Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

‘Women-protective’ language is broadly used as a frame in political discussions on women’s reproductive healthcare and labour rights. This article addresses the use of ‘women-protective’ language in online news articles in the Latvian media about the proposed prohibition of oocyte donation for nulliparous women. The main focus of the recent Latvian debate has not been on the technology itself, but rather on the female body and women’s rationality and decision-making capacity. The results of the analysis show that use of the ‘women-protective’ frame positions women as victims, increases control over the female body and restricts women’s rights to make autonomous decisions. The application of this frame is especially dangerous when used by politicians as it may lead to the legal restriction of women’s rights.

Keywords

Assisted reproduction gender oocyte donation political debate public debate ‘women-protective’ language

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

(2015) The bad mother: stigma, abortion and surrogacy. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43(2): 179–191.

Appleton

(2011) Reproduction and regret. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 23(2): 225–333.

Bracewell-Milnes

, et al. (2016) Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: A systematic review. Human Reproduction Update 22(4): 450–465.

Butler

(1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

Council of Europe (1997) Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Available at: www.old.ms.md/_files/8977–1.pdf (accessed 9 September 2017).

Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights (2017) Women’s sexual and reproductive health and rights in Europe. Issue Paper. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/women-s-sexual-and-reproductive-health-and-rights-in-europe-issue-pape/168076dead (accessed 20 June 2018).

D’Sa

(1987) Women’s rights in relation to human rights: A lawyer’s perspective. Commonwealth Law Bulletin 13(2): 666–676.

Flick

(2014) An Introduction to Qualitative Research, 5th edn. London: Sage.

Jesudason

Weitz

(2015) Eggs and ABORTION: ‘Women-protective’ language used by opponents in legislative debates over reproductive health. The Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43(2): 259–269.

10.

Kirejczyk

(2008) On women, egg cells and embryos: Gender in the regulatory debates on embryonic research in the Netherlands. European Journal of Women’s Studies 15(4): 377–391.

11.

Lakoff

(2004) Don’t Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate: The Essential Guide for Progressives. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.

12.

Lakoff

Johnson

(1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

13.

Mohapatra

(2015) False framings: The co-opting of sex-selection by the anti-abortion movement. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43(2): 270–274.

14.

Neri

Turillazzi E, Pascale N , et al. (2016) Egg production and donation: A new frontier in the global landscape of cross-border reproductive care: Ethical concerns. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology 17(4): 316–320.

15.

Siegel

(2007) The new politics of abortion: An equality analysis of woman-protective abortion restrictions. University of Illinois Law Review 3: 991–1054.

16.

Sifris

(2013) Reproductive Freedom, Torture and International Human Rights: Challenging the Masculinisation of Torture. New York: Routledge.

17.

Smith

(2015) Contraceptive comstockery: Reasoning from immorality to illness in the twenty-first century. Connecticut Law Review 47(4): 971–1023.

18.

Söderström-Anttila

Miettinen A, Rotkirch A , et al. (2016) Short- and long-term health consequences and current satisfaction levels for altruistic anonymous, identity-release and known oocyte donors. Human Reproduction 31(3): 597–606.

19.

Spilker

Lie

(2007) Gender and bioethics intertwined: Egg donation within the context of equal opportunities. European Journal of Women’s Studies 14(4): 327–340.

20.

Weiss

(1998) Conversations with Feminism: Political Theory and Practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

‘Women-protective’ language as a tool of exclusion: Debates on oocyte donation in Latvia

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References