; it challenges the very criteria by which certain subjects are remembered while others are forgotten. By recovering the voice of Teresa Sá Nogueira, Sandra Sousa participates in a broader process of building feminist and anti-colonial archives, demonstrating that the memory of political struggles can no longer remain centred exclusively on male figures. Ultimately, the book’s greatest value lies in its act of archival recovery and reactivation. Its most important achievement is to bring into circulation a body of texts and experiences that challenge national boundaries, connecting Portugal, Mozambique, and Brazil within a transnational history of resistance to colonialism, fascism, and patriarchy. For this reason, it is particularly recommended for scholars of postcolonial studies, contemporary history, feminist studies, and cultural memory.
Footnotes
Funding
The author disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was funded by F.C.T.—Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P, Portugal, developed within the scope of the project 2023.08077.CEECIND.
