This article expands the concept of streamer imaginaries to explore the layered expectations that Netflix's diversity strategy evokes among local cultural producers. Through the exploration of these imaginaries which serve as critical junctures where global and local forces collide, we argue that Netflix's cultural power extends beyond the actions or the transformations the streamer initiates within local industries; rather, it is also shaped by the possibilities and aspirations—whether justified or not—cultural producers project onto Netflix. Based on 15 semi-structured interviews with Flemish cultural producers and content commissioners, and complemented by participant observation of three industry events, we highlight the dialectical nature of cultural producers’ imaginaries: on the one hand encompassing fears and anxieties over the loss of local talents, and struggles to maintain or redefine cultural specificity; on the other hand, creating aspirations to reach broader audiences, gain international recognition, and heightening expectations for public service actors.
AfilipoaieAIordacheCRaatsT (2021) The ‘Netflix Original’ and what it means for the production of European TV content. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies16(3): 304–325.
2.
AggerG (2016) The development of transnationality in Danish Noir – From Unit One to The Team. Northern Lights: Film & Media Studies Yearbook14(1): 83–101.
3.
AsmarARaatsTAudenhoveLV (2025) Producing diversity: on the discourses at the heart of Netflix’s production culture. Media and Communication13: 1–18.
4.
AsmarARaatsTVan AudenhoveL (2023) Streaming difference(s): netflix and the branding of diversity. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies18(1): 24–40.
5.
AsmarARaatsTVan AudenhoveL (2024a) Netflix and the transnationalisation of teen television. Television & New Media26(5): 552–569.
6.
AsmarARaatsTVan AudenhoveL (2024b) Netflix teen series and the globalization of difference. European Journal of Cultural Studies: 1–19.
7.
BarraL (2023) Dark narratives or sunny stories? Appropriating global teen drama in Italian Netflix originals. In: LotzALobatoR (eds) Streaming Video: Storytelling Across Borders. New York: New York University Press, 248–263.
8.
BondebjergIRedvallENHellesR, et al. (2017) Transnational European Television Drama: Production, Genres and Audiences. New York, NY: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
9.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
10.
BulutE (2024) Globally connected, nationally restrained: platform ambiguities and censorship in Turkey’s drama production. International Journal of Cultural Studies28(1): 99–115.
11.
Cabrera BlázquezFJCappelloMEnrichE, et al. (2018) The legal framework for international co-productions. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory: 1–84.
12.
CaldwellJT (2008) Production Culture: Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
13.
ChalabyJK (2003) Television for a new global order: Transnational television networks and the formation of global systems. Gazette: The International Journal for Communication Studies65(6): 457–472.
14.
ChalabyJK (2016) The Format Age: Television’s Entertainment Revolution. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
15.
CuelenaereE (2024) How “original” are Netflix original films? Mapping and understanding the recycling of content in the age of streaming cinema. Media, Culture & Society46(5): 991–1009.
16.
CuelenaereEJoyeS (2024) From undercover to ferry: SVOD franchise development in small European audiovisual markets. In: MeirCSmitsR (eds) European Cinema in the Streaming Era. Palgrave European Film and Media Studies. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 259–280.
17.
CvetkovichAKellnerD (2018) Introduction: Thinking global and local. In: Articulating the Global and the Local. New York, London: Routledge, 1–30.
18.
DhoestA (2001) Peasants in clogs: Imagining Flemish identity in television fiction. Studies in Popular Culture23(3): 11–24.
19.
DhoestA (2015) Contextualising diversity in TV drama: Policies, practices and discourses. International Journal of TV Serial Narratives1(2): 169–180.
20.
DhoestA (2019) Televisual identities: The case of Flemish TV drama. In: ShimpachS (eds) The Routledge Companion to Global Television. New York: Routledge, 294–303.
21.
EsserA (2002) The transnationalization of European television. Journal of European Area Studies10(1): 13–29.
22.
HallS (1991) Old and new identities, old and new ethnicities. In: KingA (ed) Culture, Globalization and the World System. London: Macmillan, 41–68.
23.
HilmesM (2014) Transnational TV: What do we mean by “Coproduction” anymore?Media Industries Journal1(2): 1–6.
24.
HjortM (2010) On the plurality of cinematic transnationalism. In: ĎurovičováNNewmanKE (eds) World Cinemas, Transnational Perspectives. New York and London: Routledge, 12–33.
25.
IdizDR (2024) Local production for global streamers: How Netflix shapes European production cultures. International Journal of Communication18: 2129–2148.
26.
IordacheCRaatsTAfilipoaieA (2021) Transnationalisation revisited through the Netflix Original: An analysis of (co-) production strategies in Europe. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies28(1): 236–254.
27.
JennerM (2023) Netflix and the Re-Invention of Television. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
28.
KimT (2022a) Cultural politics of Netflix in local contexts: A case of the Korean media industries. Media, Culture & Society44(8): 1508–1522.
29.
KimT (2022b) Critical interpretations of global-local co-productions in subscription video-on-demand platforms: A case study of Netflix’s YG future strategy office. Television & New Media23(4): 405–421.
30.
LobatoR (2019) Netflix Nations. New York: New York University Press.
31.
LotzAD (2022) Netflix and Streaming Video: The Business of Subscriber-Funded Video on Demand. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
32.
LotzAD (2025) After Mass Media: Storytelling for Microaudiences in the Twenty-First Century. New York: NYU Press.
33.
MayerVBanksMJCaldwellJT (2009) Production Studies: Cultural Studies of Media Industries. New York and London: Routledge.
34.
MeirCMitricP (2025) Intellectual Property and the Contemporary European Audiovisual Industries. European Audiovisual Production Association (CEPI).
35.
MikosL (2020) Berlin As location and production site for transnational TV drama. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies15(4): 373–392.
NohS (2024) Global media streams: Netflix and the changing ecosystem of anime production. Television & New Media25(3): 234–250.
38.
OrtnerSB (2010) Access: Reflections on studying up in Hollywood. Ethnography11(2): 211–233.
39.
PanisKPaulussenSDhoestA (2019) Managing super-diversity on television: The representation of ethnic minorities in Flemish non-fiction programmes. Media and Communication7(1): 13–21.
40.
RaatsTEvensT (2021) If you can’t beat them, be them’: A critical analysis of local streaming platform and Netflix alternative Streamz. MedieKultur: Journal of media and Communication Research37(70): 50–66.
41.
RaatsTIordacheC (2020) From Nordic Noir to Belgian bright?: Shifting TV drama production and distribution in small markets: The case of Flanders. VIEW Journal of European Television History and Culture9(17): 79–92.
42.
RasmussenNV (2024) Friction in the Netflix machine: How screen workers interact with streaming data. New Media & Society: 1–17.
43.
SimonG (2023) Formalised transnationalism in the informal Nigerian video film industry: Streaming, audience re-imaginations and production reconfigurations. Transnational Screens 15(3): 219–236.
44.
StraubhaarJSantillanaMde Macedo Higgins JoyceV, et al. (2021) From Telenovelas to Netflix: Transnational, Transverse Television in Latin America. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
SzczepanikP (2024) SVOD Production in East-Central Europe: Understanding the ‘streamer Imaginaries’ of independent producers. In: MeirCSmitsR (eds) European Cinema in the Streaming Era: Policy, Platforms, and Production. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 215–238.
47.
van KeulenJBauwensJKrijnenT (2020) “Everyone working a little more closely together”: The transnationalization of creative production in TV production conglomerates. Television & New Media21(7): 749–767.
48.
Van KeulenJKrijnenTBauwensJ (2021) The logic of formatting: A case study on transnational television production. Journal of Popular Television9(3): 391–408.
49.
VanleeF (2024) Programming queerness? PSM remits, Metarepresentational discourse, and LGBTQ+ portrayals. International Journal of Communication18: 3944–3963.
50.
VanleeFVan BauwelSDhaenensF (2020) Distinctively queer in the Parish: Performances of distinction and LGBTQ+ representations in Flemish prestige television fiction. European Journal of Cultural Studies23(4): 548–563.
WeissmannE (2012) Transnational Television Drama: Special Relations and Mutual Influence between the US and UK. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
53.
WilliamsR (1989) Resources of Hope: Culture, Democracy, Socialism. London, New York: Verso Books.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
