BBC, 1984, Opinions of Television Output: Satisfaction with Channels and Program Population, BBC Broadcasting Research Department, Special Report, July, London.
2.
BlumlerJ.G., 1991, ‘In pursuit of program range & quality’, Studies in Broadcasting, 27, 191–206.
3.
Broadcasting Research Unit (BRU)1989, Quality in Television: Programs, Program-makers, Systems. John Libbey, London.
4.
BrunsdonC., 1990, Quality in Television’, Screen, Vol 31, No 1.
5.
CunninghamS., 1992, ‘A Policy Primer for our Times’, Media Information Australia, No 63, 33–42.
6.
CollardR., 1989, Total Quality Success ‘Through People, Institute of Personnel Management, London.
7.
DaviesA.SpurgeonC., 1992, ‘The Broadcasting Services Act: A reconciliation of public interest and marker principles of regulation’, Media Information Australia, No 66, 85–92.
8.
GreenbergB.S.AlbertR.BusselleR.La RoseR.LitmanB., 1991, ‘Production, technological, economic and audience factors in assessing quality in public service television’, Studies in Broadcasting, 27, 133–190.
9.
GreenbergB.S.BusselleR., 1991, Quality from the Audience Perspective, Departmenr of Telecommunications, Michigan State University.
10.
GreenbergB.S.BusselleR., 1992, Audience Dimensions of Quality in Situation Comedies & Action Programs, Dept of Tele-communications, Michigan State University.
11.
GunterB., 1986, ‘Come on down: A report of the popular appeal of TV quiz & game shows’, Airwaves: Quarterly Journal of the IBA, Spring.
12.
GunterB.ClemensJ.WoberM., 1992, ‘Defining television quality through audience reaction measures’ in Proceedings Symposium, 1–3 June, 1992, Toronto, Canada.
13.
GunterB.McLaughlinC., 1992, Television: The Public's View, John Libbey, London.
14.
GunterB.SvennevigM., 1988, Behind and In Front of the Screen: Television's Involvement with Family Life, John Libbey, London.
15.
GunterB.WoberM., 1992, The Reactive Viewer, John Libbey, London.
16.
IshikawaS., 1991, ‘The assessment of quality in broadcasting Research in Japan’Studies in Broadcasting, 27, 7–12.
17.
LealandG.BattellD., 1985, Audience Research in New Zealand Radio and Television: 1984, BCNZ, Wellington.
18.
LeggattT., 1991, ‘Identifying the indefinable: An essay on approaches to assessing quality in television in the UK’, Studies in Broadcasting, 27, 113–132.
19.
MillersonG., 1985, The Technique of Television Production, 11th ed, Focal Press, London.
20.
MillsP., 1990, Measuring Television Audiences: How Viewers Assess Programs, Broadcasting Research Unit, London.
21.
MulganG., 1990, The Question of Quality: The Broadcasting Debate6, BFI, London.
22.
PetersT.J.WatermanR.H.Jr, 1992, In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies, Harper and Row, New York.
23.
Public Broadcasting Service, 1987, Qualitative ratings report of a National Survey conducted by Television Audience Assessment, Inc, Public Broadcasting Service, Public Broadcasting Service, Alexandria, VA.
24.
SmithD.L., 1991, Video Communication: Structuring Content for Maximum Effectiveness. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
25.
SvennevigM.MorrisonD., 1990Quality in Television, IBA, London.
26.
Television Research Centre of Canada, 1989, Media in Canada: A public opinion survey, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Toronto.
27.
TowlerR., 1985, ‘The problem of channel image’, Airwaves: Quarterly Journal of the IBA, Winter, 22–23.
28.
WoberM., 1990, The Assessment of Television Quality, Independent Broadcasting Authority, Research Paper, July, London.
29.
WurtzelA.AckerS., 1989, Television Production, 3rd ed, McGraw-Hill, New York.
30.
ZettleH., 1990, Sight, Sound, Motion: Applied Media Aesthetics, 2nd ed, Wordsworth, Belmont, CA.