Metaphors structure not only language but also thought, making them central to multimodal discourse, particularly in political cartoons. This paper examines how cartoonists used multimodal metaphors to depict Donald Trump during his first month as the 47th U.S. president, a key period for shaping public and media perceptions. A qualitative analysis of 25 cartoons from cartoonmovement.com, grounded in Conceptual Metaphor Theory, revealed recurring source domains such as TRUMP AS A CHILD, PET, SPOUSE, and PUPPET. These metaphors reflect deeper conceptual structures that portray Trump as dependent, manipulated, or irresponsible, undermining his agency and leadership. The study offers an account of the attitudes toward the second Trump presidency as reflected in political cartoons, a communicative medium widely recognized in research for its capacity to register and convey public sentiments on a broad range of socio-political issues. The research contributes to cognitive approaches to multimodal communication by a) showing how political cartoons use entrenched metaphors to make abstract political relations comprehensible, b) tracing how visual metaphors build on verbal ones, and c) demonstrating how multimodal strategies influence audience judgments and ideological positions.
Abdel-RaheemA (2016) Mostafa Houssien’s Satan’s family: conceptual blending in a post-coup Egypt editorial cartoon. Metaphor and the Social World6(2): 304–325.
2.
Abdel-RaheemA (2018) Pictorial framing in moral politics: A corpus-based experimental study. Routledge.
3.
Abdel-RaheemA (2019) Visual recycling and intertextuality: a neurocognitive perspective. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science3: 1–19.
4.
Abdel-RaheemA (2020a) Moral metaphor and gender in Arab visual culture: debunking Western myths. Social Semiotics30(5): 715–742.
5.
Abdel-Raheem A (2020b) How to do things with images: The editor, the cartoonist, and the reader. Intercultural Pragmatics 17: 77–108.
6.
Abdel-RaheemA (2021) The multimodal recycling machine: toward a cognitive-pragmatic theory of the text/image production. Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics12(3): 207–239.
7.
Abdel-RaheemA (2022) Metaphorical creativity contributing to multimodal impoliteness in political cartoons. Intercultural Pragmatics19(1): 35–70.
8.
Abdel-RaheemA (2023) Where COVID metaphors come from: reconsidering context and modality in metaphor. Social Semiotics33(5): 971–1010.
9.
BarkerM (2024) Throw your voice: Suspended animations in Kazakhstani childhoods. Cornell University Press.
10.
BarkerMIantaffiAGuptaC (2014) Kinky clients, kinky counselling?: The challenges and potentials of BDSM. In: Feeling Queer or Queer Feelings?Routledge, 106–124.
11.
BellS (2004) Drawing Tony. The Guardian.
12.
BenczesRSzelidV (2022) Visual metaphors, Vol. 124. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
13.
BenoitWLKlyukovskiAA, McHale J, et al. (2001) A fantasy theme analy sis of political cartoons on the Clinton-Lewinsky-Starr affair. Critical Studies in Media Communication18(4): 377–394.
14.
BernárdezE (2008) Collective cognition and individual activity: Variation, language and culture. In: ZiemkeTZlatevJFrankRM (eds) Body, Language and Mind (Vol. 2). Mouton de Gruyter, 137–166.
15.
Bort-MirLBolognesiM (2022) Reliability in the identification of metaphors in (filmic) multimodal communication. Multimodal Communication11(3): 187–201.
16.
BounegruLForcevilleC (2011) Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication10(2): 209–229.
17.
CarlLM (1970) Political cartoons: “Ink Blots” of the editorial page. Journal of Popular Culture4: 39–45.
18.
ChabanNBainJStatsK (2006) Political Frankenstein’ or ‘Fiscal Gargantua’: metaphors of personification in the Australasian news reports of the EU enlargement. Proceedings of Ural State Pedagogical University19: 76–94.
19.
Charteris-Black J (2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Royaume-ni: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
20.
Charteris-BlackJ (2011) Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor, 2nd ed.Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
ChiltonP (2004) Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge.
22.
ConnersJ (2005) Visual representations of the 2004 presidential campaign. Political cartoons and popular culture references. American Behavioral Scientist49(3): 479–487.
23.
ConnersJ (2017) Party animals of the 2016 presidential primaries: political cartoon representations of the Republican and Democratic parties. American Behavioral Scientist61(6): 600–610.
24.
ConnersJL (2010) Barack vs. Hillary: race, gender and political cartoon imagery of the 2008 presidential primaries. American Behavioral Scientist54: 298–312.
25.
CoulsonS (2003) Reasoning and rhetoric: Conceptual blending in political and religious rhetoric. In: OleksyELewandowska-TomaszczykB (eds) Research and Scholarship in Integration Processes. Lodz, Poland: Lodz University Press, 59–88.
26.
DemjénZHardakerC (2016) Metaphor, impoliteness, and offence in online communication. In: SeminoEDemjénZ (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language. Routledge, 371–386.
27.
DeSousaMAMedhurstMJ (1982) Political cartoons and American culture: significant symbols of campaign 1980. Studies in Visual Communication8: 84–97.
28.
DueckG (2001) Views of knowledge are human views. IBM Systems Journal40(4): 885–888.
29.
ĐurovićT (2017) Multimodalnost i migrantska kriza u dnevnoj štampi na srpskom jeziku [multimodality and the migrant crisis in Serbian newspaper cartoons]. TemeXLI(2): 371–390.
30.
ÐurovićTSilaškiN (2016) Multimodality and the construal of reality in political cartoons: the case of Serbia-EU relationship. Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature14(2): 117–128.
31.
DuusP (2001) Presidential address: weapons of the weak, weapons of the strong—the development of the Japanese political cartoon. The Journal of Asian Studies60(4): 965–997.
32.
EdwardsJL (2001) Running in the shadows in campaign 2000: candidate metaphors in editorial cartoons. American Behavioral Scientist44(12): 2140–2151.
33.
EdwardsJL (2007) Drawing politics in pink and blue. PS: Political Science and Politics40: 249–253.
34.
El RefaieE (2003) Understanding visual metaphor: the example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication2(1): 75–95.
35.
El RefaieE (2003) Understanding visual metaphor: the example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication2(1): 75–95.
36.
El RefaieE (2009a) Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In: ForcevilleCJUrios-AparisiE (eds) Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 173–196.
37.
El RefaieE (2009b) Multiliteracies: how readers interpret political cartoons. Visual Communication8(2): 181–205.
38.
El RefaieE (2015) Reconsidering “image metaphor” in the light of perceptual simulation theory. Metaphor and Symbol30(1): 63–76.
39.
El RefaieE (2019) Visual metaphor and embodiment in graphic illness narratives. Oxford University Press.
40.
El RefaieEHörschelmannK (2010) Young people's readings of a political cartoon and the concept of multimodal literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education31(2): 195–207.
41.
EmN (2024) 100 reasons why.
42.
FieldingH (1997) Miscellanies, Vol. 3. Oxford University Press.
43.
ForcevilleC (1996) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. Routledge.
44.
ForcevilleC (2005) Addressing an audience: time, place, and genre in Peter Van Straaten’s calendar cartoons. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research18(3).
45.
ForcevilleC (2020) Visual and multimodal communication: Applying the relevance principle. Oxford University Press.
46.
ForcevilleC (2024) Identifying and interpreting visual and multimodal metaphor in commercials and feature films. Metaphor and Symbol 39(1): 40–54.
47.
ForcevilleCVan de LaarN (2019) Metaphors portraying right-wing politician geert wilders in Dutch political cartoons. In: KaalBHajerIMarijnissenH (eds) Populist Discourse. Routledge, 292–308.
48.
ForcevilleCJ (2009) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitive framework: Agendas for research. In: ForcevilleCJUrios-AparisiE (eds) Multimodal Metaphor. Mouton de Gruyter, 19–44.
49.
ForcevilleCJUrios-AparisiE (eds) (2009) Multimodal metaphor, Vol. 11. Walter de Gruyter.
50.
FreelandEP (2025) Ready or not, here he comes: Some thoughts on the second Trump administration. Survey Research Center, Princeton University.
51.
GarberM (2008) Profiling Shakespeare. Taylor & Francis.
52.
GeeraertsD (2016) The sociosemiotic commitment. Cognitive Linguistics27(4): 527–542.
53.
GibbsRW (1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press.
54.
GroarkeL (2017) Editorial cartoons and ART: Arguing with pinocchio. In: KiššJLArguellesCP (eds) Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in media Genres. John Benjamins, 81–110.
55.
HartCLukešD (eds) (2009) Cognitive linguistics in critical discourse analysis: Application and theory. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
56.
HinesC (1999) Rebaking the pie: The woman as dessert metaphor. In: BucholtzMLiangACSuttonLA (eds) Reinventing Identities: The Gendered Self in Discourse. Oxford University Press, 145–162.
57.
IsaacN (2024) Trump unyielding: The quest for America’s 47th presidency. BIZMART HOLDINGS LLC.
58.
JimohGA (2011) The role of editorial cartoons in the democratisation process in Nigeria: A study of selected works of three Nigerian cartoonists. Universal-Publishers.
59.
JohnsonIS (1937) Cartoons. Public Opinion Quarterly1(3): 21–44.
60.
JohnsonM (1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.
61.
KampkaAMolek-KozakowskaK (2024) Televised political satire in Poland: Historical roots and social implications of stereotypical representations of politicians and politics. In: MaalejE (eds) Communicating Political Humor in the media: How Culture Influences Satire and Irony. Springer Nature Singapore, 165–181.
62.
Kelley-RomanoSWestgateV (2007) Blaming Bush: an analysis of political cartoons following Hurricane Katrina. Journalism Studies8: 755–773.
63.
KhalilH (2025) Zelensky says Trump living in Russian disinformation space. The Guardian.
64.
KövecsesZ (2002) Metaphor. Oxford University Press.
65.
KövecsesZ (2010) A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics21(4): 663–697.
66.
KressGvan LeeuwenT (2006) Reading images: The grammar of visual design, 2nd ed.Routledge.
67.
KuczynskiL (eds) (2003) Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations. Sage Publications.
68.
LakoffGChiltonP (1995) Foreign policy by metaphor. Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf. Retrieved from https://www2.iath.virginia.edu.
69.
LakoffGJohnsonM (1980) The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science4(2): 195–208.
70.
LakoffGTurnerM (1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. University of Chicago Press.
71.
LangackerRW (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites, Vol. 1. Stanford University Press.
72.
LeechGN (2014) The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.
73.
MakindePO (2024) A multimodal metaphorical representation of selected political cartoons in Nigeria. Scholars International Journal of Linguistics and Literature7(10): 300–315.
74.
Marín-ArreseJI (2005) Humour as subversion in political cartooning. Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis: 1–22.
75.
MedhurstMJDeSousaMA (1981) Political cartoons as rhetorical form: a taxonomy of graphic discourse. Communication Monographs48: 197–236.
76.
Muelas-GilM (2018) Manuela Romano and M. Dolores Porto (Eds.), Exploring discourse strategies in social and cognitive interaction. Language and Cognition10(1): 186–192.
77.
MusolffA (2004) Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe, Vol. 14. Palgrave Macmillan.
78.
MusolffA (2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol21(1): 23–38.
79.
MusolffA (2016) Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. Bloomsbury Academic.
80.
MusolffAPaganiGMacArthurF (2014) Metaphor and intercultural communication. Royaume-Uni: Bloomsbury Publishing.
81.
NaiAMartínez i ComaFMaierJ (2019) Donald Trump, populism, and the age of extremes: comparing the personality traits and campaigning styles of Trump and other leaders worldwide. Presidential Studies Quarterly49(3): 609–643.
82.
Robins-EarlyN (2025) How the world’s richest man laid waste the US government. The Guardian.
83.
RomanoM (ed) (2024) Metaphor in socio-political contexts: Current crises, Vol. 54. Walter de Gruyter.
84.
Rudzka-OstynB (1988) Topics in Cognitive Linguistics. Pays-Bas: J. Benjamins.
85.
Ruiz de Mendoza IbáñezFJPérez HernándezL (2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor: myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol26(3): 161–185.
86.
SazidaHFadillahR (2023) An analysis of Donald Trump’s speech on national security and terrorism in the wake of Orlando massacre. International Journal of Research and Review10(12): 415–423.
87.
SilaškiNĐurovićT (2014) One step forward, two steps back: Conceptualizing Serbia’s EU accession in Serbian and EU discourse. In: HartCCapP (eds) Metaphor and Intercultural Communication. Bloomsbury, 167–184.
88.
SilaškiNĐurovićT (2019) The journey metaphor in Brexit-related political cartoons. Discourse, Context & Media31: 100318.
89.
Soares da SilvaACuencaMJRomanoM (2017) The conceptualisation of austerity in the Portuguese, Spanish and Irish press. In: SharifianF (eds) Advances in Cultural Linguistics. Springer, 345–368.
90.
SweetserE (1990) From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure, Vol. 54. Cambridge University Press.
91.
TalmyL (1988) Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive science12(1): 49–100.
92.
TurleyELButtT (2015) BDSM—Bondage and discipline; dominance and submission; sadism and masochism. In: RichardsDBarkerC (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the Psychology of Sexuality and Gender. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 24–41.
93.
ValdiviaP (2019) Narrating crises and populism in Southern Europe: regimes of metaphor. Journal of European Studies49(3–4): 282–301.
94.
Van DijkTA (2014) Discourse-cognition-society: Current state and prospects of the socio-cognitive approach to discourse. In: HartCCapP (eds) Contemporary Studies in Critical Discourse Analysis. Bloomsbury, 121–146.
ZhangCForcevilleC (2020) Metaphor and metonymy in Chinese and American political cartoons (2018–2019) about the Sino-US trade conflict. Pragmatics & Cognition27(2): 474–499.
