The rise of social media usage has generated global debates over efforts to address widening concerns through moderation of user practices and content that potentially undermine public safety and security. Content moderation has become a politically contested issue globally, while also attracting more attention across Africa and Nigeria in recent times. A case in point is the seven-month ban imposed on Twitter by the immediate-past government of Muhammadu Buhari, who was Nigeria's president from 2015 to 2023, following Twitter's decision to remove a tweet in which Buhari referenced the Nigerian Civil War and appeared to threaten violence against separatists in June 2021. To expand the ongoing debates about the politicization of social media use and content moderation, we conceive a peace journalism framework synthesizing the impact of political communication and media narratives on societal conflict dynamics, offering a critical reflection on the political contexts of Nigeria's Twitter ban. The theoretical lens of peace journalism was deployed to understand the implications of polarizing discourses originating from social media communication strategies of political actors. We adapt the indicators for peace versus war-oriented coverage to analyze 48 journalistic articles published across 10 English-language news outlets during the initial three-months of Nigeria's Twitter ban to assess the role that media narratives can play in mitigating or exacerbating societal tensions. Findings indicate that Buhari's Twitter-based political discourse elicits diverse perceptions of his intentions, potentially fomenting polarization, while news outlets used distinctive reporting styles that produce narratives likely to promote nonviolent responses to the ban or escalate tensions.
AdegbijaE (1997) The identity, survival, and promotion of minority languages in Nigeria. International Journal of the Sociology of Language125(1): 5–27.
2.
AhmedWBathPADemartiniG (2017) Using twitter as a data source: An overview of ethical, legal, and methodological challenges. In: WoodfieldK (eds) The Ethics of Online Research: Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, 79–107.
3.
AlizadehMGilardiFHoesE, et al. (2022) Content moderation as a political issue: The Twitter discourse around Trump’s ban. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media2: 1–44.
AuwalAMErsoyM (2022) Peace journalism strategy for covering online political discourses in a multipolar society and the new public sphere. Information Development38(1): 6–22.
7.
AuwalAMTamarHDErsoyM (2022) Chastising the child of necessity: peace journalism and Almajiri repatriation during COVID-19. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies19(4): 363–384.
8.
BailCAArgyleLPBrownTW, et al. (2018) Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115(37): 9216–9221.
9.
BakerSAWadeMWalshMJ (2020) The challenges of responding to misinformation during a pandemic: content moderation and the limitations of the concept of harm. Media International Australia177(1): 103–107.
Belair-GagnonVReversM (2018) The sociology of journalism. In: VosTP (eds) Journalism: Handbooks of Communication Science. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 257–280.
13.
BestMLMengA (2015) Twitter democracy: Policy versus identity politics in three emerging African democracies. In: ICTD ‘15: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development [Article No. 20], Singapore, pp.1–10: Digital Liberacy-ACM, https://doi.org/10.1145/2737856.2738017.
14.
BiazotoJ (2011) Peace journalism where there is no war. Conflict & Communication Online10(2): 1–19.
15.
BoschTE (2021) Social media and everyday life in South Africa. New York: Routledge.
16.
BoschTEAdmireMNcubeM (2020) Facebook and politics in Africa: Zimbabwe and Kenya. Media, Culture & Society42(3): 349–364.
ChariT (2023) Between state interests and citizen digital rights: Making sense of internet shutdowns in Zimbabwe. In: KperogiFA (eds) Digital Dissidence and Social Media Censorship in Africa. New York: Routledge, 76–97.
21.
ChiluwaI (2018) A nation divided against itself: Biafra and the conflicting online protest discourses. Discourse & Communication12(4): 357–381.
22.
ChirimambowaTC (2024) Fireproofing the digital public sphere in sub-Saharan Africa. In: Perspectives- Digital rights and access to information series. Windhoek: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung fesmedia Africa. 1–11. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/africa-media/21138.pdf.
23.
ChitananaT (2023) Subaltern voices and hegemony: Performance, digital media and activism in Zimbabwe. In: SibandaN (eds) Performance Trends in Postliberation Zimbabwe: Practices, Projections and Trajectories. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 72–87.
24.
ChukwuereJEOnyebukwaCFMbukanmaI (2020) The role of social media platforms in revolutionising the orthodox African electoral process and outcomes. Journal of African Films & Diaspora Studies3(2): 7–23.
25.
CohenRRaiS (2000) Global social movements: Towards a cosmopolitan politics. In: CohenRRaiSM (eds) Global Social Movements. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 1–17.
ColemanSSorensenL (2023) Handbook of Digital Politics, Second EditionCheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
28.
ConoverMDRatkiewiczJFranciscoMR,et al.Political polarization on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, July 17-21, 2011. The AAAI Press.
29.
CoxKMarcellinoWBellasioJ, et al. (2018) Social media in Africa: A double-edged sword for security and development [Research report]. California: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP67728.html.
30.
DavenportC (2007) State repression and the domestic democratic peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
DraguTLupuY (2021) Digital authoritarianism and the future of human rights. International Organization75(4): 991–1017.
32.
DwyerMMolonyT (2019a) Social media and politics in Africa. London: Zed Books.
33.
DwyerMMolonyT (2019) Mapping the study of politics and social media use in Africa. In: MolonyMD (eds) Social Media and Politics in Africa: Democracy, Censorship and Security. London: Zed Books Ltd, 1–18.
34.
El ShokrofyEM (2023) Social media, censorship and counter-censorship of female performances in Morocco and Egypt. In: KperogiFA (eds) Digital Dissidence and Social Media Censorship in Africa. New York: Routledge, 139–154.
35.
EndongFPObiP (2023) Cyber space as battlefield for nationalist and separatist groups: A study of Nigeria’s indigenous people of Biafra online propaganda. In: KperogiFA (eds) Digital Dissidence and Social Media Censorship in Africa. New York: Routledge, 119–138.
FalisseJ-BNkengurutseH (2019) From FM radio stations to internet 2.0 overnight: Information, participation and social media in post-failed coup Burundi. In: MolonyMD (eds) Social Media and Politics in Africa: Democracy, Censorship and Security. London: Zed Books Ltd, 173–194.
39.
FletcherRKleisNR (2017) Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. Journal of Communication67(4): 476–498.
GaltungJ (2003) Peace journalism. Media Asia30(3): 177–180.
45.
GaltungJFischerD (2013) Positive and negative peace. In: BrauchHG (eds) Springer Briefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice (Volume 5). New York: Springer Heidelberg, 173–178.
46.
GaltungJVincentRC (2004) U.S. Glasnost: Missing Political Themes in U.S. Media Discourse. New Jersey: Hampton Press.
47.
GavilánMT (2011) Framing the news: from political conflict to peace. How the framing theory and political context model can enhance the peace journalism model. Journal of Latin American Communication Research1(2): 48–61.
48.
GerrardYThornhamH (2020) Content moderation: social media’s sexist assemblages. New Media & Society22(7): 1266–1286.
49.
GillespieT (2018) Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. New Haven: Yale University Press.
50.
GillespieTAufderheidePCarmiE, et al. (2020) Expanding the debate about content moderation: scholarly research agendas for the coming policy debates. Internet Policy Review9(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1512.
51.
GoreCD (2023) The politics of the internet and social media in Africa: three bases of knowledge for advancing research. Canadian Journal of African Studies/Revue Canadienne des études Africaines57(1): 201–217.
52.
GruzdARoyJ (2014) Investigating political polarization on Twitter: a Canadian perspective. Policy & Internet6(1): 28–45.
HandlerJF (1992) Postmodernism, protest, and the new social movements. Law & Society Review26(4): 697–731.
55.
HasellAHalversenAWeeksBE (2024) When social media attack: how exposure to political attacks on social media promotes anger and political cynicism. The International Journal of Press/Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/194016122312.
56.
HongSKimSH (2016) Political polarization on Twitter: implications for the use of social media in digital governments. Government Information Quarterly33(4): 777–782.
ITU (2023) Measuring digital development: Facts and Figures 2023. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union (ITU).
59.
JiaCLamMSMaiMC, et al. (2024) Embedding democratic values into social media AIs via societal objective functions. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW1), pp.1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3641002
60.
JungherrARiveroGGayo-AvelloD (2020) The rise of digital media and the retooling of politics. In: JungherrARiveroGGayo-AvelloD (eds) Retooling politics: How digital media are shaping democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–29.
61.
KasadhaJ (2020) Does social media matter in developing democracies? Examining its impact on citizen political participation and expression in Uganda. Journal of Public Affairs20(1): e1981.
62.
KempfW (2019) Concepts and conceptions of peace journalism. Conflict & Communication Online18(2): 1–11.
63.
LeeCShinJHongA (2018) Does social media use really make people politically polarized? Direct and indirect effects of social media use on political polarization in South Korea. Telematics and Informatics35(1): 245–254.
64.
LigtvoetIOudenhuijsenL (2019) A rebel youth? Social media, charismatic leadership, and ‘radicalized’ youth in the 2015 Biafra protests. In: BruijnMd (eds) Biographies of Radicalization: Hidden Messages of Social Change. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 134–151.
65.
LynchJMcGoldrickA (2007) Peace journalism. In: WebelCGaltungJ (eds) Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies. New York: Routledge, 248–264.
66.
LynchJMcGoldrickA (2012) Responses to peace journalism. Journalism14(8): 1041–1058.
67.
MarcuMBălteanuC (2014) Social media–A real source of proliferation of international terrorism. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica1(16): 162–169.
68.
MasroorFKhanQNAibI, et al. (2019) Polarization and ideological weaving in Twitter discourse of politicians. Social Media + Society5(4): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119891220.
69.
MbahPONwangwuCUgwuSC (2019) Contentious elections, political exclusion, and challenges of national integration in Nigeria. Cogent Social Sciences5(1): 1–21.
McNairB (1998) The sociology of journalism. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
72.
MushakojiK (2007) Peace studies and peace politics: Multicultural common security in north–south conflict situations. In: WebelCGaltungJ (eds) Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies. New York: Routledge, 86–93.
73.
MutsvairoBRagneddaMMabvundwiK (2023) Our old pastor thinks the mobile phone is a source of evil.’ capturing contested and conflicting insights on digital wellbeing and digital detoxing in an age of rapid mobile connectivity. Media International Australia189(1): 89–103.
74.
MutsvairoBSantosFOChitananaT (2023) De-Westernizing digital politics: A global south viewpoint. In: ColemanSSorensenL (eds) Handbook of Digital Politics, Second Edition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 16–29.
75.
NdlelaMNManoW (2020) Social Media and Elections in Africa: Theoretical Perspectives and Election Campaigns. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
76.
NonterahNK (2024) The real divides in Africa. In: CavanaughWTMendoza-AlvarezCOkaforIUPilarioDF (eds) Fratelli Tutti: A Global Commentary. Eugene: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 9–15.
77.
Ofori-ParkuSSMoscatoD (2018) Hashtag activism as a form of political action: a qualitative analysis of the#BringBackOurGirls campaign in Nigerian, UK, and US press. International Journal of Communication12(23): 2480–2502.
78.
OginniSOMoituiJN (2015) Social media and public policy process in Africa: enhanced policy process in digital age. Consilience14: 158–172.
79.
OnuohaG (2018, June) Memory, reconciliation, and peacebuilding in post-civil war Nigeria. African Peacebuilding Network Working Papers: No. 19. Social Science Research Council.
RezaeiFCohenR (2012) The role of social media in the recent political shifts in the Middle East and North Africa. Journal of Humanities and Social Science4(6): 1–10.
83.
SchudsonM (2003) The sociology of news: Contemporary Sociology. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
84.
SeiyefaE (2017) Elite political culture—A link to political violence: evidence from Nigeria. African Security10(2): 103–130.
85.
ShawISLynchJHackettRA (2011) Expanding peace journalism: Comparative and critical approaches. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
86.
ShifaMPabónFA (2021) The interaction of mass media and social media in fuelling ethnic violence in Ethiopia. Conflict Trends4: 39–47.
87.
SkjerdalTGebruS (2020) Not quite an echo chamber: ethnic debate on Ethiopian Facebook pages during times of unrest. Media, Culture & Society42(3): 365–379.
88.
SmidiAShahinS (2017) Social media and social mobilisation in the Middle East: a survey of research on the Arab Spring. India Quarterly73(2): 196–209.
89.
SunMLiuJLuJ (2024) Digital literacy in Africa: exploring its relationship with infrastructure, policy, and social inequality. African Journalism Studies44(3): 204–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2024.2329705.
90.
TamarHDMetinEAuwalAM, et al. (2022) Office of the citizen: a qualitative analysis of Twitter activity during the Lekki shooting in Nigeria’s #EndSARS protests. Information, Communication & Society25(15): 2246–2263.
91.
TienJHEisenbergMCCherngST, et al. (2020) Online reactions to the 2017 ‘Unite the right’ rally in Charlottesville: measuring polarization in Twitter networks using media followership. Applied Network Science5): 10.
UNESCO (2015) Countering online hate speech. Paris: UNESCO.
94.
UNESCO (2023) Social media 4 peace: Local lessons forglobal practices. Paris: UNESCO.
95.
UrmanA (2020) Context matters: political polarization on Twitter from a comparative perspective. Media, Culture & Society42(6): 857–879.
96.
ValenzuelaS (2013) Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: the roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist57(7): 920–942.
97.
VasileiouKBarnettJThorpeS, et al. (2018) Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology18(148): 1–18.
98.
VedelT (2003) Political communication in the age of the internet. In: MaarekPJWolfsfeldG (eds) Political Communication in a new era: A Cross-National Perspective. London: Routledge, 41–59.
WebelCGaltungJ (2007) Handbook of peace and conflict studies. New York: Routledge.
101.
WestSM (2018) Censored, suspended, shadowbanned: user interpretations of content moderation on social media platforms. New Media & Society20(11): 4366–4383.
102.
WolfsfeldG (2003a) Media, conflict, and peace. In: MaarekPJWolfsfeldG (eds) Political Communication in a new era. London: Routledge, 139–156.
103.
WolfsfeldG (2003) The political contest model. In: CottleS (eds) News, Public Relations and Power. London: Sage, 81–96.
104.
YangJRojasHWojcieszakM, et al. (2016) Why are “others” so polarized? Perceived political polarization and media use in 10 countries. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication21(5): 349–367.
105.
YoungGK (2022) How much is too much: the difficulties of social media content moderation. Information & Communications Technology Law31(1): 1–16.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
