After the cultural turn, it has become necessary to reconsider society’s relations to nature. This article provides a theoretically sound basis for feminist interventions in global environmental policies drawing on feminist economics and queer ecologies to theorize material(ist) perspectives on gender and nature. This is the starting point for rethinking social and gender relations to nature from the resource politics approach. Beyond the feminization of environmental responsibility this approach aims at an understanding of human life embedded in material and discursive processes – without putting the potential (re)productivity of the female body on the ideological pedestal of heterosexual maternity.
AgarwalB (1992) The gender and environment debate: Lessons from India. Feminist Studies18(1): 119–158.
2.
AlaimoS (2010) Eluding capture: The science, culture, and pleasure of ‘queer animals’. In: Mortimer-SandilandsCEricksonB (eds) Queer Ecologies. Sex, Nature, Politics, Desire. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 51–72.
3.
AlaimoSHekmanS (2008a) Introduction: Emerging models of materiality in feminist theory. In: AlaimoSHekmanS (eds) Material Feminisms. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 1–19.
4.
AlaimoSHekmanS (eds) (2008b) Material Feminisms. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
5.
AppsP (2003) Gender, time use and models of the household. IZA Discussion paper series, No. 796. Available at: hdl.handle.net/10419/20041; July20th, 2012.
6.
BagemihlB (1999) Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity. New York: St Martin’s Press.
7.
BakkerI (1994) The Strategic Silence: Gender and Economic Policy. London: Zed Books.
8.
BalzerIWächterM (eds) (2002) Sozial-ökologische Forschung. Ergebnisse der Sondierungsprojekte aus dem BMBF-Förderschwerpunkt. Munich: oekom.
9.
BaradK (1998) Agential realism: Feminist interventions in understanding scientific practices. In: BiagioloM (ed.) The Science Studies Reader. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 1–11.
10.
BaradK (2008) Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. In: AlaimoSHekmanS (eds) Material Feminisms. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 120–154. (Reprinted from Signs 28(3), (2003): 801–831.)
11.
BauhardtC (2009) Ressourcenpolitik und Geschlechtergerechtigkeit. Probleme lokaler und globaler Governance am Beispiel Wasser. Prokla39(3): 391–405.
12.
BauhardtC (2012) Klimawandel und Infrastrukturpolitiken im Widerstreit. Die Politikfelder Wasser und Mobilität aus einer kritischen Gender-Perspektive. In: ÇağlarGDo Mar Castro VarelaMSchwenkenH (eds) Geschlecht – Macht – Klima. Feministische Perspektiven auf Klima, gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse und Gerechtigkeit. Opladen and Farmington Hills: Verlag Barbara Budrich, pp. 97–113.
13.
BauhardtCÇağlarG (eds) (2010) Gender and Economics: Feministische Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
14.
BeneríaL (2003) Gender, Development, and Globalization: Economics as if All People Mattered. New York and London: Routledge.
15.
BennettVZwarteveenM (2005) The connection between gender and water management. In: BennettVDávila-PobleteSNieves RicoM (eds) Opposing Currents: The Politics of Water and Gender in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 13–29.
16.
BFSFJ and Stat BA. (Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend and Statistisches Bundesamt) (eds) (2003) Wo bleibt die Zeit? Die Zeitverwendung der Bevölkerung in Deutschland 2001/02. Bonn: Wiesbaden.
17.
BieseckerAHofmeisterS (2006) Die Neuerfindung des Ökonomischen. Ein (re)produktionstheoretischer Beitrag zur Sozialen Ökologie. Munich: oekom.
18.
BieseckerAHofmeisterS (2010a) Im Fokus: Das (Re)Produktive. Die Neubestimmung des Ökonomischen mithilfe der Kategorie (Re)Produktivität. In: BauhardtCÇağlarG (eds) Gender and Economics: Feministische Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 51–80.
19.
BieseckerAHofmeisterS (2010b) Focus: (Re)productivity. Sustainable relations both between society and nature and between the genders. Ecological Economics69(8): 1703–1711.
20.
BieseckerAMathesMSchönSScurrellB (eds) (2000). Vorsorgendes Wirtschaften. Auf dem Weg zu einer Ökonomie des Guten Lebens. Bielefeld: Kleine.
21.
BraidottiRCharkiewiczEHäuslerSWieringaS (1994) Women, the Environment and Sustainable Development: Towards a Theoretical Synthesis. London: Zed Books.
22.
BrethertonC (2003) Movements, networks, hierarchies: A gender perspective on global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics3(2): 103–119.
23.
Brú BistuerJAguëra CaboM (2004) A gendered politics of the environment. In: StaeheliLAKofmanEPeakeLJ (eds) Mapping Women, Making Politics: Feminist Perspectives on Political Geography. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 209–225.
24.
Buckingham-HatfieldS (2000) Gender and Environment. New York and London: Routledge.
25.
BudlenderD (2007) A Critical Review of Selected Time Use Surveys: Gender and Development Programme Paper Number 2. Geneva: UNRISD.
CarrascoCRecioAA (2001) Time, work and gender in Spain. Time and Society10(2): 277–301.
29.
DalyM (1978) Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism. London: The Women’s Press.
30.
FerberMANelsonJA (eds) (1993) Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
31.
FerberMANelsonJA (eds) (2003) Feminist Economics Today: Beyond Economic Man. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
32.
HarawayD (2003) The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm.
33.
HarrisLM (2006) Irrigation, gender, and social geographies of the changing waterscapes of southeastern Anatolia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space24(2): 187–213.
34.
HarrisLM (2008) Water rich, resource poor: Intersections of gender, poverty, and vulnerability in newly irrigated areas of southeastern Turkey. World Development36(12): 2643–2662.
35.
HekmanS (2008) Constructing the ballast: An ontology for feminism. In: AlaimoSHekmanS (eds) Material Feminisms. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 85–119.
36.
Holland-CunzB (1994) Soziales Subjekt Natur. Natur- und Geschlechterverhältnis in emanzipatorischen politischen Theorien. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
JoshiDFawcettB (2005) The role of water in an unequal social order in India. In: ColesAWallaceT (eds) Gender, Water and Development. Oxford and New York: Berg, pp. 39–56.
39.
KingY (1990) Healing the wounds: Feminism, ecology, and the nature/culture dualism. In: DiamondIOrensteinGF (eds) Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, pp. 106–121.
40.
McGinnityFRussellH (2008) Gender Inequalities in Time Use: The Distribution of Caring, Housework and Employment Among Women and Men in Ireland. Dublin: The Equality Authority and the Economic and Social Research Institute
41.
MadörinM (2006) Plädoyer für eine eigenständige Theorie der Care-Ökonomie. In: NiechojTTullneyM (eds) Geschlechterverhältnisse in der Ökonomie. Marburg: Metropolis, pp. 277–297.
42.
MadörinM (2010) Care Ökonomie – eine Herausforderung für die Wirtschaftswissenschaften. In: BauhardtCÇağlarG (eds) Gender and Economics: Feministische Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 81–104.
43.
MellorM (1997) Feminism and Ecology. New York: New York University Press.
44.
MellorM (2001) Nature, gender and the body. In: NebelungAPoferlandASchultzI (eds) Geschlechterverhältnisse – Naturverhältnisse. Feministische Auseinandersetzungen und Perspektiven der Umweltsoziologie. Opladen: Leske and Budrich, pp. 121–139.
45.
MellorM (2005) Ecofeminist political economy: Integrating feminist economics and ecological economics. Feminist Economics11(3): 120–126.
46.
MerchantC (1996) Earthcare: Women and the Environment. New York and London: Routledge.
47.
MiesMShivaV (1993) Ecofeminism. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Fernwood.
48.
Mortimer-SandilandsCEricksonB (2010a) Introduction: A genealogy of queer ecologies. In: Mortimer-SandilandsCEricksonB (eds) Queer Ecologies: Sex, Nature, Politics, Desire. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 1–47.
49.
Mortimer-SandilandsCEricksonB (eds) (2010b) Queer Ecologies: Sex, Nature, Politics, Desire. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
50.
NebelungAPoferlASchultzI (eds) (2001) Geschlechterverhältnisse – Naturverhältnisse. Feministische Auseinandersetzungen und Perspektiven der Umweltsoziologie. Opladen: Leske and Budrich.
51.
OECD (2011) Towards Green Growth. Paris: OECD Publishing.
52.
OECD, World Bank and UN (2012) Incorporating green growth and sustainable development policies into structural reform agendas. A report prepared for the G20 Summit, Los Cabos, June 2012. Available at: www.oecd.org/document/10/0,3746,en_2649_37465_44076170_1_1_1_37465,00.html (accessed 20 July 2012).
53.
PetersonVS (2003) A Critical Rewriting of Global Political Economy: Integrating Reproductive, Productive and Virtual Economies. New York and London: Routledge.
54.
PlumwoodV (1993) Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. New York and London: Routledge.
55.
RoughgardenJ (2004) Evolution’s Rainbow: Diversity, Gender, and Sexuality in Nature and People. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
56.
SchäferMSchultzIWendorfG (eds) (2006) Gender-Perspektiven in der Sozial-ökologischen Forschung. Munich: oekom.
57.
SchultzI (ed.) (1993) GlobalHaushalt. Globalisierung von Stoffströmen – Feminisierung von Verantwortung. Frankfurt am Main: IKO.
58.
SchultzIWellerI (eds) (1995) Gender and Environment: Ökologie und die Gestaltungsmacht der Frauen. Frankfurt am Main: IKO.
59.
SturgeonN (2010) Penguin family values: The nature of planetary environmental reproductive justice. In: Mortimer-SandilandsCEricksonB (eds) Queer Ecologies: Sex, Nature, Politics, Desire. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 102–133.
WellerI (2004) Nachhaltigkeit und Gender. Neue Perspektiven für die Gestaltung und Nutzung von Produkten. Munich: oekom.
62.
WellerIHoffmannEHofmeisterS (eds) (1999) Nachhaltigkeit und Feminismus: Neue Perspektiven – Alte Blockaden. Bielefeld: Kleine.
63.
WichterichC (1992) Die Erde bemuttern. Frauen und Ökologie nach dem Erdgipfel in Rio. Berichte, Analysen, Dokumente. Cologne: Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung.
64.
Women’s Major Group United Nations Rio+20 Summit (2012) RIO+20: From the future we want to the future we need. Women’s Major Group Final Statement on the Outcomes of Rio+20. Available at: www.wedo.org (accessed 20 July 2012).
