Streamers are recognized as engaging in emotional labor, yet research into the emotional labor of streamers in the emerging player knockout (PK) livestreaming format is limited. Based on the theory of emotional labor, this study conducted semistructured interviews with Chinese PK streamers (N = 18, aged 18–34), focusing on distinct forms of emotional labor and the side effects of high-intensity emotional labor. The findings indicated that PK streamers’ emotional labor could be categorized into three types: (1) focused on the PK streaming process, (2) maintaining viewer relationships, and (3) self-emotional regulation. Side effects included low social recognition, emotional exhaustion, and identity confusion. Livestreaming platforms and multichannel network companies may be intensifying these side effects through implicit or explicit control over the labor process. The current findings detail the intricacies of emotional labor in the emerging sphere of PK livestreaming.
AlthusserL (1971) Lenin and philosophy and other essays. London: Aakar Books.
2.
AngTWeiSAnazaNA (2018) Livestreaming vs pre-recorded: how social viewing strategies impact consumers’ viewing experiences and behavioral intentions. European Journal of Marketing52(9/10): 2075–2104.
3.
AshforthBEKreinerGE (1999) How can you do it?”: dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity. Academy of Management Review24(3): 413–434.
4.
BarthesR (1977) Image-music-text, trans. Stephen Heath, vol. 146. New York: Hill and Wang. 1977.
5.
BaymNK (2015) Connect with your audience! The relational labor of connection. The Communication Review18(1): 14–22.
6.
BeckerGS (1976) The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
7.
BowlbyJ (1982) Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry52(4): 664.
8.
BrownDHayesN (2008) Influencer marketing. New York: Routledge.
9.
BuchananI (2007) Deleuze and the internet. Australian Humanities Review43: 1–19.
10.
BurgessJGreenJ (2018) YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.
11.
CaiZChongAYLLimET, et al. (2021) Enemies or friends?: Disentangling the role of rivalry in encouraging virtual gifting in live streaming PK events. In: Proceedings of the 29th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Atlanta: Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 1841.
12.
ChambersD (2013) Social media and personal relationships: Online intimacies and networked friendship. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
ChenSWangHYangS, et al. (2024) Burnout among Chinese live streamers: prevalence and correlates. PLOS ONE19(5): e0301984.
14.
CollinsR (2004) Interaction ritual chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
15.
CottinghamMD (2016) Theorizing emotional capital. Theory and Society45: 451–470.
16.
CouldryNMejiasUA (2019) The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
17.
CraigDLinJCunninghamS (2021) Wanghong as social media entertainment in China. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
CunninghamSCraigD (2019) Social media entertainment: The new intersection of Hollywood and Silicon Valley, vol. 7. New York: NYU Press.
19.
CunninghamSCraigDLvJ (2019) China’s livestreaming industry: platforms, politics, and precarity. International Journal of Cultural Studies22(6): 719–736.
20.
DuffyBE (2016) The romance of work: gender and aspirational labour in the digital culture industries. International Journal of Cultural Studies19(4): 441–457.
21.
DurkheimE (1995) The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press.
22.
FestingerL (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
FongSY (2024) They don’t need us: affective precarity and critique in transnational media work from the margins of cultural China. Media, Culture & Society46(7): 1327–1343.
24.
FreudenbergerHJ (1974) Staff burn-out. Journal of Social Issues30(1): 159–165.
25.
GallettaACrossWE (2013) Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. New York: NYU Press.
26.
GoffmanE (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Harmondsworth.
27.
GoffmanE (1963) Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.
28.
GuJ (2024) Making Nüzhubo: Commodified intimacy and gendered labour in Chinese live/life streaming. In: Working Women on Screen: Paid Labour and Fourth Wave Feminism. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 99–121.
29.
HallS (1996) Who needs ‘identity?’. In: HallSDu GayP (eds) Questions of Cultural Identity. London: Sage, 1–17.
30.
HamiltonWAGarretsonOKerneA (2014) Streaming on Twitch: Fostering participatory communities of play within live mixed media. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 1315–1324. April.
31.
Hilvert-BruceZNeillJTSjöblomM, et al. (2018) Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on Twitch. Computers in Human Behavior84: 58–67.
32.
HochschildAR (1983) The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
HuMZhangMWangY (2017) Why do audiences choose to keep watching on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework. Computers in Human Behavior75: 594–606.
34.
JerslevA (2016) Media times in the time of the microcelebrity: celebrification and the YouTuber Zoella. International Journal of Communication10: 19.
35.
JohnsonMR (2021) Behind the streams: the off-camera labour of game live streaming. Games and Culture16(8): 1001–1020.
36.
LiJGuiXKouY, et al. (2019) Live streaming as co-performance: dynamics between center and periphery in theatrical engagement. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction3(CSCW): 1–22.
37.
LinJ (2023) Chinese creator economies: Labor and bilateral creative workers. New York: NYU Press.
38.
LuZXiaHHeoS, et al. (2018) You watch, you give, and you engage: A study of live streaming practices in China. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 1–13.
39.
MacdonaldCLSirianniC, eds. (1996) Working in the service society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
40.
MarshallPD (2010) The promotion and presentation of the self: celebrity as marker of presentational media. Celebrity Studies1(1): 35–48.
41.
MarwickAE (2013) Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age. New Haven: Yale University Press.
42.
MarwickAE (2015) You may know me from YouTube: (micro-) celebrity in social media. In: A Companion to Celebrity: New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 333–350.
43.
MeadGH (1934) Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
MikulincerMShaverPR (2004) Security-based self-representations in adulthood. Adult Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Implications: 159–195.
45.
NgaiS (2007) Ugly feelings. London: Harvard University Press.
46.
OldenburgR (1999) The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. Boston: Da Capo Press.
PosterM (1990) The mode of information: Post-structuralism and social context. Padstow: Polity Press.
49.
RaunT (2018) Capitalizing intimacy: new subcultural forms of micro-celebrity strategies and affective labour on YouTube. Convergence24(1): 99–113.
50.
RubergBCullenAL (2019) Feeling for an audience: the gendered emotional labor of video game live streaming. Digital Culture & Society5(2): 85–102.
51.
RubergBBLarkD (2021) Livestreaming from the bedroom: performing intimacy through domestic space on Twitch. Convergence27(3): 679–695.
52.
SjöblomMHamariJ (2017) Why do people watch others play video games? An empirical study on the motivations of Twitch users. Computers in Human Behavior75: 985–996.
53.
SmithJAOsbornM (2008) Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: SmithJA (eds) Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. London: Sage, 53–81.
54.
SongXCaiZChongA, et al. (2021) Investigating the effect of PK team diversity on live streaming gifting behavior: The moderating role of PK repetition. In: PACIS 2021 Proceedings. Atlanta: AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 117.
55.
SulerJ (2004) The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior7(3): 321–326.
56.
TaylorTL (2018) Watch me play: Twitch and the rise of game live streaming. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
57.
TerranovaT (2000) Free labor: producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text18(2): 33–58.
58.
ThatcherJO’SullivanDMahmoudiD (2016) Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: new metaphors for daily data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space34(6): 990–1006.
59.
ThompsonRFSpencerWA (1966) Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. Psychological Review73(1): 16.
60.
UttarapongJCaiJWohnDY (2021) Harassment experiences of women and LGBTQ live streamers and how they handled negativity. In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences. New York: ACM, 7–19.
61.
WangS (2020) Chinese Affective platform economies: dating, live streaming, and performative labor on blued. Media, Culture & Society42(4): 502–520.
62.
WangY (2021) Playing live-streaming ‘love games’: mediated intimacy and desperational labour in digital China. Journal of Gender Studies30(5): 621–632.
63.
WoodcockJJohnsonMR (2019) The affective labor and performance of live streaming on Twitch.tv. Television & New Media20(8): 813–823.
64.
WoodcockJJohnsonMR (2021) Live streamers on Twitch. Tv as social media influencers: Chances and challenges for strategic communication. In: Social media Influencers in Strategic Communication. New York: Routledge, 88–102.
65.
XuYYeY (2020) Who watches livestreaming in China? Examining viewers’ behaviors, personality traits, and motivations. Frontiers in Psychology11: 1607.
66.
YeZ (2021) Streamer-interface-viewer entanglement: an analysis on the discursive and affective live-streaming chatroom interface. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research37(70): 131–150.
67.
YeZDongCKavkaM (2023) Navigating the economy of ambivalent intimacy: gender and relational labour in China’s livestreaming industry. Feminist Media Studies23(7): 3384–3400.
68.
ZhangXXiangYHaoL (2019) Virtual gifting on China’s live streaming platforms: hijacking the online gift economy. Chinese Journal of Communication12(3): 340–355.
69.
ZuboffS (2019) The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: PublicAffairs.
